Post Office Box 1147    Marblehead, Massachusetts 01945    (781) 639-9709
“Every Tax is a Pay Cut ... A Tax Cut is a Pay Raise”

47 years as “The Voice of Massachusetts Taxpayers”
and their Institutional Memory


Help save yourself join CLT today!


CLT introduction  and membership  application

What CLT saves you from the auto excise tax alone

Make a contribution to support CLT's work by clicking the button above

Ask your friends to join too

Visit CLT on Facebook

Barbara Anderson's Great Moments

Follow CLT on Twitter

CLT UPDATE
Sunday, June 20, 2021

Post-Pandemic Politics


Jump directly to CLT's Commentary on the News


Most Relevant News Excerpts
(Full news reports follow Commentary)

The Fair Share Amendment establishes through law a "millionaire's tax" that is actually a graduated income tax. It allows the state to impose a four percent surcharge on so-called millionaires. Make no mistake about it, before long the millionaire's tax will become the "thousandaire tax" when lawmakers run out of money again.

In other words, you get to vote to change the world's oldest functioning constitution next year in order to sock it to those dirty millionaires. Lawmakers have launched an ad blitz to convince you that the wealthy are the bad guys. To be successful is to be punished and treated unfairly. It's class warfare, us against the rich.

As a result "the rich" will flee Massachusetts, as will businesses, as they've done in other states where this has been attempted. Along with them, investments, jobs, and tax revenues will disappear as well.

Massachusetts voters have traditionally rejected the concept of a graduated income tax in the past and should again. This is corruption at its finest. The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has already struck it down as unconstitutional and that is why the crooks on Bacon Hill are attempting to change the constitution.

Vote no on the "Fair Share Amendment" when it appears on the ballot next year.

WBSM 1420-AM
Tuesday, June 15, 2021
Massachusetts' Fair Share Amendment Is A Pile Of Garbage
By Barry Richard


A new study revealed that Americans are continuing to flee New York and California for places like Texas and Florida in recent months.

“Despite the 2020 pandemic, this year Americans are following similar moving trends as prior years. Millions of Americans are moving either to start a new job or to move home,” said a report from North American Van Lines, a trucking and moving company.

Specifically, it noted that Americans “are fleeing” California to Texas and Idaho, although New York, New Jersey, and Illinois “are the three states with the most outbound moves.” Other states that have seen a mass exodus of people, the report said, are Michigan and Pennsylvania....

“The average long-distance mover relocated to a ZIP code with home values nearly $27,000 lower than where they came from last year,” its report said. “U.S. movers in 2020 relocated to ZIP codes with homes 33 square feet larger than where they came from, on average.”

Zillow used data from North American Van Lines to find ["The opportunity, emotion and trends behind the Great Reshuffling"] that “movers that changed states in 2020 moved to areas with homes that were, on average, both larger and less-pricey than in the areas they moved from.” That finding, according to the analysis, is a “notable reversal” of previous years’ trends.

The Epoch Times
Tuesday, June 15, 2021
Americans Are Fleeing California and New York for Florida and Texas: Study


State lawmakers on Thursday agreed to schedule this year's sales tax holiday for the weekend of August 14 and 15.

A 2018 law that put the state's minimum hourly wage on a gradual path to $15 and created the paid family and medical leave program also made the holiday, when the 6.25 percent sales tax is waived for many purchases, an annual fixture and tasked the Legislature with picking an exact date each August.

The House and Senate each adopted a resolution (S 2487) setting August 14 and 15 as this year's dates....

Through May, the state had collected $30.451 billion in tax revenue, an increase of 23 percent over the same 11 months of fiscal 2020 and $3.938 billion above the revenue department's expectations.

State House News Service
Thursday, June 17, 2021
Legislature Calls For Aug. 14-15 Sales Tax Holiday


With a bill that would extend authorization for virtual public meetings now on Gov. Charlie Baker's desk, advocacy groups are calling on lawmakers to make remote meeting access permanent.

Groups including the ACLU of Massachusetts, Massachusetts Newspaper Publishers Association, Boston Center for Independent Living, MASSPIRG and the New England First Amendment Coalition support legislation (H 3152, S 2082), filed by Rep. Denise Garlick and Sen. Jason Lewis, that would require a remote access component at public meetings.

"We need a permanent system requiring in-person meetings while also allowing online access for citizens who cannot be in the room," said Justin Silverman of the New England First Amendment Coalition. "It's a matter of access and public oversight."

State and local government entities shifted many proceedings online during the pandemic, which advocates say opened up participation to people who could not attend in-person, including those with disabilities, lack of transportation, or work and caregiving responsibilities.

State House News Service
Wednesday, June 16, 2021
Remote Meetings Hailed as Major Public Access Reform


Governor Charlie Baker is pursuing his own plans to spend more than half of Massachusetts’ $5.3 billion federal stimulus windfall, with $1 billion in housing initiatives at the top of his priority list. Though he could run into resistance from leaders in the Legislature who want to control the purse strings.

The Republican governor is filing a measure Thursday that would set aside $2.8 billion of that federal aid to address a variety of his key priorities: Housing and homeownership, economic development, job training, mental and emotional health, and water-and-sewer infrastructure. He would leave most of the rest for the Legislature to allocate.

The proposal marks the latest twist in a tango between Baker and the Democrat-led Legislature over how to spend the state’s share of American Rescue Plan Act proceeds. Baker maintains he has the authority, at least right now, to spend the full amount as he chooses.

The Legislature earlier this month sent him a brief piece of legislation that would divert the state’s ARPA money into a fund state lawmakers control. Baker is seeking to amend this bill, by leaving $2.3 billion for them to divvy up....

[Baker] also did not heed the business community’s request to set aside money to help pay for the state’s huge unemployment insurance costs, which ballooned last year during the pandemic. Baker pointed to a recently-signed bill that spreads the hike in what’s called the solvency assessment over 20 years, to spread out $7 billion in unemployment payments tied to pandemic-related job losses. Businesses, even those without any layoffs in 2020, had been faced with an unexpected additional cost of as much as $1,300 per worker this year before that “fix” became law. Baker said there will be a “big sigh of relief” when employers get their new bills.

The Boston Globe
Thursday, June 17, 2021
Baker looks to spend half of state’s $5b stimulus windfall quickly ...
setting himself up for a conflict with the Legislature


In an attempt to end the battle over who gets to spend nearly $5.2 billion in federal relief money, Gov. Charlie Baker on Thursday pitched a plan that would see him cede much of his control over the aid to the Legislature, as long as lawmakers agree quickly to spend more than half on priorities such as home ownership assistance, substance abuse treatment and job training....

The governor made his pitch on the same day he faced a deadline to act on a bill passed by the Legislature that would sweep nearly $5.18 billion in American Rescue Plan Act funding into the Coronavirus State Fiscal Recovery Fund. That fund is subject to appropriation by lawmakers, meaning the APRA relief funding would go through a more traditional budgeting process.

"While we're willing to agree to move this aid into a separate fund, we need to work together to get part of this funding out the door to start addressing the immediate needs we have in our communities across the commonwealth," Baker said.

The governor has asserted that he does not need legislative approval to spend the federal relief money, but said Thursday he was willing to meet Democratic leaders half-way. The governor returned the bill (H 3827) with an amendment that would allow the full amount to be transferred to the trust fund, but would also appropriate more than half of it immediately.

If he had vetoed the bill, House and Senate leaders likely would have had the votes to override the governor....

House Speaker Ron Mariano and Senate President Karen Spilka didn't need to think too long, however, dismissing the governor's proposal mere hours after he made his case publicly.

"The Legislature has made clear its belief that appropriating American Rescue Plan funding must be done through a transparent and deliberative process. We appreciate the Governor’s spending proposal, but we continue to believe that this once in a generation opportunity demands a thoughtful public vetting. To that end, we will continue to pursue placing these one-time federal dollars, which were intended to be spent over multiple years, into the segregated fund so that we can hear from communities and stakeholders throughout the Commonwealth," Mariano and Spilka said in a statement....

Baker's return of the bill to the Legislature keeps the federal funding in limbo a month after Massachusetts received the lump sum aid through the American Rescue Plan Act.

Legislative leaders have not laid out a specific timetable for developing a spending plan of their own...

The Massachusetts chapter of the National Federation of Independent Businesses said it was "disappointed" Baker did not propose to use any money to replenish the unemployment insurance trust fund.

Baker recently partnered with lawmakers to relieve the sticker shock felt by businesses when they got their UI bills this spring by borrowing the money to recapitalize the depleted fund and allowing businesses to repay the money over 20 years.

Some states, however, have used chunks of their ARPA funding to rebuild their unemployment insurance trust funds and permanently reduce the debt burden on employers.

"The state-mandated restrictions and overly generous state benefits helped fuel the current UI crisis, and now the state should help employers pay for it," said NFIB State Director Christopher Carlozzi.

State House News Service
Thursday, June 17, 2021
Baker Outlines $2.8 Billion Rescue Act Spending Bill
Republican Guv to Legislature: Start Spending Now


Massachusetts employers added 9,200 jobs in May and the statewide unemployment rate fell 0.3 percentage points to 6.1 percent, labor officials announced Friday.

The pace of job gains slowed from the revised 10,200 positions businesses added in April, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics figures cited by the Executive Office of Labor and Workforce Development.

That continues a deceleration, from from 37,900 jobs added in January to 19,700 in February, 14,800 in March, 10,200 in April and now 9,200 in May....

Total employment, estimated based on a survey of employers, has increased in Massachusetts for five months straight and 12 of the past 13 months. The Bay State lost 691,000 jobs in March 2020 and April 2020, and since then has brought back about 406,600 jobs, less than 60 percent of the early losses.

Many business groups and smaller employers have warned lately that they are struggling to attract workers and fill open positions while the state pushes toward a post-pandemic economic recovery, citing factors ranging from the continued availability of supplemental unemployment benefits to a lack of available housing.

Gov. Charlie Baker on Thursday outlined plans to immediately spend $2.8 billion in American Rescue Plan Act funds to help further the economic recovery. His proposal drew a tepid initial response from legislators, who emphasized the importance of putting the ARPA money in a special fund while hearing more public feedback.

State House News Service
Friday, June 18, 2021
Pace of Mass. Job Gains Continued to Slow During May


The authorization for to-go alcohol sales by restaurants was one of the measures that lapsed for a little more than a day when the COVID-19 state of emergency lifted at 12:01 a.m. Tuesday but lawmakers hadn't yet completed a bill to extend popular policies linked to the emergency declaration.

So that they could reach a compromise at least on the same day that the emergency expired, the House and Senate sent Baker only a bill reflecting areas of common ground -- keeping to-go cocktails and outdoor dining around for a while longer, allowing but not requiring remote public meetings for entitites that opt for them, and extending eviction protections, for instance -- while opting to continue their talks on issues like mail-in voting and telehealth rates.

The roughly 33-hour window between the emergency's end and Baker's pen hitting the parchment Wednesday was shorter than the time in 2018 when horse racing and simulcasting became illegal for about 36 hours because lawmakers didn't finish a reauthorization bill in time. But it was still long enough to create headaches for restaurants trying to plan their operations and school committees, select boards and other entities wondering how, exactly, to hold their next meeting.

Incidentally, legislators never had to worry about their own remote-voting capabilities vanishing if they didn't ink a deal. They get that option not from the state's Open Meeting Law -- which doesn't apply to the House and Senate -- but under the emergency rules each branch adopted.

Those rules, it turns out, let Speaker Ronald Mariano cast his votes last week from Florida, an under-the-radar trip that only came to light after he disclosed this week that he'd been fitted for a pacemaker while in the Sunshine State.

STORY OF THE WEEK: Four hundred and sixty-two days later, Massachusetts emerges from the COVID-19 state of emergency.

State House News Service
Friday, June 18, 2021
Weekly Roundup - No Emergency Here


This is the time of year when the first indication of a likely overdue annual budget comes in the form of an interim budget filed by the governor and quickly approved by the Legislature to give negotiators more time to hammer out a final spending bill. House and Senate Democrats can avoid that if they reach a budget deal in the coming days. Unlike last year, when concerns over a revenue freefall and uncertainty about federal aid caused budget writers to intentionally put their annual budgeting exercises on hold, lawmakers this year say they are trying to get back on their old schedule.

But even before the pandemic, House and Senate Democrats had trouble meeting their annual July 1 budget deadline. The challenges this year are significantly different than past years and center largely on settling policy differences and not overspending at a time when Massachusetts taxpayers are giving Beacon Hill far more in tax revenue than the architects of the pending $47.7 billion budget proposals envisioned.

When combined with record amounts of federal aid, it's a revenue glut spiraling into the billions of dollars, the likes of which the state has never seen before. [Emphasis added]

And there's also a logjam of budget bills building behind the big annual budget. The House last week sent the Senate a $257 million fiscal 2021 supplemental budget (H 3871) that makes mail-in and expanded early voting permanent...

Storylines in Progress

As the wait for a State House reopening timeline continues, the building remains one of the few in the state without some kind of plan and lawmakers continue to be advised to participate in sessions remotely. Six months into the session, House and Senate Democrats also remain in disagreement over public access to committee votes and virtual testimony. And the House also has yet to even adopt its own permanent rules for this session ...

The Transportation Committee takes testimony next week on the proposal to make undocumented immigrants eligible for standard Massachusetts driver's licenses ...

State House News Service
Friday, June 18, 2021
Advances - Week of June 20


Chip Ford's CLT Commentary

Most of what's happened at the State House over the past week (and likely the coming weeks) has been dealing with the fallout of the pandemic the long-term consequences of the lockdown, this week's rediscovered freedom, and the dilemma of how to spend the combined $10 Billion windfall from some $5B of unexpected state tax revenue and over $5B in federal relief.  Dealing with the fallout and using it as an opportunity.  ("Never let a crisis go to waste!")

WBSM 1420-AM talk-show host Barry Richard on Tuesday wrote a column decrying the coming ballot question to crack the flat tax and take the first step toward a graduated income tax.  In "Massachusetts' Fair Share Amendment Is A Pile Of Garbage" he wrote:

The Fair Share Amendment establishes through law a "millionaire's tax" that is actually a graduated income tax. It allows the state to impose a four percent surcharge on so-called millionaires. Make no mistake about it, before long the millionaire's tax will become the "thousandaire tax" when lawmakers run out of money again.

In other words, you get to vote to change the world's oldest functioning constitution next year in order to sock it to those dirty millionaires. Lawmakers have launched an ad blitz to convince you that the wealthy are the bad guys. To be successful is to be punished and treated unfairly. It's class warfare, us against the rich.

As a result "the rich" will flee Massachusetts, as will businesses, as they've done in other states where this has been attempted. Along with them, investments, jobs, and tax revenues will disappear as well....

Vote no on the "Fair Share Amendment" when it appears on the ballot next year.

"The rich" aren't the only ones fleeing abusive, overly-taxed, and dysfunctional blue states.  This growing phenomenon now has its own name:  "The Great Reshuffling."

Zillow, the online real estate portal, noted in its April 6 2021 Mover Report ("The opportunity, emotion and trends behind the Great Reshuffling"):

“The pandemic brought an acceleration of trends we were seeing in 2018 and 2019,” said Zillow senior economist Jeff Tucker. “More affordable, medium-sized metro areas across the Sun Belt saw significantly more people coming than going, especially from more expensive, larger cities farther north and on the coasts.”

The Epoch Times reported on Tuesday ("Americans Are Fleeing California and New York for Florida and Texas: Study"):

A new study revealed that Americans are continuing to flee New York and California for places like Texas and Florida in recent months.

“Despite the 2020 pandemic, this year Americans are following similar moving trends as prior years. Millions of Americans are moving either to start a new job or to move home,” said a report from North American Van Lines, a trucking and moving company.

Specifically, it noted that Americans “are fleeing” California to Texas and Idaho, although New York, New Jersey, and Illinois “are the three states with the most outbound moves.” Other states that have seen a mass exodus of people, the report said, are Michigan and Pennsylvania.

Massachusetts' timing for potentially imposing a graduated income tax, motivating more productive taxpayers to flee for their life-savings if not their lives, couldn't be worse.  If the constitutional flat tax is cracked and a graduated income tax ever becomes law the proportion of dependents of state government's largesse will grow until it consumes all state revenue, requiring tax increases while driving out even more productive taxpayers along the way.  Such dogmatic and self-destructive blind greed would ignite the law of diminishing returns without end.  Well, there's always an end I suppose, though not necessarily pretty.


The State House News Service reported on Thursday ("Legislature Calls For Aug. 14-15 Sales Tax Holiday"):

State lawmakers on Thursday agreed to schedule this year's sales tax holiday for the weekend of August 14 and 15.

A 2018 law that put the state's minimum hourly wage on a gradual path to $15 and created the paid family and medical leave program also made the holiday, when the 6.25 percent sales tax is waived for many purchases, an annual fixture and tasked the Legislature with picking an exact date each August.

The House and Senate each adopted a resolution (S 2487) setting August 14 and 15 as this year's dates....

Through May, the state had collected $30.451 billion in tax revenue, an increase of 23 percent over the same 11 months of fiscal 2020 and $3.938 billion above the revenue department's expectations.

Barbara loved the annual sales tax holiday.  For weeks in advance she'd make lists of things to buy to last her for months, put off spending on them until the big day arrived to go on her celebratory shopping spree "to stick it to the man."  I couldn't be bothered.  She'd shop, I'd go sailing.

Then the Legislature ignored a sales tax holiday for a couple years, so the Mass. Retailers Association collected enough signatures (CLT helped) to put a sales tax reduction (from 6.25% down to 5%) on the 2018 ballot where it was expected to easily pass.  In the "Grand Bargain" the Legislature and Governor compromised with The Takers on different ballot questions they'd collected signatures to put on the ballot that could have crippled small businesses.  The Retailers Association in exchange dropped its sales tax question and got a promise of a guaranteed annual sales tax holiday and this is it.  Three years later the promise is still being kept.  So far so good.


"Never let a crisis go to waste" Part 1

The State House News Service reported on Wednesday ("Remote Meetings Hailed as Major Public Access Reform"):

With a bill that would extend authorization for virtual public meetings now on Gov. Charlie Baker's desk, advocacy groups are calling on lawmakers to make remote meeting access permanent.

Groups including the ACLU of Massachusetts, Massachusetts Newspaper Publishers Association, Boston Center for Independent Living, MASSPIRG and the New England First Amendment Coalition support legislation (H 3152, S 2082), filed by Rep. Denise Garlick and Sen. Jason Lewis, that would require a remote access component at public meetings.

"We need a permanent system requiring in-person meetings while also allowing online access for citizens who cannot be in the room," said Justin Silverman of the New England First Amendment Coalition. "It's a matter of access and public oversight."

State and local government entities shifted many proceedings online during the pandemic, which advocates say opened up participation to people who could not attend in-person, including those with disabilities, lack of transportation, or work and caregiving responsibilities.

"Never let a crisis go to waste" Part 2

State House News Service reported in its Weekly Roundup on Friday:

. . . But it was still long enough to create headaches for restaurants trying to plan their operations and school committees, select boards and other entities wondering how, exactly, to hold their next meeting.

Incidentally, legislators never had to worry about their own remote-voting capabilities vanishing if they didn't ink a deal. They get that option not from the state's Open Meeting Law -- which doesn't apply to the House and Senate -- but under the emergency rules each branch adopted.

Those rules, it turns out, let Speaker Ronald Mariano cast his votes last week from Florida, an under-the-radar trip that only came to light after he disclosed this week that he'd been fitted for a pacemaker while in the Sunshine State.

STORY OF THE WEEK: Four hundred and sixty-two days later, Massachusetts emerges from the COVID-19 state of emergency.

"Never let a crisis go to waste" Part 3

From the State House News Service's Advances - Week of June 20 on Friday:

Unlike last year, when concerns over a revenue freefall and uncertainty about federal aid caused budget writers to intentionally put their annual budgeting exercises on hold, lawmakers this year say they are trying to get back on their old schedule.

But even before the pandemic, House and Senate Democrats had trouble meeting their annual July 1 budget deadline. The challenges this year are significantly different than past years and center largely on settling policy differences and not overspending at a time when Massachusetts taxpayers are giving Beacon Hill far more in tax revenue than the architects of the pending $47.7 billion budget proposals envisioned.

When combined with record amounts of federal aid, it's a revenue glut spiraling into the billions of dollars, the likes of which the state has never seen before. [Emphasis added]

And there's also a logjam of budget bills building behind the big annual budget. The House last week sent the Senate a $257 million fiscal 2021 supplemental budget (H 3871) that makes mail-in and expanded early voting permanent...

Storylines in Progress

As the wait for a State House reopening timeline continues, the building remains one of the few in the state without some kind of plan and lawmakers continue to be advised to participate in sessions remotely. Six months into the session, House and Senate Democrats also remain in disagreement over public access to committee votes and virtual testimony. And the House also has yet to even adopt its own permanent rules for this session ...

The Transportation Committee takes testimony next week on the proposal to make undocumented immigrants eligible for standard Massachusetts driver's licenses ...

It would appear that many on Beacon Hill already are missing the advantages provided by a once-in-a-century pandemic.  Having conditioned the sheep and mushrooms to docility, apparently the intent now is to make many of their emergency responses and temporary provisions permanent.


The most interesting dynamic to observe is the growing battle over how that $10 Billion will be divvied up to be squandered a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for politicians looking to do what they do best; spend other peoples' money. 

"Governor Charlie Baker is pursuing his own plans to spend more than half of Massachusetts’ $5.3 billion federal stimulus windfall, with $1 billion in housing initiatives at the top of his priority list. Though he could run into resistance from leaders in the Legislature who want to control the purse strings,"  The Boston Globe reported on Thursday ("Baker looks to spend half of state’s $5b stimulus windfall quickly ... setting himself up for a conflict with the Legislature").

State House News Service reported the reaction on Thursday ("Baker Outlines $2.8 Billion Rescue Act Spending Bill
Republican Guv to Legislature: Start Spending Now
"):

House Speaker Ron Mariano and Senate President Karen Spilka didn't need to think too long, however, dismissing the governor's proposal mere hours after he made his case publicly.

"The Legislature has made clear its belief that appropriating American Rescue Plan funding must be done through a transparent and deliberative process. We appreciate the Governor’s spending proposal, but we continue to believe that this once in a generation opportunity demands a thoughtful public vetting. To that end, we will continue to pursue placing these one-time federal dollars, which were intended to be spent over multiple years, into the segregated fund so that we can hear from communities and stakeholders throughout the Commonwealth," Mariano and Spilka said in a statement.

With some $10 Billion of "free money" floating around the State House to get in the way is to get trampled.  Gov. Baker is trying to play fair, spending half himself and leaving the other half to legislative leaders.  Unfortunately Charlie doesn't realize that More Is Never Enough (MINE) and never will be.  Now we shall see just how much all his "bipartisanship" has been worth when there's a fortune on the table.


Notes from the Bluegrass State
"It doesn't need to be "The Massachusetts Way'"!

I broke away from my desk for a few hours yesterday morning, attended the Warren County Kentucky Republican Committee's first post-pandemic meeting, this one to select new officers for the coming year and the elections ahead.  I thought it was time I dipped my toes into local politics if for no other reason than self-preservation, to keep Kentucky Kentucky!

County government is the primary level of government in Kentucky.  Precincts are a division of each county not of municipalities as in Massachusetts.  I stumbled upon my new best friend here, Ron Cummings, while shopping for my new home back in 2018; he was my real estate broker and was also running for his first political office as one of the six county Fiscal Court magistrates (similar to county commissioners in Massachusetts when there was county government).  He won his first election that November and I left Massachusetts two weeks later.  Ron's been encouraging me to get involved in local politics; I thought this would be a good opportunity to see how it works and meet some like-minded new people (most welcome after a year-plus of forced solo isolation).

As an introduction (if anyone was interested) I brought along a copy of my political action résumé and my first column published in the local newspaper, "Lucky in Kentucky."  I met and was introduced to a lot of interesting and friendly folks.  The next thing I knew I'd been recruited and elected as my county precinct's vice-chairman (or is it "vice-captain")!  Never mind dipping my toes, that's getting both feet wet awfully fast.  Oh well, kind of fits the pattern.

While my focus remains on what I've invested my life for the past 35 years doing — informing Massachusetts taxpayers, defending them from a rapacious, oppressive state government — maybe I've found a hobby for myself, dabbling in a more sane political environment, and can perhaps expand life beyond staring at a computer screen 12, 14 hours every day of the week.

http://cltg.org/cltg/clt2021/images/21-06-19_WC-GOP_meeting.png

The Newest Recruit
Voting for County Officers
The rest of the members attending were sitting in rows along the back wall
behind we the elected among the precincts
 

Chip Ford
Executive Director


Full News Reports
(excerpted above)

WBSM 1420-AM
Tuesday, June 15, 2021
Massachusetts' Fair Share Amendment Is A Pile Of Garbage
By Barry Richard


Try as I might, I was unable to block out all of the news from home during my recent vacation. It's kind of difficult to do when you carry a pocket-sized computer around with you all day long.

One such news report involved the final passage of the so-called Fair Share Amendment by the Massachusetts Legislature. In doing so, the matter will now appear on the 2022 state ballot.

The Fair Share Amendment establishes through law a "millionaire's tax" that is actually a graduated income tax. It allows the state to impose a four percent surcharge on so-called millionaires. Make no mistake about it, before long the millionaire's tax will become the "thousandaire tax" when lawmakers run out of money again.

In other words, you get to vote to change the world's oldest functioning constitution next year in order to sock it to those dirty millionaires. Lawmakers have launched an ad blitz to convince you that the wealthy are the bad guys. To be successful is to be punished and treated unfairly. It's class warfare, us against the rich.

As a result "the rich" will flee Massachusetts, as will businesses, as they've done in other states where this has been attempted. Along with them, investments, jobs, and tax revenues will disappear as well.

Massachusetts voters have traditionally rejected the concept of a graduated income tax in the past and should again. This is corruption at its finest. The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has already struck it down as unconstitutional and that is why the crooks on Bacon Hill are attempting to change the constitution.

Vote no on the "Fair Share Amendment" when it appears on the ballot next year.

— Barry Richard is the host of The Barry Richard Show on 1420 WBSM New Bedford. He can be heard weekdays from noon to 3 p.m.


The Epoch Times
Tuesday, June 15, 2021
Americans Are Fleeing California and New York for Florida and Texas: Study
By Jack Phillips


A new study revealed that Americans are continuing to flee New York and California for places like Texas and Florida in recent months.

“Despite the 2020 pandemic, this year Americans are following similar moving trends as prior years. Millions of Americans are moving either to start a new job or to move home,” said a report from North American Van Lines, a trucking and moving company.

Specifically, it noted that Americans “are fleeing” California to Texas and Idaho, although New York, New Jersey, and Illinois “are the three states with the most outbound moves.” Other states that have seen a mass exodus of people, the report said, are Michigan and Pennsylvania.

“The top five inbound states in 2020 are Idaho, Arizona, Tennessee, South Carolina, and North Carolina, with Tennessee overtaking South Carolina from the 2019 results,” the report found.

North American Van Lines did not make mention of the widespread protests and riots last year, or the pandemic. Crime rates in some cities have also spiked amid the “defund the police” movement that became popular in the summer of 2020. In major cities like Los Angeles, San Francisco, Philadelphia, New York City, and Chicago, shootings and homicides saw upticks in 2020 and during the first six months of 2021.

But the report speculated that people might be leaving northeastern states due to the “harsh winters,” job availability as many firms “are avoiding the region” for now, and that many northeastern cities have a high cost of living that makes housing affordability more challenging.

The city that is most popular as a moving destination is now Phoenix, according to the report. The next on the list are Houston, Dallas, Atlanta, and Denver.

“With Texas’ warm climate and low taxes it’s not surprising that three of the top ten MSA [Metropolitan Statistical Area] destinations are in Texas,” the report noted.

Another report released this week from real estate website Zillow ["The opportunity, emotion and trends behind the Great Reshuffling"] confirmed that there has been a significant shift in where people are living now, saying that Americans are “reshuffling” to “larger” and “more-affordable homes.”

“The average long-distance mover relocated to a ZIP code with home values nearly $27,000 lower than where they came from last year,” its report said. “U.S. movers in 2020 relocated to ZIP codes with homes 33 square feet larger than where they came from, on average.”

Zillow used data from North American Van Lines to find that “movers that changed states in 2020 moved to areas with homes that were, on average, both larger and less-pricey than in the areas they moved from.” That finding, according to the analysis, is a “notable reversal” of previous years’ trends.


State House News Service
Thursday, June 17, 2021
Legislature Calls For Aug. 14-15 Sales Tax Holiday
By Katie Lannan


State lawmakers on Thursday agreed to schedule this year's sales tax holiday for the weekend of August 14 and 15.

A 2018 law that put the state's minimum hourly wage on a gradual path to $15 and created the paid family and medical leave program also made the holiday, when the 6.25 percent sales tax is waived for many purchases, an annual fixture and tasked the Legislature with picking an exact date each August.

The House and Senate each adopted a resolution (S 2487) setting August 14 and 15 as this year's dates.

"We invite all residents to go out and benefit from this opportunity as we incentivize investment in our businesses and continue the work of setting our economy on a path to post-pandemic recovery," Senate President Karen Spilka and House Speaker Ronald Mariano said in a statement.

The law directs the Legislature to adopt the joint resolution "not later than June 15," which was Tuesday, and says that if lawmakers fail to adopt the resolution, the revenue commissioner must designate a date by July 1. Last year, the Baker administration scheduled the weekend for August 29 and 30th.

A Department of Revenue spokesperson did not immediately respond to an email asking if the department would go along with the Legislature's chosen date or pursue something else in light of the missed deadline.

The holiday, in which the state agrees to give up revenue that would otherwise be collected in a bid to spur buying at local businesses, allows shoppers to avoid paying taxes on most retail items that cost less than $2,500.

Through May, the state had collected $30.451 billion in tax revenue, an increase of 23 percent over the same 11 months of fiscal 2020 and $3.938 billion above the revenue department's expectations.


State House News Service
Wednesday, June 16, 2021
Remote Meetings Hailed as Major Public Access Reform
By Katie Lannan


With a bill that would extend authorization for virtual public meetings now on Gov. Charlie Baker's desk, advocacy groups are calling on lawmakers to make remote meeting access permanent.

Groups including the ACLU of Massachusetts, Massachusetts Newspaper Publishers Association, Boston Center for Independent Living, MASSPIRG and the New England First Amendment Coalition support legislation (H 3152, S 2082), filed by Rep. Denise Garlick and Sen. Jason Lewis, that would require a remote access component at public meetings.

"We need a permanent system requiring in-person meetings while also allowing online access for citizens who cannot be in the room," said Justin Silverman of the New England First Amendment Coalition. "It's a matter of access and public oversight."

State and local government entities shifted many proceedings online during the pandemic, which advocates say opened up participation to people who could not attend in-person, including those with disabilities, lack of transportation, or work and caregiving responsibilities.

The bill lawmakers sent Baker Tuesday night (S 2475) would allow, but not require, public bodies to hold their meetings virtually through April 1, 2022, as long as they continue to offer a method of public access during those remote meetings.

"We commend the legislature for moving to allow remote public meetings until April 2022," ACLU of Massachusetts Executive Director Carol Rose said. "But we have concerns about what will happen as more and more state agencies and city halls reopen in person. Unless they also enable members of the public to join remotely, they will be shutting the door again on those members of the community who have always been left out of our political process."

Dianna Hu of the Boston Center for Independent Living compared remote participation to other accessibility features "that expanded to universal popularity," like curb cuts, elevators, closed captioning and audiobooks.


The Boston Globe
Thursday, June 17, 2021
Baker looks to spend half of state’s $5b stimulus windfall quickly, with housing topping the priority list
Governor could be setting himself up for a conflict with the Legislature over how to best spend the state’s federal allocation
By Jon Chesto


Governor Charlie Baker is pursuing his own plans to spend more than half of Massachusetts’ $5.3 billion federal stimulus windfall, with $1 billion in housing initiatives at the top of his priority list. Though he could run into resistance from leaders in the Legislature who want to control the purse strings.

The Republican governor is filing a measure Thursday that would set aside $2.8 billion of that federal aid to address a variety of his key priorities: Housing and homeownership, economic development, job training, mental and emotional health, and water-and-sewer infrastructure. He would leave most of the rest for the Legislature to allocate.

The proposal marks the latest twist in a tango between Baker and the Democrat-led Legislature over how to spend the state’s share of American Rescue Plan Act proceeds. Baker maintains he has the authority, at least right now, to spend the full amount as he chooses.

The Legislature earlier this month sent him a brief piece of legislation that would divert the state’s ARPA money into a fund state lawmakers control. Baker is seeking to amend this bill, by leaving $2.3 billion for them to divvy up. (About $194 million of the $5.3 billion has already been spent, with $109 million going to four hard-hit municipalities and $75 million to help subsidize the state’s new sick-leave law).

It’s unclear how much leeway the Legislature will give Baker. Legislative leaders could choose to further amend the bill or simply return it to him with the amendment excised. House Speaker Ronald Mariano and Senate President Karen Spilka have made it clear they prefer to use the legislative process to decide how to spend the full amount.

“Our objective here is to try to put some of these dollars to work in a hurry,” Baker said. “Let’s get started on this stuff, and they can use a more deliberative process to decide what happens with the other half.”

Baker noted that all the programs he’s funding have already been approved by lawmakers.

“Everything we’ve proposed is part of an existing program that the Legislature has already signed off in in the past,” he said. “What we’ve really done is turbocharge a number of these programs by putting very significant resources into them because we believe especially the investments in the communities that were hardest hit by COVID need to be made now.”

Baker is putting a clear priority on the state’s housing shortage, saying the need is more pressing than ever as Massachusetts emerges from the COVID-19 pandemic. Nearly one-third of his allocations would go to housing-related causes: $300 million for homeownership opportunities, $300 million to finance senior and veteran housing construction, $200 million to finance new housing for buyers with moderate incomes, and $200 million to help build more apartments.

He announced the funding Thursday afternoon outside a new housing development in Haverhill, and emphasized the importance of creating opportunities for lower-income and Black and Latino families — many of whom have been hit hard by the COVID-19 crisis — to buy and own homes.

“For the most part, people of color have either been directly or indirectly excluded from participating in [homeownership] programs. That has a lot to do with the difference in wealth between whites and people of color in this country,” he said. “We have an opportunity to do something about that and we should do it with this funding — and we should do it now.”

Baker also wants to spend $900 million of the federal funds on various infrastructure projects, ranging from addressing water-and-sewer issues to improving aging dams to fixing up state parks facilities.

His economic development portion would set aside up to $350 million to help with downtowns and other local business districts, and $100 million for cultural facilities and other tourism sites. He would pump $240 million into a suite of job training programs, with the hopes of addressing a labor shortage that is vexing employers. And he would set aside $225 million for healthcare, mostly for addiction treatment and other behavioral services, with some money for financially-distressed hospitals.

Baker said he did not address transit or childcare because those needs already have dedicated funding streams coming from the ARPA bill.

He also did not heed the business community’s request to set aside money to help pay for the state’s huge unemployment insurance costs, which ballooned last year during the pandemic. Baker pointed to a recently-signed bill that spreads the hike in what’s called the solvency assessment over 20 years, to spread out $7 billion in unemployment payments tied to pandemic-related job losses. Businesses, even those without any layoffs in 2020, had been faced with an unexpected additional cost of as much as $1,300 per worker this year before that “fix” became law. Baker said there will be a “big sigh of relief” when employers get their new bills.

Baker said he has had “high level” discussions with legislative leaders about the proposal, at least making it clear the administration would put forth its own proposal for how the federal stimulus money should be spent.

“What I’m trying to do here is make a proposal that would get a bunch of stuff going that we believe needs to get going now,” Baker said. “Here are the things we think we should do to jump-start the economy.”


State House News Service
Thursday, June 17, 2021
Baker Outlines $2.8 Billion Rescue Act Spending Bill
Republican Guv to Legislature: Start Spending Now
By Matt Murphy


In an attempt to end the battle over who gets to spend nearly $5.2 billion in federal relief money, Gov. Charlie Baker on Thursday pitched a plan that would see him cede much of his control over the aid to the Legislature, as long as lawmakers agree quickly to spend more than half on priorities such as home ownership assistance, substance abuse treatment and job training.

Baker visited a new housing development in Haverhill on Thursday where he detailed his proposal to allocate about $2.8 billion in federal relief money, attaching a sense of urgency to a plan that would also allow the Legislature to determine for itself how to spend the remaining funds.

http://cltg.org/cltg/clt2021/images/21-06-17_Proposed_ARPA_Spending.jpg
Gov. Charlie Baker's proposed American Rescue Plan Act spending

The governor made his pitch on the same day he faced a deadline to act on a bill passed by the Legislature that would sweep nearly $5.18 billion in American Rescue Plan Act funding into the Coronavirus State Fiscal Recovery Fund. That fund is subject to appropriation by lawmakers, meaning the APRA relief funding would go through a more traditional budgeting process.

"While we're willing to agree to move this aid into a separate fund, we need to work together to get part of this funding out the door to start addressing the immediate needs we have in our communities across the commonwealth," Baker said.

The governor has asserted that he does not need legislative approval to spend the federal relief money, but said Thursday he was willing to meet Democratic leaders half-way. The governor returned the bill (H 3827) with an amendment that would allow the full amount to be transferred to the trust fund, but would also appropriate more than half of it immediately.

If he had vetoed the bill, House and Senate leaders likely would have had the votes to override the governor. But with his spending plan, which gives Democrats a vehicle to begin advancing their own ARPA spending bill, the Republican governor gave lawmakers something new to think about.

House Speaker Ron Mariano and Senate President Karen Spilka didn't need to think too long, however, dismissing the governor's proposal mere hours after he made his case publicly.

"The Legislature has made clear its belief that appropriating American Rescue Plan funding must be done through a transparent and deliberative process. We appreciate the Governor’s spending proposal, but we continue to believe that this once in a generation opportunity demands a thoughtful public vetting. To that end, we will continue to pursue placing these one-time federal dollars, which were intended to be spent over multiple years, into the segregated fund so that we can hear from communities and stakeholders throughout the Commonwealth," Mariano and Spilka said in a statement.

Overall, the governor proposed putting $1 billion toward housing, including $300 million earmarked to help first-time home buyers in communities of color disproportionately impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.

His amendment proposes another $200 million to support housing production through the CommonWealth Builder program, $200 million for rental housing production and $300 million for supportive senior and veteran housing.

"Folks in these communities are going to have a harder time getting back to work and a harder time getting back on their feet the longer we go thinking about how to spend this money," Baker said. "And we chose areas that we that we believe the Legislature will be every bit as interested in spending resources on quickly as we are."

The spending plan also includes hundreds of millions of dollars for job training, broadband internet infrastructure, addiction treatment and behavioral health, downtown development, tourism and nearly $1 billion for parks, culverts, dams, water and sewer infrastructure and other climate change resiliency projects.

"This $2.8 billion plan will jump-start our recovery, and it keeps the focus where it needs to be on the families and communities that have been hardest hit by the virus, and by the pandemic," Baker said.

Baker's return of the bill to the Legislature keeps the federal funding in limbo a month after Massachusetts received the lump sum aid through the American Rescue Plan Act.

Legislative leaders have not laid out a specific timetable for developing a spending plan of their own, but Baker said he was reticent to just start spending the relief money on his own with the House and Senate on record as wanting more control over how the funding gets spread around. Mariano previously mentioned decisions could be made "around June."

"I think we're trying to pursue this in what I would describe as a good faith manner," Baker said.

Mariano and Spilka said they would consider Baker's priorities, but made no commitments on timing or how they would prioritize the money.

"As this process unfolds, we will consider the Governor's proposal and the worthy causes he identified as we collaborate with all parties to ensure a robust, sustained, and equitable recovery," the Democratic leaders said.

The governor has already released $109 million from the $5.3 billion in ARPA funding for Massachusetts to the cities of Chelsea, Everett, Methuen and Randolph who missed out on a chunk of federal aid due to quirks in the federal funding formula.

Earlier this week, he also said he intended to use ARPA funding to pay for a new vaccine Lottery.

The "VaxMillions" giveaway rolled out by Baker and Treasure Deb Goldberg is intended to encourage unvaccinated residents to get the shot and features 10 prizes totaling $6.5 million, including five $1 million prizes, and five scholarships of $300,000 each for entrants under 18.

The Massachusetts chapter of the National Federation of Independent Businesses said it was "disappointed" Baker did not propose to use any money to replenish the unemployment insurance trust fund.

Baker recently partnered with lawmakers to relieve the sticker shock felt by businesses when they got their UI bills this spring by borrowing the money to recapitalize the depleted fund and allowing businesses to repay the money over 20 years.

Some states, however, have used chunks of their ARPA funding to rebuild their unemployment insurance trust funds and permanently reduce the debt burden on employers.

"The state-mandated restrictions and overly generous state benefits helped fuel the current UI crisis, and now the state should help employers pay for it," said NFIB State Director Christopher Carlozzi.

Other groups reacted warmly to the governor's plan.

Deb Markowitz, state director of The Nature Conservancy in Massachusetts, said the governor's proposed use of the federal funding would help by "fostering healthy communities, providing clean water, addressing the impacts of climate change, and supporting our natural and working lands."

"This type of bipartisan collaboration between our federal and state policymakers is essential for our nation to achieve a green recovery," Markowitz said.


State House News Service
Friday, June 18, 2021
Pace of Mass. Job Gains Continued to Slow During May
By Chris Lisinski


Massachusetts employers added 9,200 jobs in May and the statewide unemployment rate fell 0.3 percentage points to 6.1 percent, labor officials announced Friday.

The pace of job gains slowed from the revised 10,200 positions businesses added in April, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics figures cited by the Executive Office of Labor and Workforce Development.

That continues a deceleration, from from 37,900 jobs added in January to 19,700 in February, 14,800 in March, 10,200 in April and now 9,200 in May.

The unemployment rate dropped from a revised April 2021 rate of 6.4 percent to 6.1 percent in May. The jobless rate stood at 16.4 percent in April 2020, but remains more than twice as high as the 2.7 percent unemployment rate from right before COVID-19 upended public life.

Total employment, estimated based on a survey of employers, has increased in Massachusetts for five months straight and 12 of the past 13 months. The Bay State lost 691,000 jobs in March 2020 and April 2020, and since then has brought back about 406,600 jobs, less than 60 percent of the early losses.

Many business groups and smaller employers have warned lately that they are struggling to attract workers and fill open positions while the state pushes toward a post-pandemic economic recovery, citing factors ranging from the continued availability of supplemental unemployment benefits to a lack of available housing.

Gov. Charlie Baker on Thursday outlined plans to immediately spend $2.8 billion in American Rescue Plan Act funds to help further the economic recovery. His proposal drew a tepid initial response from legislators, who emphasized the importance of putting the ARPA money in a special fund while hearing more public feedback.


State House News Service
Friday, June 18, 2021
Weekly Roundup - No Emergency Here
Recap and analysis of the week in state government
By Katie Lannan


An Old Fashioned and a historical commission meeting? A Manhattan and city council? A Ward 8 to go with the election commission, or maybe just an espresso martini to complement yet another night of Town Meeting?

However you prefer to combine takeout cocktails and remote public meetings (or to partake in each separately), lawmakers and Gov. Charlie Baker this week said it's OK for you to keep at it, aside from a brief blip Tuesday.

But if you were following the Legislature's progress toward reaching that deal via livestream Tuesday night, though, your beverage options were limited to whatever was on hand.

The authorization for to-go alcohol sales by restaurants was one of the measures that lapsed for a little more than a day when the COVID-19 state of emergency lifted at 12:01 a.m. Tuesday but lawmakers hadn't yet completed a bill to extend popular policies linked to the emergency declaration.

So that they could reach a compromise at least on the same day that the emergency expired, the House and Senate sent Baker only a bill reflecting areas of common ground -- keeping to-go cocktails and outdoor dining around for a while longer, allowing but not requiring remote public meetings for entitites that opt for them, and extending eviction protections, for instance -- while opting to continue their talks on issues like mail-in voting and telehealth rates.

The roughly 33-hour window between the emergency's end and Baker's pen hitting the parchment Wednesday was shorter than the time in 2018 when horse racing and simulcasting became illegal for about 36 hours because lawmakers didn't finish a reauthorization bill in time. But it was still long enough to create headaches for restaurants trying to plan their operations and school committees, select boards and other entities wondering how, exactly, to hold their next meeting.

Incidentally, legislators never had to worry about their own remote-voting capabilities vanishing if they didn't ink a deal. They get that option not from the state's Open Meeting Law -- which doesn't apply to the House and Senate -- but under the emergency rules each branch adopted.

Those rules, it turns out, let Speaker Ronald Mariano cast his votes last week from Florida, an under-the-radar trip that only came to light after he disclosed this week that he'd been fitted for a pacemaker while in the Sunshine State.

It was a different sort of road show this week for Baker, who hit Bridgewater and West Boylston and Springfield and Haverhill and Worcester for public events. Aside from a vaccine clinic visit in Springfield, these weren't the coronavirus-focused, public health data-heavy updates that have been typical over the past year-plus. (And in some cases, they weren't livestreamed on the state's website, in another transition away from a pandemic-era norm that has had the side effect of expanding public access to state government)

Instead, they included a statue dedication, a ribbon-cutting, a roundtable discussion about early college and a capital budget announcement -- the kinds of events with crowds and handshakes that Baker often talked about missing when social distancing was at its peak.

As in many cases where folks have been returning to their pre-COVID routines, atmospheres at times bordered on giddy. During the governor's Wednesday visit to Springfield's White Lion Brewing Company, the beer-related quips flowed as if on tap.

"I'm so excited to be outside!" MassHousing Executive Director Chrystal Kornegay exclaimed the next day as she took the mic at a new townhome development in Haverhill, where Baker put forward a new plan for using a lot of the state's American Rescue Plan Act money.

Legislative leaders didn't appear quite as enthusiastic.

Baker and the Legislature have been at odds over who should control the state's more than $5 billion in federal ARPA funds, and it looks like they'll stay that way a while longer.

Last week, the House and Senate sent Baker a bill that would transfer the money into a dedicated fund, from which lawmakers could appropriate it in something akin to the normal budgetary process. Baker has maintained he doesn't need their approval to spend the money.

Trying his hand at a compromise, Baker returned the bill with an amendment that would sweep the full amount of the money into the fund but put about $2.8 million to work right away on what he sees as urgent priorities, like housing, economic development, workforce training, health care and infrastructure.

The response from Mariano and Senate President Karen Spilka? Nice try, but we still like our idea better.

The two Democrats said they appreciated Baker's proposal, but would "continue to pursue placing these one-time federal dollars, which were intended to be spent over multiple years, into the segregated fund so that we can hear from communities and stakeholders throughout the Commonwealth." They said they'd keep Baker's suggestions in mind as they do.

Even before returning the COVID-19 fund bill with his amendment, Baker announced another way he planned to use some of the ARPA money -- to fund a "VaxMillions" lottery incentive, with vaccinated individuals able to enter for a chance to win cash prizes and college scholarships.

Baker and Treasurer Deborah Goldberg rolled out the COVID-19 shot lottery the same day that Massachusetts crossed the milestone of 4 million full vaccinations, inching closer to Baker's 4.1 million goal.

As the emergency officially ended and the state's COVID-19 command center wound down, the governor set a new vaccine target.

"More," he said. "The new number is more."

Meanwhile, the early pandemic response and the uneven toll borne by different sectors of the population were a main focus of Harvard professor Danielle Allen's gubernatorial campaign launch on Boston Common.

"The powerful plainly abandoned the powerless, and the pain is still visceral, raw and deep, but the truth is this abandonment has been building for a long time," Allen said, calling for Bay Staters to raise their expectations of institutions and each other.

Allen joins former state Sen. Ben Downing as the second Democrat to officially enter the race. If elected, she'd be the first Black woman to serve as governor of Massachusetts.

Republican Rep. James Kelcourse threw his hat into a different-sized ring on Wednesday, pulling papers to run for Amebsury mayor.

Amesbury City Hall is about a four-minute drive from South Hampton, New Hampshire, the type of border town that fellow North Shore Rep. Brad Hill had in mind when he pitched the Economic Development Committee on sports betting legislation by pointing to all the dollars leaving Massachusetts in the pockets of Granite State-bound gamblers.

"They're going right by our mom-and-pop stores, our restaurants, and they're staying in New Hampshire," Hill said.

Once again, the committee is weighing a host of bills that would impose various regulatory and taxation schemes on sports betting, and proponents used Thursday's hearing to make the case that revenue and jobs are passing Massachusetts by in favor of the 30 other states that have already made the wagers legal.

If it's not the sports betting but the tax-free shopping drawing you to plan a New Hampshire weekend, the Legislature might suggest you stick closer to home on August 14 and 15.

That's when the Senate and House agreed to schedule this year's sales tax holiday. While a 2018 state law made the tax-free weekend an annual fixture, it left it up to the Legislature to pick the exact dates each year, by June 15.

This just wasn't a good year for June 15 deadlines. The two branches did adopt a resolution setting the dates, but not until June 17. No consequences seem to have arisen from the two days' tardiness.

Saturday will mark the first observance of a new state holiday, and this one arrives without any additional legislative activity required beforehand.

Juneteenth celebrates the day in 1865 that enslaved African Americans in Texas received word they were free, more than two years after President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation.

Previously recognized in Massachusetts with an annual proclamation, Juneteenth became a state holiday thanks to a Rep. Bud Williams amendment in a COVID-19 spending bill signed last July.

After a whirlwind of activity in Washington, D.C. this week, it's now officially a federal holiday, too -- just in time to be observed on Friday.

President Biden signed the Juneteenth Independence Day Act, filed by Sen. Ed Markey, on Thursday, after votes in the U.S. House Wednesday and Senate Tuesday.

STORY OF THE WEEK: Four hundred and sixty-two days later, Massachusetts emerges from the COVID-19 state of emergency.


State House News Service
Friday, June 18, 2021
Advances - Week of June 20


This is the time of year when the first indication of a likely overdue annual budget comes in the form of an interim budget filed by the governor and quickly approved by the Legislature to give negotiators more time to hammer out a final spending bill. House and Senate Democrats can avoid that if they reach a budget deal in the coming days. Unlike last year, when concerns over a revenue freefall and uncertainty about federal aid caused budget writers to intentionally put their annual budgeting exercises on hold, lawmakers this year say they are trying to get back on their old schedule.

But even before the pandemic, House and Senate Democrats had trouble meeting their annual July 1 budget deadline. The challenges this year are significantly different than past years and center largely on settling policy differences and not overspending at a time when Massachusetts taxpayers are giving Beacon Hill far more in tax revenue than the architects of the pending $47.7 billion budget proposals envisioned.

When combined with record amounts of federal aid, it's a revenue glut spiraling into the billions of dollars, the likes of which the state has never seen before.

And there's also a logjam of budget bills building behind the big annual budget. The House last week sent the Senate a $257 million fiscal 2021 supplemental budget (H 3871) that makes mail-in and expanded early voting permanent and recommends a new composition for the MBTA Board, the current iteration of which expires on June 30.

In addition, after President Joe Biden and Democrats in Washington rammed through the massive American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) earlier this year to provide immediate and long-term economic supports, Republican Gov. Charlie Baker on Thursday offered the Legislature a $2.8 billion spending bill (H 3827) and urged them to act on it quickly to begin putting to work a big chunk of the $5.2 billion in direct ARPA aid received by the state.

House Speaker Ron Mariano previously mentioned June as a time to move on an ARPA spending bill, but Mariano and Senate President Karen Spilka in a statement on Thursday didn't commit to any timeline for action and emphasized instead their hope to continue attracting public feedback.

Storylines in Progress

... More mass vaccination sites are set to come down, with the Hynes Convention Center closing up its shots site on Tuesday and the site at the Natick Mall wrapping up on Wednesday ...

The Board of Education, controlled by Baker appointees, faces pressure ahead of a Tuesday vote to adopt additional changes to make access to vocational schools more equitable ...

Jamey Tesler next Friday hits his five-month anniversary as acting transportation secretary, and Beacon Hill still has not come up with a succession plan for the MBTA Fiscal and Management Control Board, which expires in less than two weeks ...

As the wait for a State House reopening timeline continues, the building remains one of the few in the state without some kind of plan and lawmakers continue to be advised to participate in sessions remotely. Six months into the session, House and Senate Democrats also remain in disagreement over public access to committee votes and virtual testimony. And the House also has yet to even adopt its own permanent rules for this session ...

The Transportation Committee takes testimony next week on the proposal to make undocumented immigrants eligible for standard Massachusetts driver's licenses ...

The Redistricting Committee will hear from people in the state's largest and western-most district next week, and the next move on a bill altering the way new districts are built belongs to the Senate ...

The battle over allowing debit card Lottery payments will be aired before a committee next week, although the full Senate has already adopted the measure as part of its fiscal 2022 budget ...

Wednesday, June 23, 2021

TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE - LICENSES FOR IMMIGRANTS: Legislation that would allow undocumented immigrants in Massachusetts to acquire standard driver's licenses is the only topic on the agenda at a virtual Transportation Committee hearing.

A similar version of the bill cleared the Transportation Committee by a 14-4 party line vote last session, before dying in the Senate Ways and Means Committee without action. The refiled bills (H 3456 / S 2289) have a total of 104 co-sponsors, representing a majority of the 200-member Legislature, but sponsors still have to convince legislative leaders to bring the bill to the floor for the votes needed to advance it.

Senate President Karen Spilka voiced her support for the licensing bill in 2019, and House Speaker Ronald Mariano said in March that he sees "value" in the proposal, though legislative leaders generally have been hesitant to advance major immigration-related proposals. Republican Gov. Charlie Baker opposes the bill, saying "the bar's pretty high on this one," so Democrats might need to line up a two-thirds majority to override any potential veto if they hope to advance the measure.

Supporters argue the bill would ensure undocumented immigrants are properly tested and licensed while driving and relieve them from concerns about deportation while traveling to work, school or medical appointments, while opponents contend it would reward undocumented immigration. (Wednesday, 2 p.m., More information)

Thursday, June 24, 2021

TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE: Joint Committee on Transportation holds a virtual hearing on 14 bills concerning aviation, privacy and gender identification.

Several bills on the agenda (H 3564, H 3597) propose new regulations on automatic license plate reader systems, seeking to limit the instances in which they can be deployed or how the data can be retained. A Sen. Julian Cyr proposal (S 2305) would require the Massachusetts Port Authority or airport commissions governing municipal- or county-owned airports to impose a "climate impact landing fee" of at least $1,000 on private, corporate-owned and charter rental aircraft -- but not commercial passenger or freight flights -- that arrive in Massachusetts.

Two other bills (H 3521 / S 2282) would enshrine in law a requirement that the Registry of Motor Vehicles allow those applying for driver's licenses or ID cards to select a nonbinary "X" as their gender instead of male or female. In November 2019, the RMV started allowing residents to choose a gender designation of X on their driver's licenses or state ID cards, making the change administratively after several sessions in which the Senate approved the change and the House did not. (Thursday, 2 p.m., More information)


NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml


Citizens for Limited Taxation    PO Box 1147    Marblehead, MA 01945    (781) 639-9709

BACK TO CLT HOMEPAGE