A PROMISE TO KEEP: 5%
A Ballot Committee of Citizens for Limited Taxation

 

The Education Intelligence Agency
Communiqué 
October 2, 2000

NEA Spends Dues Increase to Influence Tax Rates
By Mike Antonucci


Flush with cash from its newly imposed $5 national dues increase, the National Education Association began spreading the wealth around at the most recent meeting of its board of directors. With millions set to go to California and Michigan to fight voucher initiatives, the destination of other money was, shall we say, educational.

* $500,000 to the Arizona Education Association to support Proposition 301, a bipartisan measure to increase the state sales tax and target the revenues for education.

* $350,000 to the Massachusetts Teachers Association to defeat two measures, Question 4 and Question 6. The first is designed to return state income tax rates to 5 percent from the current 5.95 percent, instituted as a "temporary" increase in 1990. The second measure would reduce motor vehicle taxes.

* $25,000 to the Arkansas Education Association to defeat Amendment 4, which would reduce the state sales tax.

In addition, NEA will send $450,000 to the Washington Education Association to support Initiative 732, which would require automatic annual cost-of-living increases to teacher salaries statewide. It also bears noting that the Nevada State Education Association has qualified a petition to institute a four percent business tax in the state. If the 2001 Nevada Legislature fails to pass the measure, NSEA is free to place the proposal before the electorate as an initiative in 2002.

In all the debate at the NEA Representative Assembly over the dues increase, one fact never came up: Ballot initiatives rarely appear in off years. NEA thus has more than $14 million to spend on this year's initiatives, if necessary....


NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml