A PROMISE TO KEEP: 5%
A Ballot Committee of Citizens for Limited Taxation

 

The Boston Herald
Monday, November 6, 2000

Unions flex muscle in fighting tax cut
by Eric Convey


If ballot question 4 fails tomorrow, opponents may stamp a "union made" label on the final tally sheet.

Organizers of the anti-4 effort spent much of the weekend preparing to blitz all the state's 2,100-plus polling places Tuesday.

Thousands of activists will try to convince voters that rolling back the state income tax to 5 percent from 5.85 percent over three years would impair the commonwealth's ability to provide good schools and highways.

"We're going to cover as many polling places as we can on Tuesday," said Jack McCarthy, spokesman for the anti-4 Campaign for Massachusetts' Future.

"Where you can get close enough to hand out palm cards on Tuesday, we'll do that. We'll have signs everywhere else."

Opponents of the ballot question also plan to continue their television campaign through today.

McCarthy said the medium has been essential in building momentum against the ballot question, which Gov. Paul Cellucci has aggressively promoted in recent weeks.

A Boston Herald/WCVB-TV Channel 5 poll released yesterday indicated voters favored the tax cut 47 percent to 37 percent -- a substantial erosion of support over the past few months.

Meanwhile, grassroots efforts continue.

Service Employees International Union Local 285's union offices have been "cleaned out" for the past few weeks and dedicated to the anti-4 effort, one union organizer who spoke on the condition of anonymity said.

"That's all they're working on."

Boston-area Teamsters have not been visible in the anti-4 effort, but members of the union have been more active in western Massachusetts, especially the Springfield area.

Firefighters have also been part of the effort to defeat the question.

While publicly arguing that Question 4 would hurt the state's ability to deliver services, some union leaders have said on background that they're especially concerned that draining the state's coffers an estimated $1.2 billion per year would jeopardize jobs.

Cellucci counters that the state can afford the cut and that public-sector jobs will be more secure over the long haul if Massachusetts becomes more attractive to employers by lowering taxes.


NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml