A PROMISE TO KEEP: 5%
A Ballot Committee of Citizens for Limited Taxation

 

The Boston Herald
Wednesday, November 8, 2000

Opposing change, taking $: Tax rollback appeals to voters 
by Jack Sullivan


Massachusetts voters spoke through their wallets yesterday by giving themselves the biggest tax cut in state history, but opted not to blow up the health care system in two of eight ballot questions.

In addition, voters rejected a plea by animal rights activists to shut down the state's greyhound racing industry and stripped inmates of the right to vote.

Question 4: The decision will mean the state income tax will be rolled back from its current 5.85 percent to 5 percent over the next three years, about $450 annually for the average family of four.

Voters appeared to agree with Gov. Paul Cellucci that the state was awash in surplus money and decided they would rather have the $1.2 billion in their own pocket rather than let legislators spend it.

"What a great victory for the future of Massachusetts," Cellucci said. "The voters of this state have sent a strong message ... about fiscal discipline. We've sent a message across America tonight."

But while the rollback supporters cruised to a seemingly comfortable victory, the margin was much tighter at the end than polls had shown several months ago, when support reached 77 percent.

Jack McCarthy, campaign manager for the anti-rollback Campaign for Massachusetts Future, said those who read the question for the first time in the voting booth likely voted in favor of the measure because of its appeal.

"We had the tougher battle," McCarthy said last night. "We had to convince people not to take a tax cut."


NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml