Help save yourself
— join CLT
today! |
CLT introduction and membership application |
What CLT saves you from the auto excise tax alone |
Ask your friends to join too |
Visit CLT on Facebook |
CLT UPDATE
Thursday, December 5, 2013
Small Income Tax Cut Arrives
The Department of Revenue on Wednesday confirmed
that tax collections in November were sufficient enough to trigger a
reduction in the state income tax rate to 5.2 percent.
As the Boston Business Journal
first reported last month, state lawmakers and tax officials
have quietly been bracing for the rate reduction, which likely cost
the state between $60 million and $70 million in lost revenue in the
current fiscal year. The reduction from the rate’s current 5.25
percent level is scheduled to take effect Jan. 1.
The DOR’s lost-revenue estimate equates to around
0.2 percent of the state’s $34 billion budget for fiscal 2014. On an
annualized basis, the tax-rate cut would likely cost the state
around $130 million in lost revenue, based on DOR estimates.
Boston Business Journal Thursday, December 5, 2013
DOR confirms what BBJ readers already knew: Income tax rate to fall
Economic triggers have been met to force a
reduction in the state income tax in 2014 from 5.25 percent to 5.2
percent.
"We'll be reduced to 5.2 percent as of Jan. 1
2014," Administration and Finance Secretary Glen Shor told the News
Service....
Massachusetts voters in 2000 approved an
initiative petition calling to reduce the income tax rate from 5.95
percent to 5 percent by 2003. In 2002, in order to raise $215
million as part of a larger tax package, the state Legislature froze
the income tax rate at 5.3 percent and conditioned further
reductions on economic growth triggers.
State House News Service Wednesday, December 4, 2013
Income tax cut set of New Year
Barbara Anderson, executive director of
Citizens for Limited Taxation, which sponsored the 2000 ballot
question, said she still wants the 5 percent rate approved by 59
percent of voters.
But for the moment, Anderson said, the .05
percent cut would be a nice drop. "We'll happily take whatever we
can get right now," she said.
The income tax was 5.85 percent in 2000, when
voters passed the ballot question to gradually decrease it to 5
percent by 2003.
The Springfield Republican Wednesday, December 4, 2013
Tiny cut in Massachusetts income tax expected in new year
Barbara Anderson, executive director of
Citizens for Limited Taxation, which cosponsored the 2000 income
tax ballot question, pointed out that the rate would have fallen to
5 percent a decade ago, if legislators had not scuttled the law.
“We’re a little behind, but we’ll take whatever
we can get,” Anderson said Wednesday. “Pardon me if I don’t sound
pathetically grateful. They’re way behind. They owe us.”
The Boston Globe Thursday, December 5, 2013
State income tax rate will drop slightly on Jan. 1
Revenue Commissioner Amy Pitter today announced
that preliminary revenue collections for November totaled $1.572
billion, $151 million or 10.6 percent more than the state took in
last November. Strong performance in withholding collections and
higher gains in corporate and business tax payments driven by
one-time tax settlements and judgments offset lower than expected
estate tax collections to end the month $86 million above the
monthly benchmark based on the FY2014 revenue estimate of $22.797
billion.
In addition, the Department of Revenue certified
that revenue growth has met the final threshold needed to lower the
personal income tax rate from 5.25 percent to 5.20 percent beginning
January 1, 2014. As a result, revenue collections for the remainder
of the fiscal year will drop by an estimated $65 million.
Revenue collections for the first five months of
the fiscal year totaled $8.669 billion, $766 million or 9.7 percent
more than at this time last year and $359 million above the
year-to-date benchmark.
Massachusetts Department of Revenue Wednesday, December 4, 2013
November revenue collections total $1.572 billion Revenue collections meet final threshold to lower income tax rate
Seven campaigns have filed necessary
signatures with the state to put them one step closer to the
2014 ballot, including an initiative to expand the state's
bottle deposit law, a push to limit the number of patients a
nurse can care for at one time, and a move to increase the
minimum wage, as well as another for earned employee sick time.
The campaigns all turned in at least 68,911
certified signatures to Secretary of State William Galvin's
office, keeping them on track for the ballot. Once the
signatures are counted, Galvin's office will notify successful
petitioners, who then have until July 2 to collect another
11,485 signatures before qualifying for the ballot....
Other campaigns that continued along the path
include a group opposed to tying future gas tax increases to
inflation starting in 2015, which delivered 87,620 certified
signatures.
Opponents of linking the gas tax to the
consumer price index argue it is a "forever tax" and eliminates
the responsibility of elected lawmakers from voting on and
justifying tax increases. The question does not change the
3-cent gas tax increase passed by the Legislature, but removes
the link between the CPI and future tax increases.
Gov. Deval Patrick earlier this week
criticized opponents of the automatic gas tax increases.
"I think it was done in the right way, and I
think those that are advocating that the indexing be undone need
to answer for why it is they keep showing up for all the
ribbon-cuttings every time there's a new bridge or a new road
project done, but don't seem to want to participate in how to
pay for it," Patrick said Monday.
Rep. Geoff Diehl, a Republican from Whitman
who is one the question's backers, said the governor's comment
speaks to a "disrespect" for legislators' jobs "if he thinks all
we are interested in is going to ribbon cuttings." ...
Activists who wanted to roll the state's
sales tax back to 5 percent from 6.25 percent did not file
signatures by late Wednesday afternoon. The proposed question
had made it through earlier rounds. The petition was filed by
Owen George Becker, a Rowley resident, and its original signers
all live in Rowley, Wakefield and Peabody.
State House News Service Wednesday, December 4, 2013
Initiative petition campaigns keep on pace for 2014 ballot
|
Chip Ford's CLT
Commentary
We taxpayers have taken one more small step
toward rolling back the 1989 "temporary" state income tax hike to
its historic 5 percent, another five one-hundredths of one
percentage point closer. One more small step, but we'll take it!
Twenty-five years after we were promised by the
Legislature and then-Gov. Michael Dukakis that their tax hike would
be "only temporary," last for "only 18 months," and be used "only to
pay down the unexpected debt" (See "The
Promise" in their own words), their promise remains unkept,
proven false ― a lie 25-years ago.
Despite 59% of the voters demanding it be rolled
back to 5% on the 2000 ballot, The Big Lie continues because
democracy was thwarted, trashed on Bacon Hill.
So much for "settled law." And so much for being
reasonable.
A little history: Trying to be "reasonable" back in 2000,
we drafted the
income
tax rollback petition to phase in over three years
― so state government could adapt to
taking in less of our money, and, of course, so we'd have a better
chance to win on the ballot. The rate would automatically
decrease each year, from 5.95% as of 1999 to 5.6% in tax year 2001,
to 5.3% in 2002, back down to 5% in tax year 2003.
The Legislature got cute in 2000, before the election and our
question on the ballot. It dropped the rate to 5.85% hoping
that would win over voters, convince them to vote against our ballot
question. Nonetheless, we taxpayers didn't take the bait. Instead,
we won in November with 59% of the vote, so the Legislature got even
cuter two years later. In 2002, with the rate down to 5.3% as
the voters mandated, the Legislature "froze" it there
― where it remained until December of
2011, when it was
"unfrozen" for the first time, to 5.25% for tax year 2012.
It remained there last year, because the “triggers” were
missing.
The "triggering" of this five one-hundredths of one percent
decrease is only the second time since 2002 that the "temporary"
income tax rate hike has been reduced, a dozen years after it was
"frozen."
At
least the Department of Revenue tracks the formula each year.
The term "automatic" only works in one direction on Bacon Hill,
whether its pay raises for pols or gas tax hikes: More for
them from us. On Bacon Hill "automatic" is somehow a synonym
for "temporary" ― both go on
forever.
The Legislature's latest shot at automatic, the recently-adopted
automatic "forever" gas tax hikes, is about to be similarly tested
in November. The Tank The Automatic Gas Tax ballot committee turned
in 87,620 certified signatures to the Secretary of State on
Wednesday; comfortably more than the requisite 68,911. That was the
biggest hurdle. If the Legislature declines to adopt that initiative
(that'll never happen!) then another
20,000-30,000 signatures (from different voters) will need to
be collected before July 2 to put it on November's ballot. That's
eminently doable, which is why Gov. Patrick's shorts are in a knot
lately.
|
|
Chip Ford |
|
|
|
Boston Business Journal
Thursday, December 5, 2013
DOR confirms what BBJ readers already knew: Income tax rate to fall
By Craig Douglas
The Department of Revenue on Wednesday confirmed that tax
collections in November were sufficient enough to trigger a
reduction in the state income tax rate to 5.2 percent.
As the Boston Business Journal
first reported last month, state lawmakers and tax officials
have quietly been bracing for the rate reduction, which likely cost
the state between $60 million and $70 million in lost revenue in the
current fiscal year. The reduction from the rate’s current 5.25
percent level is scheduled to take effect Jan. 1.
The DOR’s lost-revenue estimate equates to around 0.2 percent of the
state’s $34 billion budget for fiscal 2014. On an annualized basis,
the tax-rate cut would likely cost the state around $130 million in
lost revenue, based on DOR estimates.
According to a state law passed in 2002, the state’s income tax rate
is set to automatically adjust down by 0.05 percentage points if
certain collections benchmarks are met. Those triggers will remain
in place until a minimum income-tax threshold of 5 percent is
reached.
DOR confirmed yesterday that all five of the law’s required revenue
benchmarks have been hit this year. To reach those milestones, the
state was required to reach or exceed tax-growth targets in fiscal
2013 as well as in each of the three-month periods that ended Aug.
31, Sept. 30, Oct. 31 and Nov. 30. State officials confirmed
Wednesday that each of those targets were met.
In fiscal 2013, tax revenue growth was 3.99 percent, well above the
law’s threshold requirement of 2.5 percent. Likewise, in each of the
three-month periods that ended Aug. 31, Sept. 30, Oct. 31 and Nov.
30, tax revenue outpaced the law’s required year-over-year growth
threshold of zero percent, according to DOR.
State House News Service
Wednesday, December 4, 2013
Income tax cut set of New Year
By Andy Metzger and Michael Norton
Economic triggers have been met to force a reduction in the state
income tax in 2014 from 5.25 percent to 5.2 percent.
"We'll be reduced to 5.2 percent as of Jan. 1 2014," Administration
and Finance Secretary Glen Shor told the News Service.
Asked about the tax cut's impact on the state budget, Shor said,
"There's lot of moving parts to the budget in any given year."
The Department of Revenue estimates the tax cut will reduce state
revenues by about $65 million in fiscal 2014. The tax cut will take
between $125 million and $140 million off the table for the fiscal
2015 budget, with Gov. Deval Patrick set to outline his fiscal 2015
spending plan next month.
Tax receipts are running $359 million above fiscal 2014 benchmark
through November. The Department of Revenue reported Wednesday that
November tax collections surged 10.6 percent, or $151 million above
collections in November 2012. Tax collections are up 9.7 percent
over the first five months of fiscal 2014, compared to the same
period in fiscal 2013.
Patrick administration officials this fall predicted non-tax revenue
in fiscal 2014 may fall short of estimates by $150 million.
Administration officials have repeatedly ignored request for the
reasons behind that revised forecast for non-tax revenue, and Shor
on Wednesday declined to specify reasons for the revision, offering
only the observation that there are many different non-tax revenue
sources.
Massachusetts voters in 2000 approved an initiative petition calling
to reduce the income tax rate from 5.95 percent to 5 percent by
2003. In 2002, in order to raise $215 million as part of a larger
tax package, the state Legislature froze the income tax rate at 5.3
percent and conditioned further reductions on economic growth
triggers.
Tax collections had been running above benchmark in early fiscal
2013, but fell just short of meeting the triggers for an income tax
reduction this past January.
Calls for increased state spending are beginning ahead of Patrick’s
budget filing.
UMass President Robert Caret on Wednesday called for a $40 million
increase in state funding for the university, saying a $519 million
appropriation would allow tuition and mandatory fees for in-state
undergraduate students to be frozen for a second straight year.
The Springfield Republican
Wednesday, December 4, 2013
Tiny cut in Massachusetts income tax expected in new year
By Dan Ring
People in Massachusetts are poised to receive a tiny cut in the
income tax on Jan. 1.
An official announcement could come on Wednesday, but judging from
comments by a spokeswoman for the state Department of Revenue, a top
member of the Massachusetts Senate, and a leading fiscal analyst,
the income tax is likely to drop from 5.25 percent to 5.2 percent.
It would be the second such cut in the income tax in three years.
The incremental cuts are triggered when growth in tax revenues
exceeds certain thresholds after adjusted for inflation.
In order for the cut to be assured, it needs to clear one more
threshold. The only hurdle remaining is for Gov. Deval Patrick's
revenue commissioner, Amy Pitter, to certify that inflation-adjusted
revenue growth was greater than zero for the past three months
compared to the same period of last year.
"I don't have the actual numbers, but I believe revenue collections
and inflation rates for the final growth period are positive enough
to meet the thresholds set forth in the legislation," Ann C.
Dufresne, communications director for the state Department of
Revenue, said in an e-mail.
"I am confirming that the numbers look like they will meet the final
threshold and that final certification may be announced tomorrow,"
she added by e-mail on Tuesday.
Back in 2000, voters had approved a ballot question to reduce the
income tax to 5 percent over three years.
But during a severe recession in 2002, legislators froze the tax at
5.3 percent and approved a law that included a schedule for the
income tax to gradually be lowered to 5 percent in increments of
0.05 percentage points. The law lowered the tax at a much more
gradual rate than the ballot question and linked the cuts to
improvements in state revenues.
For the fiscal year ending June 30, tax revenue rose by 3.99
percent, launching the process for the tax cut.
Dufresne said the cut would result in a reduction of $65 million in
state revenues for the final six months of the current fiscal year
and then $132 million for the full fiscal year starting July 1.
Sen. Stephen M. Brewer, a Barre Democrat and chairman of the Senate
Ways and Means Committee, said he would be "very, very surprised" if
the income tax failed to drop to 5.20 percent on Jan. 1.
"It looks like it is right in line for that reduction," Brewer said.
Brewer said he is "very OK" with the minuscule cut.
"The economy is showing that kind of improvement," Brewer said. "The
metrics sustain a reduction."
In the past, the revenue department has estimated that a .05 percent
cut would save $39 for a married couple filing jointly who own a
home, have two children less than 12 years old and $100,000 in
income.
The savings is only $9 for a single person with two children who
rents and makes $40,000.
A leader in human services cautioned that the cut could cause a drop
in state revenues that might affect services for the needy in the
state budget.
“Any significant drop in state revenues could not only harm the
one-in-ten vulnerable residents receiving supports, but it will
likely affect the low-paid direct care workers who provide essential
services," Michael Weekes, president and CEO of the Providers
Council, said in a prepared statement. "Currently, thousands of
human services workers – including many in Western Massachusetts –
were expecting a small salary adjustment before the holidays, but,
inexplicably, they’re now waiting indefinitely while the state has
reported a large revenue surplus."
Legislators and the governor approved $11.5 million one-time
payment, contingent on a budget surplus, for small raises for
workers of private, nonprofit agencies that contract with the state
for care of the mentally ill, the developmentally disabled and other
human services. The state, however, has not distributed the money or
announced a schedule for distribution, a spokesman for the Providers
Council said.
Michael J. Widmer, president of the Massachusetts Taxpayers
Foundation, said his organization is anticipating that the .05
percent cut in the income tax will take place on Jan. 1.
"It seems like a virtual certainty," Widmer said.
In a tight budget, the loss of about $140 million in state revenues
is meaningful, but manageable given the way state tax collections
are improving, Widmer added.
Barbara Anderson, executive director of Citizens for
Limited Taxation, which sponsored the 2000 ballot question, said
she still wants the 5 percent rate approved by 59 percent of voters.
But for the moment, Anderson said, the .05 percent cut would be a
nice drop. "We'll happily take whatever we can get right now," she
said.
The income tax was 5.85 percent in 2000, when voters passed the
ballot question to gradually decrease it to 5 percent by 2003.
The Boston Globe
Thursday, December 5, 2013
State income tax rate will drop slightly on Jan. 1
By Michael Levenson
Pennies from heaven?
More like a couple of bucks from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
When the ball drops and the champagne pops to celebrate the New
Year, the state will hand taxpayers a little gift: a tax cut worth
enough to buy a pizza or two.
State officials announced Wednesday that the income tax rate will
automatically fall to 5.2 percent from 5.25 percent on Jan. 1.
because the state collected more in taxes last year than it did this
year.
Most taxpayers can expect to save about $9 to $39 next year,
according to the state Department of Revenue.
Meanwhile, the tax cut will cost the state about $65 million in
revenue in 2014.
The tax cut was triggered by a 2002 state law that automatically
reduces the income tax rate when revenues grow according to a
formula, essentially guaranteeing minor tax cuts when the economy is
healthy. Legislators passed the law as a way to stop a more
aggressive tax cut that Massachusetts voters had approved at the
polls in 2000.
That voter-approved law would have slashed the then-5.85 percent
income tax rate to 5 percent by January 2003. Lawmakers argued the
impact on the state budget would have been severe at a time when the
state was grappling with a recession.
On Wednesday, Governor Deval Patrick, who wanted to increase the
income tax earlier this year, offered a mixed response when asked
about the automatic cut.
He lamented that the formula used to calculate the reduction did not
take into account that the state endured a historic drop in revenue
during the recession that began in 2008.
“The benchmark is a little off, but having the formula in place like
this is great,” he said. “We’re growing, and that’s good news.”
Barbara Anderson, executive director of Citizens for
Limited Taxation, which cosponsored the 2000 income tax ballot
question, pointed out that the rate would have fallen to 5 percent a
decade ago, if legislators had not scuttled the law.
“We’re a little behind, but we’ll take whatever we can get,”
Anderson said Wednesday. “Pardon me if I don’t sound pathetically
grateful. They’re way behind. They owe us.”
Others welcomed news of the tax cut, saying it would help families
pay for basics like coffee and T-shirts.
“I’m obviously thrilled,” said Representative Bradley H. Jones Jr.,
the Republican leader of the Massachusetts House. “Any time we can
let the taxpayers keep more of their money, it’s a good thing.”
Asked how he would spend his tax cut, Jones said, “covering this
recent increase at the gas pump.”
That was a reference to a 3 cent hike in the state gas tax that
Patrick and the Democratic Legislature approved this summer. That
law raised the gas tax from 21 cents to 24 cents per gallon and then
tied future increases to inflation.
The income tax cut on Jan. 1 will be the second such decrease
triggered by the 2002 law. In 2003, the rate fell from 5.3 percent
to 5.25 percent. Revenues came close to triggering another automatic
cut in 2013, only to fall slightly short at the end of the year.
Massachusetts Department of Revenue
Wednesday, December 4, 2013
November revenue collections total $1.572 billion
Revenue collections meet final threshold to lower income tax rate
Revenue Commissioner Amy Pitter today announced that preliminary
revenue collections for November totaled $1.572 billion, $151
million or 10.6 percent more than the state took in last November.
Strong performance in withholding collections and higher gains in
corporate and business tax payments driven by one-time tax
settlements and judgments offset lower than expected estate tax
collections to end the month $86 million above the monthly benchmark
based on the FY2014 revenue estimate of $22.797 billion.
In addition, the Department of Revenue certified that revenue growth
has met the final threshold needed to lower the personal income tax
rate from 5.25 percent to 5.20 percent beginning January 1, 2014. As
a result, revenue collections for the remainder of the fiscal year
will drop by an estimated $65 million.
Revenue collections for the first five months of the fiscal year
totaled $8.669 billion, $766 million or 9.7 percent more than at
this time last year and $359 million above the year-to-date
benchmark. One-time tax settlements and judgments exceeding $10
million accounted for $159 million of the year-to-date surplus which
must in general be deposited in the Commonwealth’s stabilization
fund.
“Above-benchmark performance in November was driven by strong
withholding collections. We will be examining December withholding
collections to determine if this trend is likely to be sustainable
or is instead at least partly due to timing dynamics ,” said
Commissioner Pitter.
Total income tax collections for November were $934 million, $98
million or 11.8 percent over last November and $74 million above the
monthly benchmark. Year-to- date income was $4.827 billion, $367
million or 8.2 percent over this time last year and $164 million
over the year-to-date benchmark.
November withholding collections totaled $905 million, $97 million
or 11.9 percent more than last November and $64 million above the
monthly benchmark. So far this fiscal year, withholding collections
are $4.143 billion, $253 million or 6.5 percent over last November
and $70 million over the year-to-date benchmark.
Estimated income tax payments brought in $18 million for the month,
$3 million or 18.5 percent more than last November and $2 million
over the monthly benchmark. Year-to- date estimated income tax
collections totaled $584 million, $62 million or 11.9 percent over
last year at this time and $44 million over the year-to-date
benchmark.
Income tax payments with returns or bills brought in $41 million for
the month, $3 million or 6.3 percent less than last November and $6
million above the November benchmark. Year-to-date income tax
payments with returns or bills totaled $308 million, $84 million or
37.4 percent over last year at this time and $83 million over the
year-to-date benchmark.
Corporate and business tax collections for November were $26
million, $17 million or 191.8 percent more than last November and
$17 million over the monthly benchmark. Year-to-date corporate and
business tax collections totaled $663 million, $149 million or 28.9
percent more than the same period last year and $127 million above
the year-to- date benchmark.
Sales and use tax collections for November totaled $438 million, up
$26 million or 6.3 percent from last November and $5 million above
the monthly benchmark. Collections through the first five months of
the fiscal year totaled $2.302 billion, $135 million or 6.2 percent
over the same period last year and $28 million over the year-to-date
benchmark.
State House News Service
Wednesday, December 4, 2013
Initiative petition campaigns keep on pace for 2014 ballot
By Colleen Quinn and Michael Norton
Seven campaigns have filed necessary signatures with the state to
put them one step closer to the 2014 ballot, including an initiative
to expand the state's bottle deposit law, a push to limit the number
of patients a nurse can care for at one time, and a move to increase
the minimum wage, as well as another for earned employee sick time.
The campaigns all turned in at least 68,911 certified signatures to
Secretary of State William Galvin's office, keeping them on track
for the ballot. Once the signatures are counted, Galvin's office
will notify successful petitioners, who then have until July 2 to
collect another 11,485 signatures before qualifying for the ballot.
A campaign to repeal the state's 2011 casino gambling law filed
close to 73,000 signatures, moving it along in the process. The
Supreme Judicial Court will now rule on whether the ballot question
is eligible. Attorney General Martha Coakley, who reviews all
proposed questions, did not certify it last September. Coakley
stated casino applicants had already invested in the licensing
process and have a reasonable expectation that it will play out.
Repeal supporters secured an injunction to start collecting
signatures. The SJC is expected to hear their argument early next
year, according David Guarino, a spokesman for the Repeal the Casino
Deal Effort.
Raise Up Massachusetts, a coalition of workers, unions, religious
organizations and community groups, submitted 111,758 certified
signatures for a initiative to raise the state's minimum wage to
$10.50 an hour. The group collected 96,970 signatures for another
question that would give workers the ability to earn paid sick time.
Nurses from the Massachusetts Nurses Associations delivered more
than 114,000 signatures for a question that would limit the number
of patients a nurse can care for at one time, and another 100,000
for a question that requires hospitals to be more transparent about
financial holdings and seeks to limit the compensation of chief
executive officers.
Wheeling the signatures on a gurney to Galvin's office Wednesday
morning, nurses said both questions will improve patient care.
"Most people do not realize that there is no law and there are no
standards in existence for the number of patients that can be
assigned to a nurse at one time," said Donna Kelly Williams,
president of the MNA.
Nurses have tried for years to convince the Legislature to pass
standards. Kelly Williams said they can't wait for lawmakers to act.
"That is why we have decided to take a different approach this
year," she said.
The second question from the nurses' aims to give the public more
knowledge about how hospitals spend money, in response to a
proliferation of hospital mergers, consolidations and the conversion
of non-profit hospitals into larger corporate networks, according to
Karen Higgins, a critical care nurse at Boston Medical Center who
delivered the signatures for the financial transparency question.
"The public has a right to know how and where their health care
dollars are being invested," Higgins said.
The proposed initiative has four key provisions. Hospitals which pay
their chief executive more than 100 times the annual compensation of
the lowest paid full-time employee would be fined. A new fund called
the Medicaid Reimbursement Enhancement Fund would be created, funded
by fines collected for "excessive" CEO pay.
Any hospital that receives money from the state, and whose patient
mix is less than 60 percent government payer, shall be subject to a
civil penalty for any annual operating margin that exceeds 8
percent.
Other campaigns that continued along the path include a group
opposed to tying future gas tax increases to inflation starting in
2015, which delivered 87,620 certified signatures.
Opponents of linking the gas tax to the consumer price index argue
it is a "forever tax" and eliminates the responsibility of elected
lawmakers from voting on and justifying tax increases. The question
does not change the 3-cent gas tax increase passed by the
Legislature, but removes the link between the CPI and future tax
increases.
Gov. Deval Patrick earlier this week criticized opponents of the
automatic gas tax increases.
"I think it was done in the right way, and I think those that are
advocating that the indexing be undone need to answer for why it is
they keep showing up for all the ribbon-cuttings every time there's
a new bridge or a new road project done, but don't seem to want to
participate in how to pay for it," Patrick said Monday.
Rep. Geoff Diehl, a Republican from Whitman who is one the
question's backers, said the governor's comment speaks to a
"disrespect" for legislators' jobs "if he thinks all we are
interested in is going to ribbon cuttings."
Supporters of expanding the nickel deposit on carbonated drinks to
water and juice containers filed approximately 105,000 signatures.
Activists looking to boost recycling argue the 30-year-old law is
outdated and does not reflect the explosion of water and sports
drinks. Opponents call it a tax, and are pushing for increased
curbside recycling.
Before dropping off boxes of certified signatures Tuesday,
proponents of a measure expanding the bottle deposit and redemption
law to more types of beverages rallied outside a government office
building.
Janet Domenitz, executive director of MassPIRG, said the Legislature
had set up the initiative petition process as a tool for those who
believe they are not represented on Beacon Hill.
"This is a sacred process," Domenitz said. "We're all honored to be
a part of it."
Phil Sego of the Massachusetts Sierra Club said playgrounds, parks
and rivers in Massachusetts were "choked with empty bottles and
cans" because non-deposit beverages are too often discarded.
Saying less than 25 percent of non-deposit containers are recycled,
Ken Pruitt of the Environmental League of Massachusetts called the
proposal a "pragmatic expansion of an existing law."
Rep. Denise Provost (D-Somerville) said plastic bottles, plastic
bags and plastic cups represent the "big three" threats to the
environment. "This is an untenable situation," she said. "Most
people realize that."
Cambridge Democrat Rep. David Rogers said the bottle law update
represented "good policy and good politics." He said, "Let's get it
on the ballot and get it done."
Asked after the rally about the odds of the proposal surfacing for a
vote in the House, where its supporters have been unable to get a
vote, Rogers said, "It's difficult to say."
Chris Flynn, president of the Massachusetts Food Association, has
been leading the opposition to the bottle law expansion and pushing
for expanded curbside recycling as an alternative.
"Lawmakers have rejected bottle bill expansion year after year for
good reason: it would cost voters and businesses more with little
environmental benefit," Flynn said in a statement. "Massachusetts
will do more for the environment by improving recycling through
comprehensive solutions such as expanding and improving curbside
pickup and making it easier to recycle on-the-go. Bottle bill
expansion would force consumers to pay an additional $60 million in
deposits on containers most of us already recycle - it's not about
the environment, it's simply a money grab."
Last September, Coakley certified 28 petitions, on 14 topics, and
denied five petitions. Typically, only a few of the petitions
certified by the AG make it all the way to the ballot. Should they
choose to, lawmakers early next year will have a crack at passing
alternatives to the ballot proposals.
Activists who wanted to roll the state's sales tax back to 5 percent
from 6.25 percent did not file signatures by late Wednesday
afternoon. The proposed question had made it through earlier rounds.
The petition was filed by Owen George Becker, a Rowley resident, and
its original signers all live in Rowley, Wakefield and Peabody.
Ballot campaigns last week turned in signatures to local officials
for certification. Galvin's office will now count the certified
signatures to make sure there are enough for petitions to move on.
There is a state constitutional requirement that no more than 17,228
signatures can be from any one county.
Once the signatures are counted, Galvin notifies successful
petitioners and submits the initiatives to the House of
Representatives by Jan. 2. Lawmakers have until May to act.
In the past few years, voters have passed ballot laws legalizing
medical marijuana, repealing a new tax on alcohol and outlawing dog
racing.
|
|
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this
material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes
only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Citizens for Limited Taxation ▪
PO Box 1147 ▪ Marblehead, MA 01945
▪ 508-915-3665
BACK TO CLT
HOMEPAGE
|