Post Office Box 1147  ●  Marblehead, Massachusetts 01945  ●  (781) 639-9709
“Every Tax is a Pay Cut ... A Tax Cut is a Pay Raise”

45 years as “The Voice of Massachusetts Taxpayers”
and their Institutional Memory

Help save yourself join CLT today!


CLT introduction  and membership  application

What CLT saves you from the auto excise tax alone

Make a contribution to support CLT's work by clicking the button above

Ask your friends to join too

Visit CLT on Facebook

Barbara Anderson's Great Moments

Follow CLT on Twitter

CLT UPDATE
Friday, April 26, 2019

House passes its $42.7 Billion budget


IN THE HOUSE

On the third day of consideration of the $42.7 billion fiscal 2020 budget, the House added roughly $23.5 million in spending in accounts related to housing, mental health and disability services, public safety, judiciary, and public health.

Before recessing until 11 a.m. Thursday, the House heard inaugural floor speeches from Rep. Alyson Sullivan of Abington and Rep. Natalie Blais of Sunderland.

The House will return to action on Thursday and Speaker DeLeo told representatives to expect a consolidated amendment related to constitutional officers, state administration and transportation to emerge for review at noon. Along with those topics, the House is still waiting to see a consolidated package of labor and economic development-related amendments. Less than two dozen amendments categorized as "legislation, non-budget" also remain pending before the House. Roll calls are expected to begin around 12:30 p.m.

State House News Service
Wednesday, April 24, 2019
House Session
By Colin A. Young


A capped land conservation tax credit would be expanded under a budget amendment adopted by the House on Thursday that would reduce a logjam of landowners looking to take advantage, according to supporters.

Minority Leader Brad Jones sponsored the amendment that would gradually raise the tax credit cap from $2 million to $5 million over three years. The limit would increase by $1 million a year for three years, starting Jan. 1, 2020.

The amendment to the fiscal 2020 budget passed the House unanimously.

State House News Service
Thursday, April 25, 2019
House votes to expand land conservation tax credit


The House passed a budget Thursday night for the fiscal year that begins July 1 that would authorize more than $42.7 billion in spending, including significant new investments in elementary and secondary education, while also avoiding any significant tax increases.

The vote for the budget was 154-1, with Democrat Rep. Russell Holmes of Mattapan casting the lone dissenting vote in a branch that also includes 32 Republicans and one independent.

Over the course of four days of deliberations and sporadic floor debates, House lawmakers added nearly $71 million to the spending plan first laid out two weeks ago by the House Ways and Means Committee....

Most of the action during the week took place in the House Members' Lounge where lawmakers pitched leadership on pet projects and priorities that led to large, consolidated amendments loaded with earmarks for legislators' districts.

Holmes, who has been on the outs with leadership for a few years, spoke Thursday about his proposal to change the way legislators are compensated. Holmes argued for a similar proposal during the House rules debate in January, and said it would address the issue of compensation in a more equitable way and remove a degree of power the speaker holds over the members through control of committee assignments and stipends. The Holmes amendment was rejected.

The House also voted Thursday for Minority Leader Brad Jones's plan to expand a land conservation tax credit, which allows landowners to get a tax break if they donate property to the state for preservation, and tweaked the pricing requirement for the next solicitations for off-shore wind power.

In all, the House considered 1,369 amendments over the course of the week, and will now wait to see how the spending plan is received by the Senate in May before negotiations between the branches begin.

State House News Service
Thursday, April 25, 2019
House Session
By Matt Murphy


State Rep. Russell Holmes attempted to cut pay for the Speaker and House leadership Thursday, filing an amendment essentially reversing a hefty raise that the House voted for themselves in 2017.

“I still believe that two years ago we made a very bad decision,” Holmes said outside the House Chamber. “Structurally, I think it’s very bad for the commonwealth for us not to be paid the same because of the fact that we have, essentially, the exact same job.”

The House voted themselves an $18 million pay raise package in 2017, an average 40% increase, overriding a veto from Gov. Charlie Baker, who called it “fiscally irresponsible.”

Holmes’ amendment would reduce “additional” pay, which is given on top of base salaries, for Speaker Robert DeLeo from its current $80,000 to $50,000, and for chairmen of Ways and Means from $65,000 to $35,000. The base salary for the Speaker in 2019 is $66,257.09 and the Legislature gets a pay raise every two years, according to the state Constitution.

Under the amendment, compensation for floor leaders and the president and speaker pro tempore of the Senate and House would be cut in half. Mileage stipends would also be reduced....

Holmes, a Democrat representing District 6 (Suffolk), argued during budget deliberations that pay should be equal among lawmakers, similar to how it’s done in Congress, but the measure was overwhelmingly voted down 151-5. He said he wasn’t surprised.

“This pace is sheep being led by a shepherd,” Holmes said. “Once you see one vote from the Speaker, you know how most of the rest of the building is going to go.”

The Boston Herald
Friday, April 26, 2019
Russell Holmes files amendment to block legislative pay hike


It's safe to say the luster of House "budget week" is gone. And it has been for a few years. The deliberations are a showcase of Republicans and Democrats agreeing, and keeping any disagreements private.

The days of hallways crowded with lobbyists, late nights and contentious policy debates seem to be a thing of the past. Now only a smattering of lobbyists linger outside the House chamber (emails and texts will suffice), the latest lawmakers stayed any night this week was 9:39 p.m. and the idea of opposition seems almost quaint.

A far cry from the "Animal House" days of yore.

But members, by and large, seemed content to let the process unfold. And the product remains the same - a spending plan for the coming fiscal year that now approaches $42.8 billion after lawmakers padded the Ways and Means budget with about $71 million over four days.

Even the Republicans had little to say, spending much of the week counting their chits, perhaps the bounty paid for their silence. Minority Leader Brad Jones stepped to the mic just once over four days to explain his proposal to expand a land conservation tax credit, which had the backing of Democrats and passed unanimously....

As has become custom, new spending was packed on through large, earmark-filled consolidated amendments put together by the Ways and Means Committee and new chairman Aaron Michlewitz, who spent hours meeting privately with members in the infamous Room 348, otherwise known as the Members' Lounge, to discuss priorities.

While any member can choose to have their amendment debated individually, only Rep. Russell Holmes did. The Mattapan Democrat made a plea for legislative pay reform that he said would bring equity to the system and take some stipend-related power away from the speaker.

Needless to say, it failed....

And the policy debates, such as they were, were limited to brief explanations of what had been decided....

House Speaker Robert DeLeo declared the final product - which was Michlewitz's first as Ways and Means chairman - an "excellent piece of work." Overall, it increases state spending by about 3 percent over last year, including over $200 million in new funding for public schools.

On the other side of the building, the Senate packed its work into one day on Thursday when it finished the job of overriding Baker's veto of a bill to repeal a cap on family welfare benefits.

The Senate also passed a bill to allow people to choose a nonbinary gender designation of "X" on driver's licenses and birth certificates, and a road safety bill requiring bicycle tailights, safety mirrors on state-owned trucks and more.

State House News Service
Friday, April 26, 2019
Weekly Roundup - Order in the House


In the fiscal 2020 budget approved Thursday night by the Massachusetts House, lawmakers passed on the opportunity to adopt major new taxes or revenues to make the kind of investments in education and transportation that Democrats have been clamoring for since 2016. Now the action is shifting to the Senate, where leadership also appears uncertain about a path forward on revenue generation.

The Legislature's unspoken game plan this year appears to call for authorizing a larger than usual investment in K-12 public education for fiscal 2020, but punting until later this year, at the earliest, on the debate over taxes, a conversation complicated by Gov. Charlie Baker's thoughts.

The governor is simultaneously open to some new taxes (he's proposed a few of his own) while also opposed to increases in broad-based taxes, a category that his administration is loath to define other than specifying he's against increasing the income or sales taxes.

After misplaying their push for new taxes on the wealthy to pay for education and transportation investments, Democrats are now in the position of choosing between coming up with a tax package that might survive a Baker veto or playing the governor's game and trying to wedge big investments in those areas into the nearly $43 billion budget without coming up with new revenues.

The House so far this year has adopted Baker's approach, although House leaders say they'll hold a revenue debate this year. The stakes are high. The outcome of this slowly unfolding drama, as well as debates over reform proposals, will determine how far the state can go in addressing traffic congestion, subpar MBTA service, zip code-based inequities in public education, the affordability crisis in higher education, and the state's economic competitiveness.

The nearly $43 billion House budget will soon officially be in the custody of new Senate Ways and Means Chairman Michael Rodrigues of Westport. The Senate will work off the same revenue assumptions as Baker and the House, although everyone on Beacon Hill has an eye on April revenue collections, due out next week, to better gauge the strength or weakness of tax collections that facilitate all of the spending lawmakers promote during springtime budget deliberations....

The break before May's Senate budget deliberations gives lawmakers an opportunity to dive back into public hearings on bills. Topics on the docket for next week include investing in public higher education, protecting people with intellectual or developmental disabilities, public housing, workforce development and union benefits, as well as bills dealing with hate crimes, hazing and abortion. Senate aides say they plan to follow the budget rollout and deliberation cycle used in prior years, which featured debate the week before Memorial Day.

State House News Service
Friday, April 26, 2019
Advances - Week of April 28, 2019


IN THE SENATE

Expanding road tolls across Massachusetts and to the state's borders could be a way to generate new revenue to address growing transportation woes, Senate President Karen Spilka said Thursday.

In remarks at a Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce breakfast Thursday, Spilka, an Ashland Democrat, told business leaders that tolls similar to those along Interstate 90 deserve consideration for other places.

"Simply put, and I put this out there, if tolls are a good idea for my district, my region, I believe we should explore the possibility of expanded tolling, including possibly at our borders," Spilka said. "Our best ideas won't matter if we can't find a way to make a 21st century transportation infrastructure a reality — and find a way to pay for it."

Spilka also mentioned congestion pricing, an idea other lawmakers on Beacon Hill have frequently raised, as a way to address worsening traffic and infrastructure. Echoing a similar comment made last month by House Speaker Robert DeLeo, Spilka told the audience that no proposal should be "off the table."

The Legislature, she said, must soon take up "an honest and clear-eyed conversation about how we will pay for the proposed solutions to our complex challenges." ...

It's not clear if lawmakers view the House budget being debated this week as a "money bill," a designation that would allow the Senate to add in new revenues when they take it up next month. Spilka said Thursday she is not sure if the current version is a money bill and is awaiting the final House vote.

The House on Thursday added a rider to its budget expanding a land conservation tax credit.

State House News Service
Thursday, April 25, 2019
More tolled roads deserve consideration, Spilka says


While the House continued sorting through hundreds of budget amendments, the Senate on Thursday churned through policy debates in a compact session. The session began with senators voting 37-3 to override Gov. Charlie Baker's veto of legislation lifting a 1990s-era state policy barring families receiving public assistance benefits from getting additional benefits when another child is born.

The Senate then heard an inaugural speech from Sen. Jo Comerford, who spoke about a bill to give adults three options when indicating gender on state identification records -- male, female or "X." That bill, after being amended on the floor, was passed 39-1.

To wrap up its Thursday, the Senate voted unanimously to pass a road safety bill focused on pedestrian and bicyclist safety. The Senate will return on Monday for an informal session.

A Senate vote Thursday passed into law over Gov. Charlie Baker's veto legislation lifting a 1990s-era state policy barring families receiving public assistance benefits from getting additional benefits when another child is born.

Sen. Sal DiDomenico, who has long been pushing to eliminate the so-called cap on kids, said it was the sixth time the Senate voted to do away with the policy....

"Lifting the Cap on Kids will make a critical difference in the lives of 8,700 of the lowest income children in Massachusetts," Deborah Harris of the Massachusetts Law Reform Institute said. "With today's vote, Massachusetts has affirmed the dignity and humanity of every child."

State House News Service
Thursday, April 25, 2019
Lawmakers lift cap on family welfare benefits


Chip Ford's CLT Commentary

The current fiscal year's budget, passed last July by both the House and Senate, totaled $41.9 Billion.  This year's House budget came to $42.7 Billion, an increase of $800 Million over last year's and now it moves on to the Senate which undoubtedly will add even more spending.  After that it'll go to a House/Senate conference committee where we can only hope it won't become another "Bacon Hill Compromise" that spends even more than either chamber proposed.  In the end I expect it will easily exceed $43 Billion.

When it gets to the Senate watch for whether it will be deemed a "money bill" due to the House's inclusion of Minority Leader Brad Jones' (R-North Reading) amendment to expand the conservation tax credit.  His amendment was adopted unanimously with the support of all House Democrats and Republicans.  In its July 2015 ruling on what constitutes a "money bill" the State House News Service reported on the ruling of the state's highest court:

The Supreme Judicial Court, in its opinion signed by all seven justices, found that the House's decision in its version of the budget to delay the implementation of a business tax break and expand a tax credit for land conservation opened the door for the Senate to propose additional tax policy changes.

It appears the House failed to learn from its previous mistake or without dissent, it intentionally again expanded the conservation tax credit to knowingly open the tax floodgate in the Senate.


When I read on Wednesday evening "the House is still waiting to see a consolidated package of labor and economic development-related amendments" I dug into the multitude of amendments looking for another stealth return of the neighborhood tax the "Community Benefit Districts" scheme.  You may recall that it was quietly introduced for the fourth time as an amendment in last year's budget.  It eventually didn't get enough votes for engrossment when it appeared in the $600 Million Economic Development bill, after CLT and our coalition of the left raised sufficient awareness and opposition to kill it.

I've pored over the many hundreds of amendments and consolidated amendments but have so far been unable to find a reprise of the "Community Benefit Districts" scheme among them.  If it's buried there hidden discretely maybe you can find it . . .

HOUSE CONSOLIDATED AMENDMENTS

Meanwhile I'll continue looking, and keeping prepared for another sneak attack.

A lot happened this week to digest so I'll keep this short.  In such a secretive process I'm sure more will be discovered and revealed in the days ahead, before it's the Senate's turn at their own budget.

Chip Ford
Executive Director


 

State House News Service
Thursday, April 25, 2019

House votes to expand land conservation tax credit
By Matt Murphy


A capped land conservation tax credit would be expanded under a budget amendment adopted by the House on Thursday that would reduce a logjam of landowners looking to take advantage, according to supporters.

Minority Leader Brad Jones sponsored the amendment that would gradually raise the tax credit cap from $2 million to $5 million over three years. The limit would increase by $1 million a year for three years, starting Jan. 1, 2020.

The amendment to the fiscal 2020 budget passed the House unanimously.

Jones, a North Reading Republican, said he worked with retired lawmaker Stephen Kulik of Worthington to create the program in 2009. Since it took effect in 2011, landowners have donated more than 12,000 acres to the state for conservation in exchange for a credit on their taxes.

Jones said there is a queue of landowners with applications to donate property, but the cap has created a lengthy waiting period and is preventing the state from taking advantage of opportunities to preserve open space and reduce its carbon footprint.

Rep. William "Smitty" Pignatelli, a Lenox Democrat and co-chair of the Committee on the Environment, said landowners with applications pending now will have to wait until 2021 to take advantage of the program unless the program is expanded.


State House News Service
Thursday, April 25, 2019

House Session - Thursday, April 25, 2019
By Matt Murphy


The House passed a budget Thursday night for the fiscal year that begins July 1 that would authorize more than $42.7 billion in spending, including significant new investments in elementary and secondary education, while also avoiding any significant tax increases.

The vote for the budget was 154-1, with Democrat Rep. Russell Holmes of Mattapan casting the lone dissenting vote in a branch that also includes 32 Republicans and one independent.

Over the course of four days of deliberations and sporadic floor debates, House lawmakers added nearly $71 million to the spending plan first laid out two weeks ago by the House Ways and Means Committee. They also made changes to Gov. Charlie Baker's proposal to let MassHealth negotiate cheaper drug prices with pharmaceutical manufactures and adopted a plan put forward by Rep. William Straus to open up a new market in Massachusetts for the processing of shell-on lobster parts.

This was the first budget put together by North End Democrat Rep. Aaron Michlewitz, and House Speaker Robert DeLeo on Thursday night called it an "excellent piece of work."

"The week has gone relatively smoothly and they deserve congratulations," Second Assistant Majority Leader Michael Moran told his colleagues as the fourth day was winding to a close, referring to Michlewitz and the committee staff.

Most of the action during the week took place in the House Members' Lounge where lawmakers pitched leadership on pet projects and priorities that led to large, consolidated amendments loaded with earmarks for legislators' districts.

Holmes, who has been on the outs with leadership for a few years, spoke Thursday about his proposal to change the way legislators are compensated. Holmes argued for a similar proposal during the House rules debate in January, and said it would address the issue of compensation in a more equitable way and remove a degree of power the speaker holds over the members through control of committee assignments and stipends. The Holmes amendment was rejected.

The House also voted Thursday for Minority Leader Brad Jones's plan to expand a land conservation tax credit, which allows landowners to get a tax break if they donate property to the state for preservation, and tweaked the pricing requirement for the next solicitations for off-shore wind power.

In all, the House considered 1,369 amendments over the course of the week, and will now wait to see how the spending plan is received by the Senate in May before negotiations between the branches begin.


The Boston Herald
Friday, April 26, 2019

Russell Holmes files amendment to block legislative pay hike
By Mary Markos

State Rep. Russell Holmes attempted to cut pay for the Speaker and House leadership Thursday, filing an amendment essentially reversing a hefty raise that the House voted for themselves in 2017.

“I still believe that two years ago we made a very bad decision,” Holmes said outside the House Chamber. “Structurally, I think it’s very bad for the commonwealth for us not to be paid the same because of the fact that we have, essentially, the exact same job.”

The House voted themselves an $18 million pay raise package in 2017, an average 40% increase, overriding a veto from Gov. Charlie Baker, who called it “fiscally irresponsible.”

Holmes’ amendment would reduce “additional” pay, which is given on top of base salaries, for Speaker Robert DeLeo from its current $80,000 to $50,000, and for chairmen of Ways and Means from $65,000 to $35,000. The base salary for the Speaker in 2019 is $66,257.09 and the Legislature gets a pay raise every two years, according to the state Constitution.

Under the amendment, compensation for floor leaders and the president and speaker pro tempore of the Senate and House would be cut in half. Mileage stipends would also be reduced.

Spokesperson for Massachusetts Fiscal Alliance Paul D. Craney criticized the Speaker’s “tradition of opaque and secretive” budget deliberations, which are held in closed-door meetings.

“The Massachusetts House of Representative isn’t even pretending anymore,” Craney said. “The Speaker shouldn’t have this much control over the process. Rep. Holmes’ amendment is a call to reject the way the House doles out its pay, perks and privilege to the House’s ruling class.”

Rep. Danielle Gregoire (D-Marlborough) opposed Holmes’ amendment, arguing that base salaries are adjusted under a constitutional amendment. She also pointed out that the pay structure is based on a 2014 report that recommended various pay raises for lawmakers and elected officials.

Holmes, a Democrat representing District 6 (Suffolk), argued during budget deliberations that pay should be equal among lawmakers, similar to how it’s done in Congress, but the measure was overwhelmingly voted down 151-5. He said he wasn’t surprised.

“This pace is sheep being led by a shepherd,” Holmes said. “Once you see one vote from the Speaker, you know how most of the rest of the building is going to go.”


State House News Service
Friday, April 26, 2019

Weekly Roundup - Order in the House
By Matt Murphy

House lawmakers demonstrated this week how easy it can be to spend a cool $42 billion and change.

Representatives from Fall River to Attleboro shivered their way through four days of "debate" where the only thing more challenging than staying warm was finding ways to occupy the time.

"Other than the temperature, it's going smoothly. It's like a polar vortex in there," reported Lenox Democratic William "Smitty" Pignatelli, commenting on the A/C chilled chamber that had lawmakers huddling under blankets as they munched their way through bags of Swedish fish.

It's safe to say the luster of House "budget week" is gone. And it has been for a few years. The deliberations are a showcase of Republicans and Democrats agreeing, and keeping any disagreements private.

The days of hallways crowded with lobbyists, late nights and contentious policy debates seem to be a thing of the past. Now only a smattering of lobbyists linger outside the House chamber (emails and texts will suffice), the latest lawmakers stayed any night this week was 9:39 p.m. and the idea of opposition seems almost quaint.

A far cry from the "Animal House" days of yore.

But members, by and large, seemed content to let the process unfold. And the product remains the same - a spending plan for the coming fiscal year that now approaches $42.8 billion after lawmakers padded the Ways and Means budget with about $71 million over four days.

Even the Republicans had little to say, spending much of the week counting their chits, perhaps the bounty paid for their silence. Minority Leader Brad Jones stepped to the mic just once over four days to explain his proposal to expand a land conservation tax credit, which had the backing of Democrats and passed unanimously.

The political sniping, instead, took place between prominent Democrats like Attorney General Maura Healey and Trump-appointed U.S. Attorney Andrew Lelling.

Lelling drew ire when he convinced a federal grand jury to indict Newton District Court Judge Shelley Richmond Joseph and a court officer on obstruction of justice charges. The charges stem from their alleged efforts to help an undocumented immigrant evade immigration authorities by allowing the defendant to slip out of their courthouse.

Lelling said he knew he was kicking a hornets' nest by going after a judge, but felt he needed to show that not even someone in a black robe is above the law. But Healey, among others, called it a "radical and politically motivated attack" for something that she said could have been handled by Commission on Judicial Conduct or the Trial Court itself.

While this case bears watching, the House budget debate did not.

As has become custom, new spending was packed on through large, earmark-filled consolidated amendments put together by the Ways and Means Committee and new chairman Aaron Michlewitz, who spent hours meeting privately with members in the infamous Room 348, otherwise known as the Members' Lounge, to discuss priorities.

While any member can choose to have their amendment debated individually, only Rep. Russell Holmes did. The Mattapan Democrat made a plea for legislative pay reform that he said would bring equity to the system and take some stipend-related power away from the speaker.

Needless to say, it failed.

Instead, there was money added to help with the 2020 Census count and to support addiction treatment and recovery. More money was set aside for regional transit authorities and to support nursing homes, an industry hit yet again with bad news when Skyline Healthcare announced it was surrendering five more licenses for facilities on the South Coast.

And the policy debates, such as they were, were limited to brief explanations of what had been decided.

One of the bigger behind the scenes debates of the week centered around Gov. Charlie Baker's proposal to allow MassHealth to directly negotiate with drug manufacturers over the price of some of the costlier drugs on the market.

The Ways and Means Committee had largely endorsed the Baker plan, but after a strong lobbying campaign led by former House lawmaker Bob Coughlin and the Biotechnology Council, House leaders decided to pull back on some of the public disclosure and shaming elements that were considered by advocates to be the real teeth behind the effort.

The House's new plan is to allow for direct negotiations, but without the same threat of drug makers being forced to publicly answer questions or disclose pricing information and financials. And if they fail to comply with requests, there's no mechanism to invite the attorney general to get involved.

Majority Leader Ronald Mariano and Health Care Financing Committee Chairwoman Jennifer Benson explained that they were trying to strike a balance between cost control and not hurting a major employer group that has led to economic growth in areas like Kendall Square.

The House also took a stab at opening up a new market in Massachusetts for the processing of shell-on lobster parts, and tweaked the pricing requirements on bids for the next round of offshore wind contracts. The wind price reforms were an attempt by Speaker Pro Tempore Patricia Haddad and others to guarantee competition after the prices in the first round came in far lower than expected.

House Speaker Robert DeLeo declared the final product - which was Michlewitz's first as Ways and Means chairman - an "excellent piece of work." Overall, it increases state spending by about 3 percent over last year, including over $200 million in new funding for public schools.

On the other side of the building, the Senate packed its work into one day on Thursday when it finished the job of overriding Baker's veto of a bill to repeal a cap on family welfare benefits.

The Senate also passed a bill to allow people to choose a nonbinary gender designation of "X" on driver's licenses and birth certificates, and a road safety bill requiring bicycle tailights, safety mirrors on state-owned trucks and more.

On the campaign trail, U.S. Rep. Seth Moulton announced on "Good Morning America" on Monday that he would run for president, one of 20 Democrats seeking the 2020 nomination after former Vice President Joe Biden joined him this week.

Moulton's team says that the congressman plans to run for re-election to the House if his long-shot bid for the nomination doesn't pan out, but that hasn't stopped people from openly considering a run for his seat.

The list, according to the Boston Globe, includes former Rep. John Tierney, who was knocked out of Congress by Moulton and may be considering a comeback.

The transportation funding debate also got a shot in the arm this week from a poll released by MassINC Polling Group that showed widespread frustration with the state of road congestion and public transit reliability.

Sixty-six percent of voters said action was "urgently needed" to improve the state's transportation system, and 80 percent said they support the generic supposition that the state should raise new money to fix the problem.

The question is who should pay?

Baker, touting his own plans to invest $8 billion over the next five years in public transit and a comparable figure into road and bridge work, said additional taxes aren't needed, while Senate President Karen Spilka casually touched what has been a third rail in transportation politics for years – the idea of more toll roads.


State House News Service
Friday, April 26, 2019

Advances - Week of April 28, 2019


In the fiscal 2020 budget approved Thursday night by the Massachusetts House, lawmakers passed on the opportunity to adopt major new taxes or revenues to make the kind of investments in education and transportation that Democrats have been clamoring for since 2016. Now the action is shifting to the Senate, where leadership also appears uncertain about a path forward on revenue generation.

The Legislature's unspoken game plan this year appears to call for authorizing a larger than usual investment in K-12 public education for fiscal 2020, but punting until later this year, at the earliest, on the debate over taxes, a conversation complicated by Gov. Charlie Baker's thoughts.

The governor is simultaneously open to some new taxes (he's proposed a few of his own) while also opposed to increases in broad-based taxes, a category that his administration is loath to define other than specifying he's against increasing the income or sales taxes.

After misplaying their push for new taxes on the wealthy to pay for education and transportation investments, Democrats are now in the position of choosing between coming up with a tax package that might survive a Baker veto or playing the governor's game and trying to wedge big investments in those areas into the nearly $43 billion budget without coming up with new revenues.

The House so far this year has adopted Baker's approach, although House leaders say they'll hold a revenue debate this year. The stakes are high. The outcome of this slowly unfolding drama, as well as debates over reform proposals, will determine how far the state can go in addressing traffic congestion, subpar MBTA service, zip code-based inequities in public education, the affordability crisis in higher education, and the state's economic competitiveness.

The nearly $43 billion House budget will soon officially be in the custody of new Senate Ways and Means Chairman Michael Rodrigues of Westport. The Senate will work off the same revenue assumptions as Baker and the House, although everyone on Beacon Hill has an eye on April revenue collections, due out next week, to better gauge the strength or weakness of tax collections that facilitate all of the spending lawmakers promote during springtime budget deliberations....

The break before May's Senate budget deliberations gives lawmakers an opportunity to dive back into public hearings on bills. Topics on the docket for next week include investing in public higher education, protecting people with intellectual or developmental disabilities, public housing, workforce development and union benefits, as well as bills dealing with hate crimes, hazing and abortion. Senate aides say they plan to follow the budget rollout and deliberation cycle used in prior years, which featured debate the week before Memorial Day.


IN THE SENATE

State House News Service
Thursday, April 25, 2019

More tolled roads deserve consideration, Spilka says
By Chris Lisinski


Expanding road tolls across Massachusetts and to the state's borders could be a way to generate new revenue to address growing transportation woes, Senate President Karen Spilka said Thursday.

In remarks at a Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce breakfast Thursday, Spilka, an Ashland Democrat, told business leaders that tolls similar to those along Interstate 90 deserve consideration for other places.

"Simply put, and I put this out there, if tolls are a good idea for my district, my region, I believe we should explore the possibility of expanded tolling, including possibly at our borders," Spilka said. "Our best ideas won't matter if we can't find a way to make a 21st century transportation infrastructure a reality — and find a way to pay for it."

Spilka also mentioned congestion pricing, an idea other lawmakers on Beacon Hill have frequently raised, as a way to address worsening traffic and infrastructure. Echoing a similar comment made last month by House Speaker Robert DeLeo, Spilka told the audience that no proposal should be "off the table."

The Legislature, she said, must soon take up "an honest and clear-eyed conversation about how we will pay for the proposed solutions to our complex challenges."

Her remarks came a day after the release of a MassINC poll finding a majority of employees across the state have experienced anger at delays on their daily commutes. Gov. Charlie Baker, speaking in the wake of the poll on Wednesday, said he does not believe any new taxes are necessary to improve transportation, citing his administration's plan to invest historic levels of funding in the next five years.

"I don't believe that raising taxes is the answer to this problem at this point in time," he said this week.

DeLeo said last month that all transportation revenue options are still "on the table," although representatives do not plan to debate the topic until some time later this year.

Spilka did not outline a timeframe for taking up road tolls or other forms of transportation revenue.

Sen. Brendan Crighton filed a bill (S 2060) calling for a Department of Transportation study about expanding tolls, but no action has been taken on that legislation since it was referred to committee in January.

In an interview with the News Service after the event, Spilka said it was "premature" to say how the Senate plans to approach the transportation revenue conversation.

"I'd like to defer that question for a few weeks or a month or so until we dive into this a little bit more," she said. "There are a lot of needs. I'm not certain how you solve those with just fixes, not counting revenue. I don't know if it's possible at this point."

Spilka said Joint Committee on Transportation Co-chair Sen. Joseph Boncore — who himself has filed bills calling for peak pricing on ride-hailing apps and for congestion tolls — will lead lawmakers in studying the issue. She also pointed to a new Senate working group led by Sen. Adam Hinds that will take a comprehensive look at the state's tax code with a goal of informing legislation for the 2021-2022 session.

It's not clear if lawmakers view the House budget being debated this week as a "money bill," a designation that would allow the Senate to add in new revenues when they take it up next month. Spilka said Thursday she is not sure if the current version is a money bill and is awaiting the final House vote.

The House on Thursday added a rider to its budget expanding a land conservation tax credit.

Spilka's speech focused on other key issue areas beyond transportation, too. She announced that the Senate budget would also include a new $10 million fund for mental health initiatives, and she told attendees not to be surprised if the Senate's budget includes "record levels" of Chapter 70 education funding - a pool of money that rises in each state budget.

Spilka would not say exactly what her budget's education funding would be, but she touted the Senate's previous votes in favor of fully implementing reforms recommended by the Foundation Budget Review Commission and said the chamber would "put its money where its mouth is when it comes to education."

"If you look at the last few years, this has been the Senate priority," Spilka told the News Service. "I believe it will be this year as well."

She tied together her remarks by suggesting that a wide range of legislative priorities can all be considered through two lenses: climate change and economic development.

To drive home the latter point — particularly relevant for an audience of hundreds of small and large business leaders — Spilka described the cost carried by many of the region's most significant challenges. Bad commutes leave workers dissatisfied and willing to look elsewhere for jobs, she said, education inequality leaves a portion of the population unable to succeed financially, and a Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation study estimated the state loses $2.7 billion a year in business productivity as a result of the opioid epidemic.

"The key challenge before us, I believe, is safeguarding and maintaining the economic vibrancy and vitality of our state," Spilka said. "That’s why I believe that it's very important to emphasize that every policy issue that we face this session is also an economic development issue."


State House News Service
Thursday, April 25, 2019

Lawmakers lift cap on family welfare benefits
By Colin A. Young


While the House continued sorting through hundreds of budget amendments, the Senate on Thursday churned through policy debates in a compact session. The session began with senators voting 37-3 to override Gov. Charlie Baker's veto of legislation lifting a 1990s-era state policy barring families receiving public assistance benefits from getting additional benefits when another child is born.

The Senate then heard an inaugural speech from Sen. Jo Comerford, who spoke about a bill to give adults three options when indicating gender on state identification records -- male, female or "X." That bill, after being amended on the floor, was passed 39-1.

To wrap up its Thursday, the Senate voted unanimously to pass a road safety bill focused on pedestrian and bicyclist safety. The Senate will return on Monday for an informal session.

A Senate vote Thursday passed into law over Gov. Charlie Baker's veto legislation lifting a 1990s-era state policy barring families receiving public assistance benefits from getting additional benefits when another child is born.

Sen. Sal DiDomenico, who has long been pushing to eliminate the so-called cap on kids, said it was the sixth time the Senate voted to do away with the policy.

"We will once and for all put this policy out of business," the Everett Democrat said before the Senate voted 37-3 to override Baker's veto. Three of the Senate's six Republicans -- Sens. Vinny deMacedo, Ryan Fattman and Donald Humason -- voted to sustain the governor's veto.

The bill (H 3594) previously passed the House 155-1 and the Senate 37-1, so overriding the governor with the necessary two-thirds support was not in doubt. The House voted in favor of an override two weeks ago.

Baker had said that he did not oppose lifting the cap, but wanted additional welfare system reforms to be included in the bill. The Legislature showed little interest in Baker's proposals.

"Lifting the Cap on Kids will make a critical difference in the lives of 8,700 of the lowest income children in Massachusetts," Deborah Harris of the Massachusetts Law Reform Institute said. "With today's vote, Massachusetts has affirmed the dignity and humanity of every child."

The bill includes a preamble that makes the change effective immediately and the Legislature made its cap lift retroactive to January. The Baker administration now has until September to calculate benefits so families receive the proper amount retroactive back to Jan. 1, according to advocates.

 

NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml


Citizens for Limited Taxation    PO Box 1147    Marblehead, MA 01945    (781) 639-9709

BACK TO CLT HOMEPAGE