Help save yourself join CLT today!

CLT introduction  and membership  application

What CLT saves you from the auto excise tax alone


Ask your friends to join too

Visit CLT on Facebook

CLT UPDATE
Thursday, June 13, 2013

"Turning and turning in the widening gyre"


State Auditor Bump's report is more proof that the State House doesn't need to increase taxes. We need a Governor who will appropriately manage our tax dollars.

The Boston Herald
Wednesday, May 29, 2013
Tax hikes not needed
By Holly Robichaud


Reform-hungry lawmakers still riding momentum from this week’s blistering audit of the state welfare system are expected to roll into a hearing next week with a slew of bills aimed at the Department of Transitional Assistance, ensuring the fevered debate is far from cooling.

“I’m expecting it will be lively,” Rep. Shaunna O’Connell (R-Taunton), who’s pushing three bills with Rep. Russell Holmes (D-Boston), said with a laugh.

The Boston Herald
Saturday, June 1, 2013
Lawmakers working on reforms for DTA


It took an army of the dead to do it, but it seems the Massachusetts Legislature has awakened to the need for some meaningful changes in the state’s welfare system.

The dead are the 1,164 welfare recipients who a state audit found continued to receive public assistance long after departing this world. Or, we should say, “began to receive,” because in some cases the departed didn’t begin “collecting” until after they had gone to meet their maker. Payments continued for as long as two years or more after the beneficiaries’ demise....

The audit found other fraud indicators: $27 million in EBT benefits collected out of state or out of country in just six months, $15 million in suspicious EBT transactions that went uninvestigated, the disappearance of 30,000 EBT cards from one Department of Transitional Assistance office and much more.

All of this comes on top of earlier reports that the DTA failed to verify the eligibility of recipients who collected $25 million in benefits and did not know the whereabouts of another 19,000 recipients.

An Eagle-Tribune editorial
Sunday, June 2, 2013
Time to begin reforming welfare is now


State Auditor Suzanne Bump’s office, attacked by the Patrick administration over a controversial audit alleging welfare fraud, defended the report again yesterday, firing off a letter declaring confidence in its work.

“Although you have questioned the accuracy of our work, we believe that, after we meet ... you will agree that the results are sound and fully support the audit finding,” First Deputy Auditor Laura M. Marlin wrote yesterday to Health and Human Services Secretary John Polanowicz, who last week blasted some of the auditor’s findings as flat-out “false.” ...

“Your characterization that there is an ‘error rate’ with respect to those results is completely erroneous,” Marlin wrote.

The Boston Herald
Tuesday, June 4, 2013
Auditors insist welfare report’s accuracy spot on


Bombarded by stories of welfare fraud and abuse that range from dead people receiving benefits to $7,000 balances on EBT cards, lawmakers listened to reform proposals Tuesday while questioning costs and suggesting the Department of Transitional Assistance needs more time to implement its own reforms.

Rep. Shaunna O’Connell, a Taunton Republican who has pushed for welfare reforms, faced scrutiny from her fellow committee members on the Joint Committee on Children, Families and Persons with Disabilities about her proposals aimed at preventing ineligible people from getting public assistance.

O’Connell, who grew up in public housing with her parents, has been a vocal advocate for increasing identity verification as a condition of receiving public benefits. She said there are systemic problems in all of the state’s public assistance programs that invite fraud and abuse.

“We don’t have just an EBT problem here, it is really all of our public assistance programs” said O’Connell, who spent nearly an hour explaining and defending her proposals to the committee.

State House News Service
Tuesday, June 4, 2013
Lawmakers weigh welfare reforms ideas at public hearing


Republican state Rep. Shaunna O’Connell — stonewalled for months by the Patrick administration over her demand for a full accounting on welfare recipients with huge EBT card balances — is now being told to fork over $800 if she wants the public data.

“I have never heard of such a thing, as a legislator,” O’Connell (R-Taunton) told the Herald last night, vowing to pay the fee even as she slammed the Department of Transitional Assistance for stalling her.

“I think they owe this information, not just to me but to the taxpayers,” she said.

Shocked by a receipt showing one EBT user carrying a $7,000 balance, O’Connell in January first requested months worth of food stamp and cash benefit balances from the DTA....

O’Connell said last night she is exploring whether she can pay the fee with campaign funds or use her own money.

The Boston Herald
Wednesday, June 5, 2013
Rep. Shaunna O’Connell must pay to see bloated EBT accounts


Budget negotiators crowded around a table in House Ways and Means Chairman Brian Dempsey’s office on Thursday morning to start talks between the House and Senate on competing $34 billion budget proposals for fiscal year 2014 that starts in just three weeks.

The committee negotiating the annual budget is comprised of four Democrats and two Republicans, including Dempsey, Rep. Stephen Kulik, Rep. Viriato deMacedo, Senate Ways and Means Chairman Stephen Brewer, Sen. Jennifer Flanagan and Sen. Michael Knapik....

The budgets approved by both branches are dependent on new revenue from the transportation financing bill, and Gov. Deval Patrick is waiting to see the final product before issuing his verdict on the tax plan, which also has ramifications for local road and bridge repair funding....

Rep. Keiko Orrall, a Lakeville Republican, took the push for welfare reform to the airwaves Thursday morning, appearing on FOX25 to exhort the conference committee to eliminate the studies included in the House budget on the prospects for photo identification on EBT cards and Social Security number eligibility verification.

“These are simple types of reforms, real reforms, that we can put in place,” Orrall said.

While both Senate President Therese Murray and House Speaker Robert DeLeo have voiced support for photo ID on benefit cards, Murray has urged patience to wait for the Senate’s full reform legislation.

“Why? So we can drag the debate out? We don’t need to. We can do this right now,” Orrall later told the News Service. “I just want the system fixed because it’s a waste of taxpayer dollars.” ...

A surplus appears more likely for the fiscal year that ends June 30. Heading into the final month of fiscal 2013, tax collections are up 4.5 percent over fiscal 2012 and outpacing the year-to-date benchmark by $539 million. The size of any potential surplus will be affected by passage of any supplemental budget bill to address spending that state officials did not anticipate or did not budget for.

State House News Service
Thursday, June 6, 2013
Facing July 1 deadline, state budget talks start behind closed doors


State lawmakers crafting a final fiscal 2014 budget and Gov. Deval Patrick head into the final month of fiscal 2013 with tax collections up 4.5 percent over fiscal 2012 and outpacing the year-to-date benchmark by $539 million, which appears to increase the likelihood of a year-end surplus....

With the new fiscal year set to begin in three and a half weeks, a six-member House-Senate conference committee plans its first formal negotiating session on Thursday at the State House.

State House News Service
Thursday, June 6, 2013
Surplus looks more likely heading into last month of Fiscal 2013


Welfare reform crusader state Rep. Shaunna O’Connell delivered on her promise yesterday to fork over $800 for long-awaited records on bloated EBT balances, saying the pricey “ransom” was thanks to a surge of donations from fed-up constituents.

O’Connell wrote the check and marched down the hill from the State House to the Downtown Crossing offices of the Department of Transitional Assistance to personally deliver the fee.

“If DTA wants to hold these records hostage and make me pay ransom for them, then I’m going to pay the ransom for them,” she told the Herald as she embarked on her mission. “These should be public records. The public has a right to know.” ...

“We’re talking about taxpayers. They’re paying their taxes, they’re paying for fraud in this program, and now they’re helping to get these records,” O’Connell said. “I’m just going to pay this. I don’t want to drag it out anymore.”

The Boston Herald
Friday, June 7, 2013
Shaunna O’Connell pays info ‘ransom’
Big EBT balance list at stake


As Gov. Deval Patrick’s welfare “leakage” continues draining billions from the state budget, the Democrats find themselves reduced to ever more farfetched reasons for not coming to the aid of U.S. citizens who actually, you’ll pardon the expression, work.

Last week, it was in the alleged debate over a Republican measure to require Social Security numbers from public housing applicants.

As always, the liberals say it’s about “refugees,” not illegals. And there’s some court decision from 1977 — about 20 million illegal aliens ago. But the illegal-alien apologists always need new excuses, and this week’s welfare Alibi Ike is Rep. Tom Conroy (D-Wayland).

The Boston Herald
Monday, June 10, 2013
Putting a ‘fat finger’ on welfare’s woes
Moonbat of the week defends Social Security double standard

By Howie Carr


Where’s the tax package?

Like me, I’m sure you’re happy not having to fork over more money for Gov. Deval Patrick’s mismanagement … YET.

In the Democrats’ zeal to hike taxes on gas, cigarettes and utilities and create new taxes on software design businesses, early this spring they bypassed public hearings on the package. Hence, it is bewildering that the Legislature managed to bulldoze through the tax bill in both the House and Senate, but since then it has been stuck in conference committee.

Behind closed doors, just six of the 200 members of the Legislature are negotiating whether to accept the House bill that whacks us for $500 million or the Senate version that takes $805 million out of our wallets.

The 40-plus days of lingering is not a sign of hope that they have had a change of heart.

This is the People’s Republic of Massachusetts, where you ignore facts such as a revenue surplus of $549 million for this fiscal year.

The Boston Herald
Monday, June 10, 2013
We’re not out of the woods for a huge tax hike
By Holly Robichaud


We know how Gov. Deval Patrick feels about Rep. Shaunna O’Connell (R-Taunton) and her crusade against fraud in the state welfare system. Patrick has accused O’Connell of making “a lot of things up,” so it is no surprise that his team would throw up an expensive roadblock to her request for certain EBT records.

But O’Connell has called the administration’s bluff, writing a check for the $800 that the Department of Transitional Assistance said it would cost to compile records on high EBT account balances....

Secretary of State William Galvin’s office urges state agencies to waive fees for access to public records. When one of its critics came calling, the Patrick administration chose to ignore that advice. That’s not democracy. That’s payback.

A Boston Herald editorial
Monday, June 10, 2013
Petty on public records


The state’s top health official yesterday backed off the Patrick administration’s criticism of a scathing state audit of the scandal-wracked welfare department, saying his team is poring over the report’s findings after a “good meeting” with Auditor Suzanne Bump.

“I think we had questioned it initially,” Health and Human Services Secretary John Polanowicz said of the audit, which found taxpayer-funded benefits were being paid to more than 1,100 dead people. “And now that we have the benefit of the data and how they did their analysis ... we were happy she was able to give us the data so we can look at our systems.”

Gov. Deval Patrick brushed off Bump’s May 28 audit, telling the Herald that “99.9 percent” of welfare benefits are spent correctly, even as state officials challenged the report’s findings. Bump’s office fired back a letter, detailing the lapses found in the Department of Transitional Assistance and offering to meet with Polanowicz.

The Boston Herald
Wednesday, June 12, 2013
Official ‘happy’ to review welfare audit data


The state’s embattled Department of Transitional Assistance has removed the interim tag from Commissioner Stacey Monahan’s job title, formally naming her to head an agency that has come under heavy fire over its ability to root out fraud.

Monahan, who replaced Daniel Curley in February in the wake of a damning Inspector General report, officially takes over just weeks after state Auditor Suzanne Bump released a report blasting the department for doling out benefits to more than 1,100 dead people....

Monahan, the former chief of staff for the Executive Office of Health and Human Services, once served as executive director of the Massachusetts Democratic Party.

The Boston Herald
Tuesday, June 11, 2013
Monahan named new head of embattled DTA


The House Ways and Means committee will consider a series of new EBT-focused reforms in its forthcoming supplemental budget — just weeks after the release of a damning audit aimed at the state’s embattled welfare system, the Herald has learned....

The proposals, if cleared by the committee, would be part of the supplemental budget filed on Monday. They would mark the first action by House lawmakers since state Auditor Suzanne Bump released her May 28 review that found the state Department of Transitional Assistance had doled out millions in benefits to more than 1,100 dead people....

If filed by the committee, they then have to go before a vote by the full House.

The Boston Herald
Thursday, June 13, 2013
Proposed EBT reforms call for fingerprinting some recipients


Chip Ford's CLT Commentary

Who among us can keep up with what government and politics is doing to us today at such a frenzied speed?

Every day lately it's a new scandal exposed whether out of Washington D.C. from On High, or from Beacon Hill in parochial Boston. Government keeps racing at us, we the taxpayers, we the people, assaulting us from every direction like a swarm of wasps.

Lately, what Washington is doing to us scares me the most for it emboldens the lower politicians at more local levels.

I got literally dragged into political activism in 1985, when Massachusetts adopted it first mandatory seat belt law.  I still don't know why that issue broke this camel's back, but I could then feel this coming if we allowed the creep to insinuate itself into our collective subconscious, if we accepted it.  We the people defeated it on the 1986 ballot, but the Nannie State came back every year, year after year, and I kept fighting back.  Until 1994, when we activists put a newly-passed second mandatory seat belt law repeal back onto the ballot again, but that time the people adopted it.

During that early period of my nascent activism I learned to use a computer, began getting pretty good at it. In 1992 I authored "High Tech and the Age of Intrusion." My premonition of frightening things coming if we the people don't get control of our government was, in hindsight, prescient.  Today, between the IRS targeting political enemies, the U.S. Justice Department spying on the media, and the National Security Agency's data-mining of all our phone calls and Internet usage, I was ahead of my time and learning curve.

I always felt this was coming, knew I had to fight back every minute of the day with everything I had. It became my vocation, my cause in life. In 1996 I merged my organization (Freedom First) with Citizens for Limited Taxation and the battle continued and here we are, as anticipated so long ago, fighting for Liberty's life and ours in liberty.

Washington's over-arching power and the federal bureaucracy is imploding, or at least I hope it is. It's too early to tell, but more of we the people are aware of what's being done to us. How this will all turn out is over the horizon still.

Our immediate focus as CLT, where we can be most effective, is right here in Massachusetts. We Bay Staters have similar problems as in Washington just on a smaller, more local scale.

We've now got an unexpected state budget surplus of $539 million totally unanticipated but the Bacon Hill pols are intent on hiking taxes by over $500 million more anyway, so the state can spend even more . . .

Elected public officials simply ignoring politically inconvenient laws seems to be today's norm. They are empowered to continue this trend because none are prosecuted under the law nor ejected from public office by the voters.

What we're seeing in Washington has been trickling down to Massachusetts, on a smaller scale but clearly.

If you follow these updates then you know how hard State Rep. Shaunna O'Connell and a handful of others in the state Legislature have been fighting to expose the state's unrestrained welfare giveaways, to reform the system of government-imposed public charity at the expense of taxpayers. Yet at every turn these elected public servants are stymied, legally and not so much so, with simply getting information from Gov. Patrick and his administration. This latest indignity charging a sitting state representative $800 in order for her to attain information she needs to do the job for which she was elected is just over the top and cannot stand. At least it should not.

Even Secretary of State William Galvin a Democrat recommends state agencies to waive fees for access to public records, but his recommendations have been consummately ignored.

Barbara, Chip Faulkner, and I each have made a modest and personal contributions to Rep. O'Connell's campaign committee, to help fund the ridiculous Freedom of Information Act "charge" to her.

If a candidate for public office must spend down her or his campaign funds just to do their jobs, then we who provide all the money government extracts from us are doomed.  If these true reformers need spend too much of their privately-raised campaign funds just to effectively do their jobs, they won't have those funds to run a competitive campaign to be re-elected.  That solves Big-Government's problem, either way.

This is not even isolated. Just yesterday I received a second example of this oppressive trend. This is becoming the standard for anyone — even an elected representative who wants to dig into what government is doing to us, in our name!

Yesterday, State Rep. Marc Lombardo (R-Billerica) wrote:

"Earlier this week, you may have seen a report in the Boston Herald  [see Holly Robichaud's full Boston Herald column below, "We’re not out of the woods for a huge tax hike" Chip Ford]  that Representative Jim Lyons and I have discovered an abuse of taxpayer money in the Department of Public Health. Over $600,000 funded Project Party which according to the examiner was a program that recruited “gay men...to attend sex parties” that also had drugs, alcohol, crystal meth, cocaine, marijuana, and embalming fluid to be smoked. Reports also indicated sexual activity with minors.

"The administration has found a new way to raise revenue: charge Republican legislators who question the administration’s spending policies. As a result of requesting more information that should be open for the public, the Patrick Administration is forcing me to pay $508.00 to get information that the public deserves to have. Last week you may have seen that the administration charged Representative Shaunna O’Connell $800.00 for information on welfare fraud.

"The battle on Beacon Hill just got tougher. Not only do I need your financial support for reelection, but now I need your support to get information from a government that refuses to open up its books."

Recall the irony; it was the Patrick Administration that inadvertently opened this can-of-worms exposé, when it sent out a taxpayer-funded mailing to the state's 478,000 welfare recipients at a cost to taxpayers of $276,000.

The Boston Globe reported on Aug. 10, 2012 ("Only Mass. sent out voter registrations after lawsuit," by Stephanie Ebbert & Michael Levenson):

"Massachusetts is the only state that has agreed to send mass mailings to register welfare recipients to vote, following a series of state lawsuits brought by the liberal group Demos, which is chaired by the daughter of Democratic Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren."

That mailing even included a pre-stamped return envelope. The results, reported by the Boston Herald on Jan. 4, 2013, ("Welfare recipients ‘missing’ - State scrambles as voter mail exposes holes in system"), was initially that 19,000 of those living off taxpayers' sweat were missing-in-action, the mail was undeliverable as addressed.

And then came the truth, a month later, thanks to the Boston Herald (Feb. 1, 2013, "Welfare boss resigns in wake of $$ report"): The actual number was 47,087 households on welfare that are unaccounted for, fully ten percent of the statewide mailing.

That was the beginning of the lies, and they just keep being rolled out, so far with impunity. Now we're got that plus 1,164 dead EBT Card-holders who file for and receive benefits, yet still the Democrat majority won't admit there's a grave problem, never mind one that needs reform.

Pretty much everyone who votes cast their ballot in what they perceive to be their self-interests:  Either immediate interests, or long-range for their posterity.  Today fewer seem able to distinguish which is more important. It's getting to be a challenge:  Which will out-number the other?  Will it be us givers, or will it be the expanding takers and their short-term enablers? If the takers win, without us they and their patrons will quickly lose too.  We won't be here to fund their leisurely lifestyles anymore, be they government/taxpayer dependents or those elected by them.  [See Detroit]

It reminds me of something Barbara recently sent:


Turning and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.

William Butler Yeats (1865-1939), The Second Coming
 

All We the Responsible can do in the meantime is fight on even harder for as long as we can, and pray for victory in the end. We owe nothing less to those who came before and provided for us. We owe it to the next generation, whether they now appreciate it or not.

I don't know about you, but I'll be damned if I've sacrificed to fight a losing war all my life.

I expect you feel the same, or you wouldn't have read this far!

Chip Ford


 
 

The Boston Herald
Wednesday, May 29, 2013

Tax hikes not needed
By Holly Robichaud


State Auditor Bump's report is more proof that the State House doesn't need to increase taxes. We need a Governor who will appropriately manage our tax dollars.

Here is where your tax dollars are being wasted:

The latest report details roughly $100 million in fraud.

The Crime lab scandal is going to cost us a minimum of $332 million

In-state tuition breaks will cost $50 million

$275 million for illegal immigrants getting health care benefits

$30 million of mismanagement within the Department of Public Health

Right now, 6 members of the House and Senate are negotiating the tax package. If you are mad about the fraud within welfare, then please call the State House today to tell them not to raise our taxes. No more money!

The number is 617-722-2000.


The Boston Herald
Saturday, June 1, 2013

Lawmakers working on reforms for DTA
By Matt Stout


Reform-hungry lawmakers still riding momentum from this week’s blistering audit of the state welfare system are expected to roll into a hearing next week with a slew of bills aimed at the Department of Transitional Assistance, ensuring the fevered debate is far from cooling.

“I’m expecting it will be lively,” Rep. Shaunna O’Connell (R-Taunton), who’s pushing three bills with Rep. Russell Holmes (D-Boston), said with a laugh.

Tuesday’s hearing before the Joint Committee on Children, Families and Persons with Disabilities was set long before state Auditor Suzanne Bump’s report set the State House ablaze, detailing millions in public benefits going to the dead and out-of-state recipients.

But it’s expected to provide what O’Connell called a “timely” stage for debate, including for GOP members who alone have nine bills before the committee. They include calls requiring Social Security numbers to apply for benefits, drug-testing welfare applicants and cutting off recipients who fail to notify officials of address changes.

“I think given everything that’s transpired, a lot of good will and people’s ability to say, ‘Let’s give them a chance’ I think has dissipated,” House Minority Leader Bradley Jones said of DTA officials. “The status quo should be unacceptable to anybody.”

Committee co-chairman Sen. Michael Barrett (D-Lexington) is crafting a set of welfare proposals with Senate President Therese Murray, who this week said a promised bill will likely include House-backed measures to put photos on EBT cards and target loopholes in the state waiver program that allows additional benefits.

Some senators, including Jennifer Flanagan (D-Leominster), warned against acting too early without a more comprehensive bill, noting money would need to be put aside for some reform measures, including the much-debated EBT photos.

The audit, released Tuesday, has riled all corners of Beacon Hill, most notably the Patrick administration, which has gone on the attack, calling some findings outright “false” and demanding that Bump release all information on the 1,164 cases in which benefits went to dead people or those using a deceased person’s Social Security number.

A Bump spokesman said yesterday the office is working on a response.


The Eagle-Tribune
Sunday, June 2, 2013

An Eagle-Tribune editorial
Time to begin reforming welfare is now


It took an army of the dead to do it, but it seems the Massachusetts Legislature has awakened to the need for some meaningful changes in the state’s welfare system.

The dead are the 1,164 welfare recipients who a state audit found continued to receive public assistance long after departing this world. Or, we should say, “began to receive,” because in some cases the departed didn’t begin “collecting” until after they had gone to meet their maker. Payments continued for as long as two years or more after the beneficiaries’ demise.

The total cost of the “questionable public assistance benefits” to the deceased during the period examined by state Auditor Suzanne Bump’s team: $2.4 million.

In the typical case, the audit found, electronic benefit transfer (EBT) cards sent to the deceased were used by the living to purchase things or draw cash.

The audit found other fraud indicators: $27 million in EBT benefits collected out of state or out of country in just six months, $15 million in suspicious EBT transactions that went uninvestigated, the disappearance of 30,000 EBT cards from one Department of Transitional Assistance office and much more.

All of this comes on top of earlier reports that the DTA failed to verify the eligibility of recipients who collected $25 million in benefits and did not know the whereabouts of another 19,000 recipients.

Defenders of the welfare system, like Gov. Deval Patrick, claim to be outraged about any welfare fraud but at the same time claim it is insignificant and bristle at questions about what they are doing about it.

The short answer is nothing.

If Patrick remains in denial about welfare fraud, the Democratic leaders of the Legislature acknowledge there’s a big problem and propose to do something about it.

That includes requiring a photo ID on EBT cards to prevent people from collecting benefits they’re not entitled to.

Photo ID’s would make it harder for the heirs to cash in grandma’s EBT card. It would also make it harder for recipients to sell their EBT cards and for fraudsters to sign up for multiple cards.

“We’ve had a lot of discussions with law enforcement personnel who have told us about the multiple identities,” Senate President Therese Murray told the State House News Service. “When they arrest some people, they have multiple identities on them including multiple EBT cards and Social Security cards.”

House Speaker Robert DeLeo also backs photo ID. In fact, the House budget called for photo IDs with the start of the new fiscal year on July 1. The Senate killed that provision in its version of the budget. Murray said what was needed was a comprehensive reform plan.

DeLeo would still prefer to make a photo ID requirement part of the budget — and so would we — because it would guarantee quick action. A comprehensive reform bill might take months, or years, to pass.

Murray wants a package of reforms that would also include reducing the number of waivers exempting recipients from the welfare-to-work requirements enacted as part of reform legislation passed in 1995.

Murray would also put a stop to a scam that involved transferring custody of a child from a parent to a child to keep the welfare flowing, according to the State House News Service. And she would look into the habit some recipients are reported to have of moving to warmer climes in winter while still collecting.

Yes, the welfare system needs a thorough overhaul but there’s no reason to wait to implement the photo ID requirement, a simple and practical way to deter fraud.

Massachusetts citizens, like Americans in general, are generous people willing to come to the aid of those who need help. Just witness the outpouring of support, financial and otherwise, after the Boston Marathon bombing.

But their support evaporates when they suspect the system is being gamed or abused, as the welfare system clearly is. Their patience is growing short.

Those who want to preserve the welfare system for those who really need assistance need to fix it and now.


The Boston Herald
Tuesday, June 4, 2013

Auditors insist welfare report’s accuracy spot on
By Matt Stout


State Auditor Suzanne Bump’s office, attacked by the Patrick administration over a controversial audit alleging welfare fraud, defended the report again yesterday, firing off a letter declaring confidence in its work.

“Although you have questioned the accuracy of our work, we believe that, after we meet ... you will agree that the results are sound and fully support the audit finding,” First Deputy Auditor Laura M. Marlin wrote yesterday to Health and Human Services Secretary John Polanowicz, who last week blasted some of the auditor’s findings as flat-out “false.”

The three-page letter offered to walk welfare officials through the audit and provided a breakdown of how it found the state was sending public assistance benefits to 1,164 dead people — or others using dead people’s Social Security numbers — over a two-year period.

Marlin wrote that 79 percent of the cases pulled from Department of Transitional Assistance files fit the Social Security numbers, names and dates of birth of those in the Social Security Administration’s “Death Match File,” while more than 120 others matched in some combination of the first name, last name or D.O.B.

She also criticized Polanowicz’s assertion that problems his people identified in a separate set of 178 cases reflected badly on the data collected on the 1,164 dead. Patrick echoed the criticisms, telling reporters at the State House that “nine out of 10 of the examples we were offered are actually in fact not a problem.”

“We want to see all the data so we can understand the scope of her conclusions and the scope of the problem,” Patrick said. “If there is one.”

But Bump’s office has stood by the numbers.

“Your characterization that there is an ‘error rate’ with respect to those results is completely erroneous,” Marlin wrote.

HHS spokesman Alec Loftus said administration officials are looking forward to discussing the cases with the auditor and share in her “spirit of cooperation.”

“(We) hope this final review will enhance DTA’s efforts to protect taxpayer resources through the 100-day plan, and other initiatives,” Loftus said.

A top Democratic lawmaker said yesterday that, any dispute over numbers aside, the audit appears to have exposed real flaws in the embattled DTA.

“The auditor and the governor can quibble all they want about the numbers,” said Rep. David Linsky, chairman of the House Committee on Post Audit and Oversight. “But the public should be rightfully concerned about the accuracy and integrity of the work at the DTA.

“They shouldn’t rest on their laurels until no taxpayer money is wasted,” the Natick Democrat added. “I don’t think they can do that yet.”


State House News Service
Tuesday, June 4, 2013

Lawmakers weigh welfare reforms ideas at public hearing
By Colleen Quinn


Bombarded by stories of welfare fraud and abuse that range from dead people receiving benefits to $7,000 balances on EBT cards, lawmakers listened to reform proposals Tuesday while questioning costs and suggesting the Department of Transitional Assistance needs more time to implement its own reforms.

Rep. Shaunna O’Connell, a Taunton Republican who has pushed for welfare reforms, faced scrutiny from her fellow committee members on the Joint Committee on Children, Families and Persons with Disabilities about her proposals aimed at preventing ineligible people from getting public assistance.

O’Connell, who grew up in public housing with her parents, has been a vocal advocate for increasing identity verification as a condition of receiving public benefits. She said there are systemic problems in all of the state’s public assistance programs that invite fraud and abuse.

“We don’t have just an EBT problem here, it is really all of our public assistance programs” said O’Connell, who spent nearly an hour explaining and defending her proposals to the committee.

O’Connell filed legislation to phase in an online payment system for rent and utilities (H 132), as well as prevent EBT card purchases in states that do not border Massachusetts (H 133).

Some lawmakers on the committee argued DTA interim Commissioner Stacey Monahan is in the midst of implementing reforms as part the agency’s 100-day plan, and needs more time to see results.

Monahan, a former Democratic Party operative, was appointed five months ago after former DTA Commissioner Daniel Curley was asked to resign in the wake of an inspector general’s report that uncovered welfare waste and abuse.

Last week, State Auditor Suzanne Bump released an audit report that revealed more than 1,100 cases where dead people received welfare benefits or people using a deceased persons Social Security number. The Patrick administration has questioned the veracity of the audit, demanding more data from the auditor.

During the hearing, co-chair Rep. Kay Khan (D-Newton) said she fears O’Connell’s proposals are “all about directing DTA to do this, and DTA to do that,” in a time when there are not enough resources or staff within the agency to take on more responsibilities. The interim commissioner is taking steps to curb fraud, Khan said.

“We all want to clean up the fraud and abuse, there is no question about that,” Khan said.

Khan said she hopes lawmakers focus on proposals to help people get off welfare and escape poverty, while giving DTA time to implement the reforms it is already working on.

Rep. Daniel Gregoire (D-Marlborough) and Rep. Paul Heroux (D-Attleboro) both expressed hesitation about the reform proposals, saying they would be costly to implement.

O’Connell responded, “I would say it is not more costly than the fraud in the program.”

O’Connell argued DTA needs to stop people who are not qualified from getting benefits because it hurts people who truly need assistance.

Co-chair Sen. Michael Barrett said it appears there is a “meeting of the minds” between liberals and conservatives on better using technology to curb fraud. He said he appreciates the move to increase data matching, but worries it oversimplifies the process and understates the costs to implement the technology.

Barrett said he also wishes there was a way to verify reported fraud, like the example of one EBT card user hoarding $7,000 on his card, before those stories become “urban myth.”

“I don’t know if there is an EBT card with $7,000 or $7 on it,” Barrett said.

O’Connell said she has a picture of the receipt showing the $7,000 balance on it.

Committee member Rep. Jonathan Hecht (D-Watertown) said he is concerned the problem of out of state purchases is overstated and penalties proposed in the legislation seem extreme.

O’Connell said her proposal allows recipients to use their EBT benefits in bordering states, but people “who go to Florida for five months” should not be able to use Massachusetts benefits.

Other lawmakers with reform proposals met resistance.

Sen. Kathleen O’Connor Ives (D-Newburyport) proposed legislation to revive photos on EBT cards (S 61), an idea passed by House lawmakers as part of the fiscal year 2014 state budget. Opponents said there would be unintended consequences by requiring photo IDs like discouraging people from applying for benefits.

O’Connor Ives said she does not want to enact draconian measures that would hurt people who need help, but wants to find ways to stop fraudulent use to restore public confidence in the system.

Committee member Sen. Sonia Chang-Diaz (D-Boston) said she gets “hot under the collar” about abuse because it affects people in her district, and wants to cut down on it as much as other people. But she thinks people are making assumptions about what constitutes common sense reforms.

“Very few people in this building have actually experienced the day to day logistics of living in this level of poverty,” Chang-Diaz said.

Chang-Diaz said when she was a baby her mother was a food stamp recipient. It was not uncommon for her mom to ask her sister or aunt to go the store for her, using her benefits.

News of fraud has hurt families who genuinely need assistance, Diane Sullivan, a Medford mother told lawmakers.

“This is my card of shame now. Sadly, when I am in the store and I am using it, I look at who is looking at me,” she said, through tears.

She questioned what the photos would accomplish. She said she often sends her 9-year-old son and 12-year-old daughter to the store while she works, and wanted to know if her children would receive a card with their pictures on it.

Photo IDs will shame families and discourage those who need it from applying for benefits, she said.

Barrett said he thinks the photo ID idea has “legs” and political momentum within the Legislature, and asked opponents to detail concerns and factual complexities involved with putting photos on the cards.

“I think we have a real political, a real challenge there,” Barrett said.

Sen. James Eldridge (D-Acton) testified against the photo ID bill, pointing out the Romney administration abandoned the photo requirement on EBT cards because of high costs and low impact on fraud. DTA estimated the start-up costs range from $5 million to $7 million, and approximately $4 million every year after that, according to Eldridge.

Eldridge also testified on a bill (S 37) he filed that would adjust asset limits on welfare recipients, allowing them to accumulate up to $10,000 in a savings account while receiving public assistance. Eldridge said welfare recipients need to be able to save assets to buy a car, pay off debt, or pay for education, without being kicked off welfare rolls.


The Boston Herald
Wednesday, June 5, 2013

Rep. Shaunna O’Connell must pay to see bloated EBT accounts
By Matt Stout


Republican state Rep. Shaunna O’Connell — stonewalled for months by the Patrick administration over her demand for a full accounting on welfare recipients with huge EBT card balances — is now being told to fork over $800 if she wants the public data.

“I have never heard of such a thing, as a legislator,” O’Connell (R-Taunton) told the Herald last night, vowing to pay the fee even as she slammed the Department of Transitional Assistance for stalling her.

“I think they owe this information, not just to me but to the taxpayers,” she said.

Shocked by a receipt showing one EBT user carrying a $7,000 balance, O’Connell in January first requested months worth of food stamp and cash benefit balances from the DTA.

But after state officials repeatedly ignored her, she twice scaled back her request, including in an April letter asking for all balances from August, September and November 2012, and January through March of this year.

On the heels of a Herald report last week that the DTA still hadn’t responded, officials sent O’Connell a letter yesterday, saying it would process her request for $800. An estimate sent by the state’s EBT vendor said it would take 10 hours, at $80 an hour, to find and produce EBT cards showing large balances.

Evidence of bloated EBT balances raises new questions at the scandal-ravaged welfare department, among them: whether such recipients even need public assistance, and whether they are fraudulently holding more than one card.

The DTA came under fire last week after a scathing audit showed 1,160 dead people were receiving welfare payments.

Gov. Deval Patrick has sought to downplay the latest welfare flap, insisting to the Herald last week that the DTA program is 99.9 percent clean.

O’Connell said last night she is exploring whether she can pay the fee with campaign funds or use her own money.

A DTA spokesman issued a statement to the Herald yesterday, boasting about the agency’s 100-day initiatives to cut down on fraud without addressing questions about O’Connell’s request.

The GOP lawmaker’s tug of war with the Patrick administration came as legislators debated several welfare reform bills at a State House hearing yesterday.

At one point, state Sen. Michael Barrett, co-chairman of the committee considering the bills, cited the $7,000 EBT balance, saying he wanted more ways to verify reported fraud before it becomes “urban legend.”

“I don’t know if there is an EBT card with $7,000 or $7 on it,” Barrett said.

Said O’Connell afterward: “I assured him it was not mythical.”

Material from the State House News Service was used in this report.


State House News Service
Thursday, June 6, 2013

Facing July 1 deadline, state budget talks start behind closed doors
By Matt Murphy


Budget negotiators crowded around a table in House Ways and Means Chairman Brian Dempsey’s office on Thursday morning to start talks between the House and Senate on competing $34 billion budget proposals for fiscal year 2014 that starts in just three weeks.

The committee negotiating the annual budget is comprised of four Democrats and two Republicans, including Dempsey, Rep. Stephen Kulik, Rep. Viriato deMacedo, Senate Ways and Means Chairman Stephen Brewer, Sen. Jennifer Flanagan and Sen. Michael Knapik.

Though the budgets (H 3401 and S 1800) approved by both branches have near identical bottom lines, the spending and policy plans are full of differences minor and major, including levels of state support for higher education, early education and welfare system reforms adopted by the House but stripped by the Senate in anticipation of the filing of a comprehensive reform bill due at the end of the month.

The first action of the conference committee was to vote in favor of a motion made by Kulik to keep deliberations between the lawmakers private, as is typical for conference committees.

Before reporters were asked to leave, Senate Ways and Means Vice Chairwoman Flanagan joked that she appreciated the UMass Lowell paraphernalia in Dempsey’s office, prompting the Haverhill Democrat to joke, “Don’t let that influence you on your decision with higher education.”

The House included funding in its budget proposal to push state support for the University of Massachusetts up to 50 percent of its operating budget over two years, but the Senate did not include the funding increase university officials have said is necessary to avoid fee and tuition hikes in the fall.

Both Dempsey and Brewer are UMass graduates, with Dempsey graduating from Lowell and Brewer from the Amherst campus.

Brewer and Dempsey are also the lead negotiators for their branches on a $500 million new tax bill to finance transportation infrastructure and the MBTA. Both bills have dominated the discourse on Beacon Hill throughout the first five months of the year.

The budgets approved by both branches are dependent on new revenue from the transportation financing bill, and Gov. Deval Patrick is waiting to see the final product before issuing his verdict on the tax plan, which also has ramifications for local road and bridge repair funding.

“We’re making progress. We’re getting there,” Dempsey said of the tax conference negotiations.

The other negotiators on the tax bill (S 1770 and H 3415) conference committee are Sens. Thomas McGee (D-Lynn) and Robert Hedlund (R-Weymouth) and Reps. William Straus (D-Mattapoisett) and Steven Howitt (R-Seekonk).

Rep. Keiko Orrall, a Lakeville Republican, took the push for welfare reform to the airwaves Thursday morning, appearing on FOX25 to exhort the conference committee to eliminate the studies included in the House budget on the prospects for photo identification on EBT cards and Social Security number eligibility verification.

“These are simple types of reforms, real reforms, that we can put in place,” Orrall said.

While both Senate President Therese Murray and House Speaker Robert DeLeo have voiced support for photo ID on benefit cards, Murray has urged patience to wait for the Senate’s full reform legislation.

“Why? So we can drag the debate out? We don’t need to. We can do this right now,” Orrall later told the News Service. “I just want the system fixed because it’s a waste of taxpayer dollars.”

The conference committees’ final recommendations are not subject to amendment and the House and Senate will be asked to approve or reject the budget and tax bills as recommended.

Since Gov. Deval Patrick sought a $1.9 billion tax package and much larger investments in transportation and education, there’s a higher than usual level of uncertainty and intrigue this year over how he’ll treat the spending plan once it reaches him, with his power to influence outcomes in the spending and tax debates limited if House and Senate Democrats stick together in their support of the plans drafted by their colleagues.

A surplus appears more likely for the fiscal year that ends June 30. Heading into the final month of fiscal 2013, tax collections are up 4.5 percent over fiscal 2012 and outpacing the year-to-date benchmark by $539 million. The size of any potential surplus will be affected by passage of any supplemental budget bill to address spending that state officials did not anticipate or did not budget for.

Michael Norton contributed reporting


State House News Service
Thursday, June 6, 2013

Surplus looks more likely heading into last month of Fiscal 2013
By Michael Norton


State lawmakers crafting a final fiscal 2014 budget and Gov. Deval Patrick head into the final month of fiscal 2013 with tax collections up 4.5 percent over fiscal 2012 and outpacing the year-to-date benchmark by $539 million, which appears to increase the likelihood of a year-end surplus.

Department of Revenue officials reported Wednesday that May tax receipts finished $29 million above benchmark even though collections of $1.515 billion for the month were down $102 million or 6.3 percent compared to May 2012, when tax collectors received $200 million in one-time payments. The size of any potential surplus will be affected by passage of any supplemental budget bill to address spending that state officials did not anticipate or did not budget for.

“Despite the decline in one-time revenues which we anticipated in May, we remain above benchmark for the fiscal year largely because of investor reaction to federal fiscal policies implemented in January,” Revenue Commissioner Amy Pitter said in a statement. “This kind of behavior does not reflect normal economic activity that impacts future revenues.”

With the new fiscal year set to begin in three and a half weeks, a six-member House-Senate conference committee plans its first formal negotiating session on Thursday at the State House.


The Boston Herald
Friday, June 7, 2013

Shaunna O’Connell pays info ‘ransom’
Big EBT balance list at stake
By Matt Stout


Welfare reform crusader state Rep. Shaunna O’Connell delivered on her promise yesterday to fork over $800 for long-awaited records on bloated EBT balances, saying the pricey “ransom” was thanks to a surge of donations from fed-up constituents.

O’Connell wrote the check and marched down the hill from the State House to the Downtown Crossing offices of the Department of Transitional Assistance to personally deliver the fee.

“If DTA wants to hold these records hostage and make me pay ransom for them, then I’m going to pay the ransom for them,” she told the Herald as she embarked on her mission. “These should be public records. The public has a right to know.”

O’Connell is demanding electronic copies of all EBT balances over a six-month period this past fall and winter with balances above $1,500. She was told the records will be delivered within 10 days.

Gov. Deval Patrick has supported the $800 price tag for the records, with officials saying the money will be used to compile the data.

“We’re talking about taxpayers. They’re paying their taxes, they’re paying for fraud in this program, and now they’re helping to get these records,” O’Connell said. “I’m just going to pay this. I don’t want to drag it out anymore.”

O’Connell can use campaign funds for political expenditures as long as it [is] “not primarily personal” in nature, according to a spokesman for the Office of Campaign and Political Finance.

“Campaign funds can be used to pay for a records request if it enhances their political future,” said spokesman Jason Tait, adding he couldn’t directly comment on O’Connell’s case.

O’Connell said she launched her EBT project after a store owner in Pittsfield sent her a receipt showing a customer’s alarming $7,000 EBT balance.

“Somebody who accumulated that much money shouldn’t be on welfare,” she said. “That’s fraud.”

DTA spokesman Alec Loftus said in a statement yesterday: “We are glad that Representative O’Connell is paying for her request, so taxpayers don’t have to pick up the tab.”

The Taunton Republican’s do-it-yourself probe comes a week after state Auditor Suzanne M. Bump released a scathing report showing DTA paid about $2.4 million to 1,100 dead people — and doled out millions more to live recipients collecting EBT benefits from Florida and Las Vegas to the Virgin Islands.

Evidence of sky-high EBT balances could raise new questions at the scandal-ravaged welfare department, including whether such recipients even need public assistance and whether they are fraudulently holding more than one card.

The payoff came as a committee of lawmakers dove into closed-door meetings to hash out a 
$34 billion state budget, with House-passed welfare reforms looming large in the negotiations.


The Boston Herald
Monday, June 10, 2013

Putting a ‘fat finger’ on welfare’s woes
Moonbat of the week defends Social Security double standard
By Howie Carr


As Gov. Deval Patrick’s welfare “leakage” continues draining billions from the state budget, the Democrats find themselves reduced to ever more farfetched reasons for not coming to the aid of U.S. citizens who actually, you’ll pardon the expression, work.

Last week, it was in the alleged debate over a Republican measure to require Social Security numbers from public housing applicants.

As always, the liberals say it’s about “refugees,” not illegals. And there’s some court decision from 1977 — about 20 million illegal aliens ago. But the illegal-alien apologists always need new excuses, and this week’s welfare Alibi Ike is Rep. Tom Conroy (D-Wayland).

Conroy tried to run for the U.S. Senate last year, but couldn’t withstand fake Indian Elizabeth Warren’s juggernaut. This moonbat’s moonbat won’t be out-moonbatted again, and last week, he took to the floor of the House to oppose the GOP amendment.

The State House News Service reports Conroy first borrowed the governor’s latest lame rationalization — that the welfare system is 99 percent accurate “but it’s not perfect.”

Just ask Auntie Zeituni, right?

Conroy then discussed how to correct that pesky 1 percent error rate:

“You need to scrub the data and find out if it was fat fingers yielding bad data.”

The fat fingers defense! How can anyone applying for welfare be expected to have a Social Security number when the hack data processors have fat fingers and hit the wrong keys?

Fat fingers — why didn’t anyone think of that before?

“It takes a lot of resources, technology and outside consultants to write the algorithms to see if we can yield better matches,” Conroy continued, “It can take weeks or months.”

Rep. Conroy, are “fat fingers” the reason why all the dead people are getting EBT cards?

Someone call Auditor Bump, we may have unearthed a new clue in your fraud probe.

Can the “fat fingers” excuse be used in the Dreaded Private Sector? Will the IRS buy this — if you’re a Republican?

Rep. Randy Hunt (R-Sandwich), a CPA, was puzzled: “We do this at our business all the time by logging into the Social Security Administration. Are we not making this more complicated than it is?”

“Again, easy to do on a singular basis,” Conroy replied.

See, if you’re inputting only one Social Security number at a time, you can use a pencil or a pen to hit the right numbers on the keyboard. That way you don’t have to worry about your fat fingers. And if you think it’s tough dieting to get rid of those last 10 pounds, have you ever tried to drop a few ounces on your fingers?

Conroy added, “The folks receiving these benefits are sometimes challenged by no fault of their own to comply with all the requests we are making of them.”

Requests? Nobody asked them to get a job, or pay taxes. We don’t even ask them to learn English.

Look on the bright side. At least there aren’t any dead people “living” in public housing. Or are there?

Rep. Shaunna O’Connell (R-Taunton) spoke next: “I think it’s unacceptable to tell taxpayers we don’t have the ability to do these checks while we’re handing out benefits. This is a safety issue as well because you cannot do a CORI or sex-offender check if you don’t have a Social Security number. Florida is doing it, New Hampshire is doing it, Illinois is doing it. It can be done.”

Not here in Massachusetts. Our data processors have fat fingers.

The Republican amendment failed, by the way, 96-51. Because our legislators have fat heads.


The Boston Herald
Monday, June 10, 2013

We’re not out of the woods for a huge tax hike
By Holly Robichaud


Where’s the tax package?

Like me, I’m sure you’re happy not having to fork over more money for Gov. Deval Patrick’s mismanagement … YET.

In the Democrats’ zeal to hike taxes on gas, cigarettes and utilities and create new taxes on software design businesses, early this spring they bypassed public hearings on the package. Hence, it is bewildering that the Legislature managed to bulldoze through the tax bill in both the House and Senate, but since then it has been stuck in conference committee.

Behind closed doors, just six of the 200 members of the Legislature are negotiating whether to accept the House bill that whacks us for $500 million or the Senate version that takes $805 million out of our wallets.

The 40-plus days of lingering is not a sign of hope that they have had a change of heart.

This is the People’s Republic of Massachusetts, where you ignore facts such as a revenue surplus of $549 million for this fiscal year.

Bacon Hill is the place where taxes are raised before EBT reforms are enacted to save money.

It’s not as if taxes have not already been increased this year. Our napping governor forced Amazon.com to start collecting sales taxes.

Deval has even taken to filling the state’s coffers by holding public information hostage, and shaking legislators down for ransom. Representatives Jim Lyons (R-Andover) and Marc Lombardo (R-Billerica) are two of the victims being extorted $508.44 for their records request.

“Revenue is being increased by charging Republican legislators who question his administration’s spending policies,” said Lombardo.

These Republicans are trying to find out why the Department of Health spent $600,000 on the program called Project Party that studies sex parties. Wonder why the reluctance? I’m sure the taxpayers won’t “bitch and moan” about it, to quote Patrick’s own characterization of public questioning of official actions.

“The governor, who refuses to share information (about) how tax money is being spent, is forcing legislators to pay for data that should be available. So much for openness and transparency,” said Lyons.

Democrats already have been recorded on roll call votes in favor of the tax package once, so a second vote won’t be all that bothersome to them. Moreover, these tax-and-spend liberals already have spent the hike in the new budget. So the chances that they will not pass the increases are slim and none.

The most likely reason that we have been temporarily spared is due to an upcoming U.S. Senate special election. Dirty Ed Markey’s allies in the Legislature will wait until after June 25 in order to avoid angering taxpayers who would take out their frustration at the polls.

Holly Robichaud is a Republican strategist.


The Boston Herald
Monday, June 10, 2013

A Boston Herald editorial
Petty on public records


We know how Gov. Deval Patrick feels about Rep. Shaunna O’Connell (R-Taunton) and her crusade against fraud in the state welfare system. Patrick has accused O’Connell of making “a lot of things up,” so it is no surprise that his team would throw up an expensive roadblock to her request for certain EBT records.

But O’Connell has called the administration’s bluff, writing a check for the $800 that the Department of Transitional Assistance said it would cost to compile records on high EBT account balances.

Now, it’s true that O’Connell is on a bit of a fishing expedition.

But what if she were simply a curious, concerned citizen — without access to campaign funds to cover the bill and the attention of reporters to expose the outrage. Is it this administration’s practice to stonewall all such records requests — or to quote the taxpayers such outlandish fees for access?

In Massachusetts, a custodian of public records can charge no greater than the prorated hourly wage of the lowest-paid employee who is capable of performing the task. An estimate sent to O’Connell by the state’s EBT vendor said it would take 10 hours, at $80 an hour, to find and produce EBT cards showing large balances.

Set aside the absurdity of that estimate (how many people could it possibly take to produce a spreadsheet!). We’re deeply troubled when any public officials uses their control over public records — yes, *public records* — in an effort to thwart bad-news stories.

The Associated Press was initially quoted a fee of $1 million to cover its request for alternate government email addresses used by high-ranking officials at the U.S. Department of Labor, for example, before officials realized what they were doing was illegal.

Secretary of State William Galvin’s office urges state agencies to waive fees for access to public records. When one of its critics came calling, the Patrick administration chose to ignore that advice. That’s not democracy. That’s payback.


The Boston Herald
Wednesday, June 12, 2013

Official ‘happy’ to review welfare audit data
By Matt Stout


The state’s top health official yesterday backed off the Patrick administration’s criticism of a scathing state audit of the scandal-wracked welfare department, saying his team is poring over the report’s findings after a “good meeting” with Auditor Suzanne Bump.

“I think we had questioned it initially,” Health and Human Services Secretary John Polanowicz said of the audit, which found taxpayer-funded benefits were being paid to more than 1,100 dead people. “And now that we have the benefit of the data and how they did their analysis ... we were happy she was able to give us the data so we can look at our systems.”

Gov. Deval Patrick brushed off Bump’s May 28 audit, telling the Herald that “99.9 percent” of welfare benefits are spent correctly, even as state officials challenged the report’s findings. Bump’s office fired back a letter, detailing the lapses found in the Department of Transitional Assistance and offering to meet with Polanowicz.

Officials huddled last week, Bump spokesman Christopher Thompson said, and emerged with a “renewed commitment to cooperation.”

Also yesterday, Polanowicz promoted Stacey Monahan to DTA commissioner after she served four months as interim chief. Monahan won plaudits for creating a 100-day plan aimed at rooting out waste and fraud in the embattled agency. The plan came in the wake of an inspector general’s report that found $25 million in EBT money went to recipients who may not have been eligible. Saying Monahan has done a “good job” and gotten good reviews from lawmakers, Polanowicz decided to promote her even before her plan produced results.

“As you can imagine, sometimes it’s easier to do things with the title of commissioner than it is as acting,” Polanowicz said. “So I thought it was important to support her so she can continue the work.”


The Boston Herald
Tuesday, June 11, 2013

Monahan named new head of embattled DTA
By Matt Stout


The state’s embattled Department of Transitional Assistance has removed the interim tag from Commissioner Stacey Monahan’s job title, formally naming her to head an agency that has come under heavy fire over its ability to root out fraud.

Monahan, who replaced Daniel Curley in February in the wake of a damning Inspector General report, officially takes over just weeks after state Auditor Suzanne Bump released a report blasting the department for doling out benefits to more than 1,100 dead people.

Since heading the agency, Monahan has rolled out a 100-day plan officials say is targeted at better tracking welfare fraud, ordered a still-pending independent review of the department and embarked on a “listening tour” across 22 communities.

Several lawmakers have praised her work, including Senate President Therese Murray, who herself is crafting what’s promised to be a massive bill aimed at welfare reform. But some critics have said they still want to see results from her initiatives before buying into the changes.

Monahan, the former chief of staff for the Executive Office of Health and Human Services, once served as executive director of the Massachusetts Democratic Party.

The announcement came as Health and Human Secretary John Polanowicz named three other high-ranking appointments in his department.

Peter Forbes has been tapped to lead the Department of Youth Services, replacing Ed Dolan after he was named the state’s probation commissioner; Kathy Betts is the new assistant secretary for Children, Youth and Families; and Regina Marshall takes over as the department’s Deputy Assistant Secretary in the Office of Disability Policy and Programs.

Polanowicz, in a statement, called the group a “strong and experienced team.”


The Boston Herald
Thursday, June 13, 2013

Proposed EBT reforms call for fingerprinting some recipients
By Matt Stout


The House Ways and Means committee will consider a series of new EBT-focused reforms in its forthcoming supplemental budget — just weeks after the release of a damning audit aimed at the state’s embattled welfare system, the Herald has learned.

Among the proposals to be reviewed by the committee tomorrow:

• The installation of a fingerprinting comparison system to prevent duplicate benefits;

• Establishing a timeline to put photos on EBT cards;

• Prohibiting most recipients from using placeholders for Social Security numbers after three months;

• And requiring the assets and incomes of sponsors to be considered when weighing benefits for immigrants.

The proposals, if cleared by the committee, would be part of the supplemental budget filed on Monday. They would mark the first action by House lawmakers since state Auditor Suzanne Bump released her May 28 review that found the state Department of Transitional Assistance had doled out millions in benefits to more than 1,100 dead people.

The House had already passed some welfare reforms in its initial budget, including adding photos to EBT cards and creating a $300,000 Bureau of Program Integrity headed by an appointee of the Inspector General to oversee fraud detection practices in the DTA.

But the new proposals, in some cases, strengthen those reforms or add to them.

If filed by the committee, they then have to go before a vote by the full House.

 

NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml


Citizens for Limited Taxation    PO Box 1147    Marblehead, MA 01945    508-915-3665