and the
Citizens Economic Research Foundation
Post Office Box 1147  ●  Marblehead, Massachusetts 01945  ●  (781) 990-1251
“Every Tax is a Pay Cut ... A Tax Cut is a Pay Raise”

44 years as “The Voice of Massachusetts Taxpayers”
and their Institutional Memory

Help save yourself join CLT today!


CLT introduction  and membership  application

What CLT saves you from the auto excise tax alone

Make a contribution to support CLT's work by clicking the button above

Ask your friends to join too

Visit CLT on Facebook

Barbara Anderson's Great Moments

Follow CLT on Twitter

CLT UPDATE
Tuesday, August 7, 2018

Watch closely very closely


On the heels of a tax windfall in fiscal 2018 that left Massachusetts with a surplus [more than $2 billion above FY2017; $1.1 billion more than "expectations"], fiscal year 2019 got off to a solid start for state tax collections in July.

The Department of Revenue said tax collections of $1.899 billion last month were up $102 million or 5.7 percent over July 2017 and came in $7 million above the monthly benchmark.

State House News Service
Monday, August 6, 2018
July tax collections up 5.7 percent over last year


When the state's highest court on June 18 knocked off the 2018 ballot a proposed surtax on the wealthy they also torpedoed a core element of the campaign platforms of the two Democrats running for governor this year, Jay Gonzalez and Robert Massie.

Now the candidates are floating alternative ways to raise revenue. Gonzalez, who does not plan to propose a specific tax plan until after he's elected, has mentioned a graduated income tax under which people in different income brackets pay different rates, or just raising the 5.1 percent income tax, or wiping out unspecified existing business tax breaks.

Massie told the News Service he favors higher registration fees on heavy vehicles, property transfer taxes, freeing up revenue by eliminating government waste, and revenues he anticipates Massachusetts could eventually secure by growing its renewable energy base and then exporting power.

The tax-and-spend plans of the two Democrats will contrast in the campaign with Gov. Charlie Baker's claim that he opposes new or higher taxes. While the governor has agreed to some taxes and assessments, he opposes raising broad-based taxes such as the income, sales or corporate taxes, and says he supports a reduction in the sales tax, although he has not proposed such a reduction. Baker, unlike his opponents, has also not outlined any re-election promises.

Gonzalez and Massie eyed the so-called millionaire's tax, and its projected $2 billion a year in new revenues, to pay for their education and transportation spending plans. The infusion of revenues could have also freed up other state revenues to accommodate other priorities and campaign spending promises....

Gonzalez . . . knocked Gov. Baker for supporting reductions in the income tax called for under existing laws.

State House News Service
Tuesday, August 7, 2018
Dem guv candidates eye tax options after income surtax fails


Ten races for open Massachusetts House seats are on track to be decided in the Sept. 4 primaries, when voters in a total of 45 House and Senate districts will have competitive contests on their ballots.

All 160 House and 40 Senate seats are up for election this year, and most lawmakers -- 23 senators and 87 representatives -- will cruise into another term without a challenger officially on the ballot. Twenty incumbents have primary opponents.

Of those, only four -- one senator and three representatives -- have challenges in both their party's primaries and in the Nov. 6 general election....

Ten new Democrats will be poised to join the House after the primary, with no Republicans on the ballot for those open seats.

State House News Service
Tuesday, August 7, 2018
Democrats set to seize ten open House seats


Chip Ford's CLT Commentary

Two Billion Dollars more than Fiscal Year 2017 poured into the state's coffers over the last fiscal year, which just ended in June, but still it's not enough.  There was a $1.1 Billion surplus from it after additional spending, which was also quickly spent.

The past month's revenue take ― July is the first month of the new (2019) fiscal year ― has jumped by $48 million, or 4.7 percent greater than last July's revenue take, but still that's not enough.

Now both Democrat candidates for governor want to raise taxes even more, more, always more. They still haven't recovered from losing that $2 Billion they expected and had already made plans to spend from their "millionaire's tax" graduated income tax scheme.  The state Supreme Judicial Court threw out that obnoxious ballot question as unconstitutional, but the long-lusted for spending plans remain dancing in their dreams.

Because More Is Never Enough (MINE) and never will be until the Beacon Hill pols take every cent we have from us.

It there somehow remains any question whatsoever in any pocket of the commonwealth over whether Massachusetts has a revenue problem or an insatiable spending addiction, the answer now is indisputably the latter.

"The infusion of revenues could have also freed up other state revenues to accommodate other priorities and campaign spending promises," the State House News Service reported.  That was our argument back then, that all revenue is fungible, easily moved from one state spending account to another depending on legislators' priorities, whims, and fancies.  You may recall the sponsors of the grad tax ballot question, their "Fair Share" constitutional amendment, at the time vehemently denied that would happen.  They promised it wouldn't.

But what are we to do when just about every legislator who wants to be re-elected to the best job they'll ever have is reseated pro forma in January, without opposition, serious or otherwise?

What should we expect when the new legislative session's new-old members are sworn in come January?  Remember, the first order of business the last time a new legislature was sworn in, after the last election (2016), the first thing they did was ram through an $18 Million obscene pay grab for themselves in record-setting time first exposed and battled every step of the way by Citizens for Limited Taxation!

Come January, I sure hope somebody is watching them closely very closely.  And prepared to fight back.

Chip Ford
Executive Director


 
State House News Service
Monday, August 6, 2018

July tax collections up 5.7 percent over last year
By Colin A. Young


On the heels of a tax windfall in fiscal 2018 that left Massachusetts with a surplus [more than $2 billion above FY2017; $1.1 billion more than "expectations"], fiscal year 2019 got off to a solid start for state tax collections in July.

The Department of Revenue said tax collections of $1.899 billion last month were up $102 million or 5.7 percent over July 2017 and came in $7 million above the monthly benchmark.

Income tax collections in July were $48 million, or 4.7 percent greater than last July but $3 million below the monthly benchmark. Sales and use tax collections came in $26 million ahead of last July and $1 million below benchmark. Corporate and business taxes were $13 million greater than July 2017 and $6 million above this year's benchmark.

"July revenues were close to benchmark," Commissioner Christopher Harding said in a statement. "As expected, there was solid growth over July 2017 in withholding and sales tax revenues. There are no major payments due in non-withholding income or corporate categories in July, so a modest dollar increase generated a large percentage increase against both benchmark and prior year actual. These should not be considered predictive of total FY19 performance."

DOR said July is "one of the smaller tax collection months" of the year and accounts for 6.7 percent of annual state tax revenue.
 

State House News Service
Tuesday, August 7, 2018

Dem guv candidates eye tax options after income surtax fails
By Michael P. Norton


When the state's highest court on June 18 knocked off the 2018 ballot a proposed surtax on the wealthy they also torpedoed a core element of the campaign platforms of the two Democrats running for governor this year, Jay Gonzalez and Robert Massie.

Now the candidates are floating alternative ways to raise revenue. Gonzalez, who does not plan to propose a specific tax plan until after he's elected, has mentioned a graduated income tax under which people in different income brackets pay different rates, or just raising the 5.1 percent income tax, or wiping out unspecified existing business tax breaks.

Massie told the News Service he favors higher registration fees on heavy vehicles, property transfer taxes, freeing up revenue by eliminating government waste, and revenues he anticipates Massachusetts could eventually secure by growing its renewable energy base and then exporting power.

The tax-and-spend plans of the two Democrats will contrast in the campaign with Gov. Charlie Baker's claim that he opposes new or higher taxes. While the governor has agreed to some taxes and assessments, he opposes raising broad-based taxes such as the income, sales or corporate taxes, and says he supports a reduction in the sales tax, although he has not proposed such a reduction. Baker, unlike his opponents, has also not outlined any re-election promises.

Gonzalez and Massie eyed the so-called millionaire's tax, and its projected $2 billion a year in new revenues, to pay for their education and transportation spending plans. The infusion of revenues could have also freed up other state revenues to accommodate other priorities and campaign spending promises.

Gonzalez reacted to the Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) by saying he would propose "another progressive way to generate meaningful revenue." Pressed more recently about specific ways he would raise revenue, Gonzalez responded by saying he would propose his new way to generate revenue in his first budget, but he did not offer specifics. If elected, he added, he would immediately direct the state Department of Revenue "to develop recommendations to accomplish the goal of generating new revenue from those in this state who are doing very well and who today pay the lowest percentage of their income in taxes."

"There will be a very clear choice for voters in this election: a choice between someone who is only there for the privileged and the powerful, and someone who will fight for all the 'little guys' out there; a choice between someone who is dragging Massachusetts backwards, and someone who will make Massachusetts a leader again," Gonzalez said in a statement, using some of the same language he used in his response three weeks earlier to the SJC ruling.

Gonzalez, who also supports a carbon pricing reform that some equate to a new tax, did not respond when asked to confirm there would be no concrete revenue plan until after he's elected, but it appears that will be the case.

During an appearance on WGBH last month, Gonzalez said a graduated income tax, which would require a constitutional amendment, would be the "best way" to come up with new revenue. He also mentioned increasing the income tax and increasing deductions and exemptions "so that it doesn't impact lower and middle income people," which would be similar to a tax plan put forward in his second term by Gonzalez's former boss Gov. Deval Patrick.

Gonzalez also said there are business tax breaks that the state is "giving away," estimating there are "billions of dollars that we're foregoing that we should be looking at." He knocked Gov. Baker for supporting reductions in the income tax called for under existing laws.

"You can't have a detailed proposal for how to do this where you understand what the consequences are in terms of revenues and impacts, in terms of which people are impacted, without the Department of Revenue doing that analysis," Gonzalez said during his interview with Boston Public Radio.

Gonzalez has a robust list of spending plans. He has vowed to give access to high quality, affordable child care and pre-school by the end of his first term to every child in the state under six years old. He supports switching to a single-payer health care system, citing "many inefficiencies and unnecessary complexities" in the existing system. He wants new revenue "to fix our broken MBTA system," repair roads and bridges, and invest in regional transit authorities, and he says the state needs to "seriously explore high-speed rail to Springfield, the North-South Rail Link and the Blue Line extension to Lynn."

In addition to expanding arts funding, Massie backs plans to electrify the transit system, provide free public higher education, ensure high quality care for infants and toddlers from birth to age three and provide free pre-school to all kids beginning at age 3, expand the MassHealth insurance program, and move aggressively toward a single payer health care system.

Massie, in addition to bashing "pro-business judges" appointed to the SJC by Baker, said it was now up to House Speaker Robert DeLeo and the rest of the Legislature to draft and pass a "progressive income tax amendment" for potential consideration by voters statewide in 2022.

While Gonzalez will use a trust-me approach to new taxes during the campaign, Massie is offering voters a glimpse of proposals he'll pursue, if elected.

Massie responded to a News Service inquiry about alternative revenue-raising plans with a 1,448-word essay that included some concrete revenue proposals.

In addition to restarting a four-year process to potentially bring a redrafted surtax on wealthy households to the 2022 ballot, Massie would also adjust transportation fees "so that different vehicles pay their fair share."

Massie says registration fees for higher gross weight vehicles should be raised since heavy weight trucks and bus owners "are essentially putting huge train-like vehicles on asphalt and they do huge damage to roads that require expensive repairs." Massie said, "Adjusting these fees would go a long way to closing the overall transportation funding gap. At the same time, we should lower registration fees for people who buy fuel-efficient and electric cars that both save money and our planet."

Property transfer taxes should be explored, "which would impose a small cost when properties owned by developers and owned by investors (not home owners!) change hands," Massie said. He referenced a proposal offered in his hometown of Somerville.

Saying taxpayer dollars are "going into a collection bucket with holes in it," Massie said eliminating waste would free up money to be spent on government services. He cited fraudulent State Police overtime payments and a "sham" Baker administration report outlining anticipated costs of an underground rail link between North Station and South Station in Boston. The report, Massie alleged, "was designed to prove that this important step would cost too much."

Massie also supports a movement toward more renewable energy that he says, at full buildout, would allow Massachusetts to export electricity, "thus generating as much as $6 billion a year in new tax revenue." He said, "We need to rein in our 'public' utilities who are costing us billions of dollars by preserving a broken business model that benefits their shareholders, but not us."

Gonzalez and Massie face each other in the Sept. 4 Democratic primary, with the winner facing the winner of the GOP primary between Baker and Scott Lively.

Lively supports a "complete and permanent elimination of property tax on homes" offset by a "graduated income property tax favoring reinvestment of earnings." According to his campaign, his other fiscal policy priorities include local control of tax collection, local control of spending on most government services and a "dramatic reduction" in state bureaucracies. Lively also supports a 10 percent budget reduction in every state agency, and an annual sales tax refund that his campaign says will return 50 percent of "downsizing savings" to taxpayers with the remainder used to pay down state debt.
 


State House News Service
Tuesday, August 7, 2018

Democrats set to seize ten open House seats
By Katie Lannan


Ten races for open Massachusetts House seats are on track to be decided in the Sept. 4 primaries, when voters in a total of 45 House and Senate districts will have competitive contests on their ballots.

All 160 House and 40 Senate seats are up for election this year, and most lawmakers -- 23 senators and 87 representatives -- will cruise into another term without a challenger officially on the ballot. Twenty incumbents have primary opponents.

Of those, only four -- one senator and three representatives -- have challenges in both their party's primaries and in the Nov. 6 general election.

Democrats Sen. Jason Lewis of Winchester, Rep. James Hawkins of Attleboro and Rep. Colleen Garry of Dracut, and Sandwich Republican Rep. Randy Hunt each have opponents from both parties looking to unseat them.

Hunt is the only Republican in either branch of the Legislature with a primary challenger, current Barnstable County Commissioner Ron Beaty.

Ten new Democrats will be poised to join the House after the primary, with no Republicans on the ballot for those open seats.

Contests for three now-vacant seats will be decided on Sept. 4 -- those last held by Sens. Nick Collins of South Boston and Brendan Crighton of Lynn and the late Rep. Peter Kocot of Northampton -- and voters will pick successors for outgoing Reps. Stephen Kulik of Worthington, Solomon Goldstein-Rose of Amherst, Cory Atkins of Concord, Jay Kaufman of Lexington, Frank Smizik of Brookline, Juana Matias of Lawrence and Evandro Carvalho of Boston.

Matias is one of 10 Democrats running for Congress in the Third District, and Carvalho is one of five running for Suffolk District Attorney.

Two seats opened up after this year's filing deadline, so the official ballots in those districts don't reflect the way races ultimately shaped up.

After the May 2 death of Rep. Chris Walsh of Framingham, the Framingham Democratic Committee opted against caucusing to nominate a candidate for his seat, leaving no names on the ballot and creating an opportunity for write-in campaigns.

In the Amherst-based Senate district last represented by former Sen. Stanley Rosenberg, several Democrats have launched write-in efforts. The only candidate whose name will appear on the ballot is Chelsea Kline of Northampton, who entered the race before Rosenberg resigned in May.

In four House districts with open seats, voters on both sides of the aisle will have competitive primaries. Those races are for the seats last held by the late Rep. James Miceli of Wilmington and former Rep. James Cantwell of Marshfield, and the seats Reps. Geoff Diehl of Whitman and Kevin Kuros of Uxbridge are giving up to run for different posts.

Diehl is one of three Republicans vying to unseat U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren.

Kuros will face off against Rep. Kate Campanale of Leicester in the Republican primary for Worcester County register of deeds.

In addition to the four incumbent lawmakers with both primary and general opponents, another 16 face just primary challenges.

The two senators in that group both hail from the western part of the state -- Sen. Adam Hinds, a first-term Democrat from Pittsfield, and Sen. James Welch, a West Springfield Democrat who co-chaired the conference committee that failed to reach a deal on health care legislation by the July 31 end of session.

On the House side, the list includes Assistant Majority Leader Byron Rushing of Boston and four of Speaker Robert DeLeo's committee chairs: House Ways and Means Chair Jeffrey Sanchez of Jamaica Plain; Public Health Committee Chair Kate Hogan of Stow; Public Service Committee Chair Jerald Parisella of Beverly, and Mental Health, Substance Use and Recovery Committee Chair Denise Garlick of Needham.

Other incumbent House Democrats in primary fights are: Reps. Robert Koczera of New Bedford, Jose Tosado of Springfield, Rady Mom of Lowell, Sean Garballey of Arlington, Marjorie Decker of Cambridge, Joseph McGonagle of Everett, Liz Malia of Jamaica Plain, Dan Cullinane of Dorchester and Angelo Scaccia of Readville.

Wednesday, Aug. 15 is the last day eligible voters can register with their local elections officials to be able to cast a ballot in the primary.

 

NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml


Citizens for Limited Taxation    PO Box 1147    Marblehead, MA 01945    (781) 990-1251

BACK TO CLT HOMEPAGE