CITIZENS   FOR  LIMITED  TAXATION
and the
Citizens Economic Research Foundation

CLT UPDATE
Wednesday, December 17, 2008

The more things change the more they remain the same



As Beacon Hill struggles to grasp its rapidly deepening budget shortfall, revealed Monday at over $2 billion since the start of the fiscal year, advocates are girding for a second round of resistance to likely additional midyear cuts to programs and further reductions to next year’s budget.

Some lawmakers balked at calls for new taxes beyond rapidly coalescing legislative support for an elevated gas tax, as the escalating fiscal crisis raises mounting cries for additional revenues, including human service advocates trying to build momentum for higher income and sales taxes....

State tax revenues for the current fiscal year will fall by as much as $749 million below levels that required a $1.4 billion budget fix two months ago, the Department of Revenue projected Monday. Receipts will continue to plummet, falling by 11 percent, or over $2 billion, between last fiscal year and the next one, according to a Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation estimate provided to Beacon Hill budget authors Monday....

Major tax increases were cornerstones of Beacon Hill efforts to rescue the state budget from red ink that spilled over during the recession earlier this decade and during the recession of the early 1990s. In 2002, over the objections of Republican Gov. Jane Swift, lawmakers raised the capital gains tax, froze the rollback of the income tax and scaled back income tax exemptions.

Veteran human services lobbyist Judy Meredith, who is organizing an umbrella group of progressive groups behind new revenues, estimated that adding a penny per dollar to the sales tax would generate $692 million and bumping the income tax by a percentage point would raise $2.15 billion. Meredith said the attention paid to the decay of physical infrastructure should extend to imperiled social structures like safety-net services.

“What I’m looking for, frankly, is someone to champion the notion of thoughtful comprehensive tax reform that raises new revenues,” Meredith said. “And we need a package of stuff that’s fair, that’s adequate, and that’s easy to administer.”

Of the income and sales taxes, Meredith said, “Those are the two broad-based taxes that we’re looking at, that people are beginning to whisper about ... It’s time to talk out loud about it.” ...

Meanwhile, human service advocates were busy Tuesday decrying the midyear cuts Patrick enacted in October....

Members of SEIU Local 509, which represents human service workers, joined the rally and suggested that state officials consider a “revenue package” to help offset the cuts....

As the budget morass deepens, inventive revenue measures are expected to receive support, and perennial proposals will likely enjoy rejuvenated attention.

State House News Service
Tuesday, December 16, 2008
Revenue declines put spotlight on new cuts, revenues


Gov. Deval Patrick’s top labor aide met with labor leaders Tuesday afternoon in the governor’s suite but declined to divulge the substance of the meeting. Secretary of Labor and Workforce Development Suzanne Bump, entering the governor’s office flanked by more than a dozen labor representatives, headed into the meeting in the Governor’s Council Chamber, where senior administration staffers, including chief of staff Doug Rubin and Undersecretary of Administration and Finance Jay Gonzalez awaited. Patrick appeared to be heading to the meeting as well, emerging from his inner office on a cell phone as visitors filed in.

State House News Service
Tuesday, December 16, 2008
State Capitol News Briefs
Patrick officials hold private labor meeting


Lieutenant Governor Timothy P. Murray said yesterday that the Patrick administration will not rule out cuts to local aid as part of its broad plan to close a deeper budget deficit than previously forecast....

"No final decisions have been made, but clearly, if you have to cut another $750 million, you have to look at everything," Murray told reporters at a State House press conference after being asked whether local aid would be cut.

The Boston Globe
Wednesday, December 17, 2008
Cuts in local aid to be considered,
Murray declares


State forecasters said yesterday that tax revenues will plunge by up to $750 million more, making it extremely likely that Governor Deval Patrick will be forced to cut state services again to balance the budget.

The new estimate, which comes just two months after the last revision, puts the total midyear shortfall as high as $2.1 billion, which is nearly 8 percent of the total state budget....

"The problem is so large, there's going to be a lot of damage," Michael Widmer, president of the Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation, said during testimony yesterday. "Damage to the economy. Damage to human beings. Damage to institutions."

The fiscal year 2009 state budget was initially built on estimates that $21.4 billion would come in. On Oct. 15, after national economic woes began hammering Massachusetts, top lawmakers and administration officials revised that figure to $20.3 billion. Yesterday was the first time state officials said the revenue estimate would go lower.

The Boston Globe
Tuesday, December 16, 2008
Forecast deepens fiscal gloom
State's shortfall put at over $2b this year


A whopping $648 million to $900 million dive in state revenues could put local aid for cities and towns on the chopping block as soon as next month, prompting massive cuts and layoffs, fiscal watchdogs warned today....

Fiscal watchdog Michael Widmer believes revenues will fall more steeply - some $900 million - below October estimates.

“To make a dent in the problem would be hard to do without going to local aid,” Widmer said. “I think the numbers are shocking, but the global economic calamity is taking everything in its wake.”

The Boston Herald
Tuesday, December 16, 2008
Revenue drop may spell doom for local aid


Chip Ford's CLT Commentary

Part of the State House News Service's report ("Revenue declines put spotlight on new cuts, revenues") yesterday noted:

"Major tax increases were cornerstones of Beacon Hill efforts to rescue the state budget from red ink that spilled over during the recession earlier this decade and during the recession of the early 1990s. In 2002, over the objections of Republican Gov. Jane Swift, lawmakers raised the capital gains tax, froze the rollback of the income tax and scaled back income tax exemptions."

Back in 2002, the Legislature imposed what the Boston Globe called "the largest tax increase in state history." State government needed this $1.14 billion tax hike to cover its just adopted FY 2003 state operating budget of $23.4 billion, another increase over the previous year's spending.

The Boston Globe reported on Jul. 23, 2002 ("Despite boast, budget has a bulge; Analysis sees rise in state spending"):

As legislative leaders passed the largest tax increase in state history recently, they tried to reassure voters that Beacon Hill was doing its own belt-tightening: At press conferences, they declared that state spending this year would actually decline from last year's spending, the first time in more than a decade that the budget would contract....

The real bottom line of the fiscal 2003 spending plan approved by the Legislature on Friday is about $23.4 billion, not the $22.9 billion quoted by House and Senate leaders, the [Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation's] analysis shows. And while the books for fiscal 2002, which ended June 30, won't be closed until October, the state Department of Revenue anticipates that total spending for the year will total $22.8 billion after unspent money is returned to the state, not the $23 billion legislative leaders have cited.

The Legislature created an off-budget account by moving $347 million in Medicaid expenses into a separate fund, the Health Care Quality Trust. Separately, lawmakers also moved $42 million off the budget that will cover a shortfall that has developed in the fund for hospital care for the uninsured, calling it a one-time expense.

That means that $390 million in expenses are essentially being hidden from taxpayers by "smoke and mirrors," said Senate minority leader Brian P. Lees, Republican of Longmeadow.

In my CLT Update commentary of Jul. 23, 2002 ("Bacon Hill adopts Enron accounting"), I wrote:

Today we learned from Boston Globe State House reporter Rick Klein that what Senate President Tom Birmingham described as a "scorched-earth" budget in fact again grows fatter than last year's budget by $600-$750 million. While that's a bit short from years of annual billion-dollar increases, even in the midst of their alleged "fiscal crisis" the spending continues growing.

Six years have passed since "the largest tax increase in state history" was imposed.  Six years have gone by since the voters' 2000 income tax rollback mandate was "frozen temporarily" as part of that $1.14 billion tax hike.

During those six years taxes have been increased (e.g. just this year: Cigarettes by $1/pack, an estimated $174 million in additional revenues, and; on businesses by $482 million under the guise of closing "loopholes").

During those six years the state's announced operating budget has gone from $22.9 billion in FY2003 to $28.2 billion for this fiscal year -- an increase of over $5 billion before recent and proposed emergency reductions by the governor have become unavoidable.

In Taxachusetts nothing ever changes but the seasons and pages on our calendars.  To keep up with these commentaries I need to only look back and recycle old news and predictions, lessons and experiences the Beacon Hill pols never learned a whit from.  "There is nothing new under the sun" in this misbegotten state.

Now the Gimme Lobby cabal -- emboldened by the voters' overwhelming rejection of Question 1, repeal of the state income tax -- is massing to push for more, more, more taxes.  They got the voters' cowardly message.  Yesterday the State House News Service reported:

Veteran human services lobbyist Judy Meredith, who is organizing an umbrella group of progressive groups behind new revenues, estimated that adding a penny per dollar to the sales tax would generate $692 million and bumping the income tax by a percentage point would raise $2.15 billion. Meredith said the attention paid to the decay of physical infrastructure should extend to imperiled social structures like safety-net services.

“What I’m looking for, frankly, is someone to champion the notion of thoughtful comprehensive tax reform that raises new revenues,” Meredith said. “And we need a package of stuff that’s fair, that’s adequate, and that’s easy to administer.”

Of the income and sales taxes, Meredith said, “Those are the two broad-based taxes that we’re looking at, that people are beginning to whisper about ... It’s time to talk out loud about it.”

One of the "tax reforms" we've heard this Gimme Lobby is considering is another shot at the Graduated Income Tax.  CLT has managed to defeat this "divide and conquer, one tax bracket at a time" obscenity on the ballot five times since it first reared its ugly head in 1975.   In Taxachusetts, the more things change the more they remain the same.

"Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it."  Bend over you foolish 70-percenters who voted "no" on Question 1:  They're coming to pick your pockets again, unless we the enlightened 30 percent can stop the tax-borrow-and-spenders and save the misguided and faint of heart from themselves once again, while we battle to save ourselves and what little remains of our commonwealth.

Chip Ford


State House News Service
Tuesday, December 16, 2008

Revenue declines put spotlight on new cuts, revenues
By Jim O’Sullivan and Kyle Cheney

As Beacon Hill struggles to grasp its rapidly deepening budget shortfall, revealed Monday at over $2 billion since the start of the fiscal year, advocates are girding for a second round of resistance to likely additional midyear cuts to programs and further reductions to next year’s budget.

Some lawmakers balked at calls for new taxes beyond rapidly coalescing legislative support for an elevated gas tax, as the escalating fiscal crisis raises mounting cries for additional revenues, including human service advocates trying to build momentum for higher income and sales taxes.

State tax revenues for the current fiscal year will fall by as much as $749 million below levels that required a $1.4 billion budget fix two months ago, the Department of Revenue projected Monday. Receipts will continue to plummet, falling by 11 percent, or over $2 billion, between last fiscal year and the next one, according to a Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation estimate provided to Beacon Hill budget authors Monday.

“This is serious, and we don’t know how long it’s going to last,” said Assistant Majority Whip Rep. Byron Rushing (D-South End), a proponent of an escalated gas tax. But, he said, “We have to be careful about raising other taxes. Our tax revenue is decreasing because of the economy.”

“I think the most important thing is to understand that we will not, even with additional taxes, be expending as much money,” Rushing said.

Major tax increases were cornerstones of Beacon Hill efforts to rescue the state budget from red ink that spilled over during the recession earlier this decade and during the recession of the early 1990s. In 2002, over the objections of Republican Gov. Jane Swift, lawmakers raised the capital gains tax, froze the rollback of the income tax and scaled back income tax exemptions.

Veteran human services lobbyist Judy Meredith, who is organizing an umbrella group of progressive groups behind new revenues, estimated that adding a penny per dollar to the sales tax would generate $692 million and bumping the income tax by a percentage point would raise $2.15 billion. Meredith said the attention paid to the decay of physical infrastructure should extend to imperiled social structures like safety-net services.

“What I’m looking for, frankly, is someone to champion the notion of thoughtful comprehensive tax reform that raises new revenues,” Meredith said. “And we need a package of stuff that’s fair, that’s adequate, and that’s easy to administer.”

Of the income and sales taxes, Meredith said, “Those are the two broad-based taxes that we’re looking at, that people are beginning to whisper about ... It’s time to talk out loud about it.”

Legislators taken aback by Monday's revelations said that members would likely still be hesitant to vote for tax increases. Veteran state budget-watchers are predicting the fiscal year that begins next July 1 to be the most harrowing in recent memory.

Rep. Vincent Pedone (D-Worcester), House chair of the Committee on Municipalities and Regional Government, said, "There definitely has to be a reduction in services, and revenues cannot be off the table, but we have to be responsible" in realizing that taxpayers hit by the recession will be reluctant to fork over more to the state.

"If we get to a point where we are unable to deliver core services because of a lack a revenue, then a lengthy discussion around how to find that revenue would be appropriate," Pedone said.

While increasing the 23.5-cent-per-gallon gas tax has enjoyed a groundswell of support, raising other broad-based taxes has found little public support in the Legislature.

"Whether the appetite's there remains to be seen," said Sen. Anthony Petruccelli (D-East Boston). "I think people are aware of the severity of the problem."

Gov. Deval Patrick spent most of the day in internal budget meetings, aides said. Senate President Therese Murray met with the heads of the state’s top business groups in her office. In a Boston Globe op-ed column, House Speaker Salvatore DiMasi said Patrick’s proposed $100 million toll increases were “not the place to start” for a comprehensive transportation reform that should include a consolidated super-agency, gas taxes, and potentially tolls at new locations like state borders or open-road tolling.

Meanwhile, human service advocates were busy Tuesday decrying the midyear cuts Patrick enacted in October.

“How the budget cuts stole Christmas,” read one of the many signs waved by mental health advocates Tuesday morning on the State House steps.

In their continuing campaign to restore services for the mentally disabled slashed by Patrick in the wake of deteriorating revenue collections, several dozen advocates – including one in a Grinch costume – paraded outside beneath gray skies.

Bill Allan, executive director of the Disability Policy Consortium, said the Patrick administration’s cuts undermined the philosophy of placing disabled patients in community care and would force some back into costlier institutions.

“I think it’s unconscionable,” said Allan.

Members of SEIU Local 509, which represents human service workers, joined the rally and suggested that state officials consider a “revenue package” to help offset the cuts.

Patrick has said the cuts were necessary to deal with a worsening fiscal crisis and that pain was spread through many areas of the budget.

Patrick came face to face with the victims of his budget cuts Tuesday in an impromptu encounter outside his third floor office. When 50 protesters marched on his office to demand the restoration of cuts to programs for the mentally ill, Patrick emerged from an elevator that opened right into the crowd. As he waded through to reach his office, protester Jessel-Paul Smith of the organization MPower pleaded with him to remember the poor.

“Just to refresh your memory and to make sure you’re fully cognizant, we are poor and the Bible says speak up for the poor and needy,” Smith said. “There are few people as poor and needy as those who are mentally ill.”

Patrick stood mostly silent, listening intently. When Smith finished speaking, the group behind him applauded loudly, and the governor said he understood their plight.

As the budget morass deepens, inventive revenue measures are expected to receive support, and perennial proposals will likely enjoy rejuvenated attention.

Rep. Sarah Peake (D-Provincetown) said she and Rep. Cleon Turner (D-East Dennis) plan to file legislation in January that would allow communities to opt in to an expanded room occupancy tax on short-term rentals. Taxing rentals at cottages, condos, and houses would help the town of Chatham alone raise $1 million, Peake said.

“Out in my area, where tourism is a major business, it would be a tremendous enhancement for my communities,” Peake said.


The Boston Globe
Wednesday, December 17, 2008

Cuts in local aid to be considered, Murray declares
By Matt Viser

Lieutenant Governor Timothy P. Murray said yesterday that the Patrick administration will not rule out cuts to local aid as part of its broad plan to close a deeper budget deficit than previously forecast.

Administration officials said Monday that tax revenues could plunge by up to $749 million, beyond the $1.4 billion budget gap that the state addressed in October.

"No final decisions have been made, but clearly, if you have to cut another $750 million, you have to look at everything," Murray told reporters at a State House press conference after being asked whether local aid would be cut.

He said the administration would try to preserve the funding, which cities and towns use to pay for programs, from teachers to trash collection, but after the first round of budget cuts just two months ago, "there's not a lot of other places to go."

Murray made the remarks after announcing that the administration was awarding $8 million to eight regional pilot programs around the state that are working to end homelessness.

Meanwhile, mental health advocates flooded the State House yesterday and confronted Governor Deval Patrick as he entered his office. Carrying signs such as "How the budget cuts stole Christmas," the group was protesting previous cuts to programs that serve those who are mentally ill.

Patrick listened intently, but offered no promises to restore the money or preserve remaining funding in the next round.

"Nobody is enjoying this," Patrick told the group. "This is not simple. It's not easy. It's not obvious what the choices should be. I see you. I see you. I'm not making decisions not knowing that it has a real-life impact on people's lives. I'm trying to find alternatives, I don't have them yet. . . . Whatever I do in one place has an effect someplace else, and you know that."

At a hearing this week, the Department of Revenue estimated that the state would take in $648 million to $749 million less than lawmakers had anticipated just two months ago, when the governor announced plans to close the $1.4 billion shortfall. That plan did not include cuts to local aid, but top state officials are not ruling out reducing what is a large funding source in many municipal budgets.

Other options could include raising the gasoline tax or tapping the $1.7 billion in the reserve account. State officials are also hoping that a stimulus package from the incoming Obama administration could help, although it is unclear what conditions the federal government would put on the spending and whether state officials could use the money to make up current budget shortfalls.

Local officials, who are already preparing for deep cuts to budgets next year, are holding out hope that the state will not reduce their current aid levels.

"Communities are struggling financially and have been struggling financially for some time now," said Geoffrey Beckwith, executive director of the Massachusetts Municipal Association. "They have been . . . looking at a terrible year next year in how the recession will impact the state."


The Boston Globe
Tuesday, December 16, 2008

Forecast deepens fiscal gloom
State's shortfall put at over $2b this year
By Matt Viser

State forecasters said yesterday that tax revenues will plunge by up to $750 million more, making it extremely likely that Governor Deval Patrick will be forced to cut state services again to balance the budget.

The new estimate, which comes just two months after the last revision, puts the total midyear shortfall as high as $2.1 billion, which is nearly 8 percent of the total state budget.

The projection, issued by the state Department of Revenue, will send state officials back for more private meetings on how to respond to the deteriorating situation, as the state confronts a growing unemployment rate and declining revenues in everything from the state lottery to capital gains taxes. Patrick is expected to develop a new plan to balance the budget as soon as next month, when the Legislature returns from a holiday break.

"We've got some big, big challenges ahead of us," Patrick told reporters yesterday outside his office. "We have a plan for several different contingencies, and we're looking at which of those plans to pursue come January."

Patrick declined to discuss those plans, saying, "I don't want to set off a panic."

Among options discussed yesterday during a four-hour revenue hearing were raising the state's gasoline tax, tapping the $1.7 billion in the reserve account, and making deep cuts in spending. State officials, who said Massachusetts probably entered a recession this summer, are also hoping a stimulus package from the incoming Obama administration could help alleviate some of the revenue problems.

Patrick closed a $1.4 billion budget gap in October without cutting local aid, but whether municipal leaders could escape a second round of cuts is unclear. House Speaker Salvatore F. DiMasi last week projected a local aid cut of up to 10 percent for next year's budget, but in light of the latest revenue forecast, a cut this year could also be in the cards. Administration officials would not rule anything out.

"The problem is so large, there's going to be a lot of damage," Michael Widmer, president of the Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation, said during testimony yesterday. "Damage to the economy. Damage to human beings. Damage to institutions."

The fiscal year 2009 state budget was initially built on estimates that $21.4 billion would come in. On Oct. 15, after national economic woes began hammering Massachusetts, top lawmakers and administration officials revised that figure to $20.3 billion. Yesterday was the first time state officials said the revenue estimate would go lower.

During an annual hearing yesterday to devise new revenue estimates, the Department of Revenue estimated that the state would take in $648 million to $749 million less than lawmakers had anticipated just two months ago. State officials are operating on two different tracks on the budget: trying to solve shortfalls for the current budget year, and creating revenue estimates to begin crafting the budget for fiscal year 2010.

"The figures today were very sobering," said Leslie Kirwan, the governor's top budget official. "We're going to have to work with our colleagues in the Legislature to decide how to react. I think everything will be on the table."

Nearly all revenues collected by the state are declining, but the biggest dropoff is expected in capital gains taxes. Because most of the stock market has plummeted in recent months, it is still difficult for state officials to determine how large that dropoff will be before taxpayers file estimated payments next month.

"I can't stress too much the uncertainty right now," said Alan Clayton-Matthews, an economics professor at the University of Massachusetts. "One thing is certain: Things are bad now, and getting worse quickly."

The national economy is pummeling state budgets nationwide. More than half of states have reported additional budget gaps, totaling $29.7 billion, according to a report released yesterday by the National Governors Association and the National Association of State Budget Officers.

State Treasurer Timothy Cahill offered a dismal picture of lottery revenues, which have traditionally been a sure bet to fill state and local coffers.

Overall lottery sales are down nearly 4 percent for the first five months of the current fiscal year, and the proceeds used by the state could come in $14 million to $30 million less than expected, Cahill said. The ice storm last week cut power to about 800 of the state's 2,000 lottery vendors, which resulted in a $2 million hit, Cahill said.

As an example of impacts, Cahill mentioned school construction. The Massachusetts School Building Authority is funded through state sales taxes, which are declining, and the agency may have to focus on renovating existing schools rather than building new ones, he said.

"It will get worse before it gets better; 2009 will be the most challenging and difficult year that we face," Cahill said.

The Department of Revenue also estimates that this year's unemployment rates - between 0.5 percent and 1.1 percent - will double next year. Navjeet Bal, the state's revenue commissioner, said Massachusetts entered a recession this summer, and it will last through the first half of next year.

Retail sales are projected to decline, as are corporate profits.

While the administration estimated the revenue shortfall this year could be $749 million, some outside budget observers put the figures even higher. The Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation estimated that tax collections would drop $900 million further this year. The business-funded watchdog group also estimated a further decline of $800 million for fiscal year 2010, which begins July 1, 2009. The Beacon Hill Institute pegged the additional losses this year at nearly $740 million, with an additional loss of $584 million next year.


The Boston Herald
Tuesday, December 16, 2008

Revenue drop may spell doom for local aid
By Hillary Chabot

A whopping $648 million to $900 million dive in state revenues could put local aid for cities and towns on the chopping block as soon as next month, prompting massive cuts and layoffs, fiscal watchdogs warned today.

Melrose Mayor Robert Donelan said he expected deep cuts to local aid given the plummeting economy, but urged state officials to act quickly.

“Every day they wait to make these cuts means they’re going to hurt twice as much,” said Donelan, who has spent much of the state cash already.

The state Department of Revenue projected a $648 million to $749 million drop in revenues from their last prediction in October, when Gov. Deval Patrick slashed $1.4 billion.

Fiscal watchdog Michael Widmer believes revenues will fall more steeply - some $900 million - below October estimates.

“To make a dent in the problem would be hard to do without going to local aid,” Widmer said. “I think the numbers are shocking, but the global economic calamity is taking everything in its wake.”

Administration budget officials met with lawmakers, lottery officials and financial experts at a revenue hearing today. While all agreed the sobering numbers would trigger close review in January, Patrick held off on saying additional cuts would be necessary.

“I don’t want to set off a panic,” Patrick said outside his office. “We’ve got some big, big challenges ahead of us. . . . We have a plan for several different contingencies, and we’re looking at which of those plans to pursue come January.”

House Ways and Means chairman Robert DeLeo said any additional cuts would probably mean a hit to local aid, and Senate Ways and Means chairman Steven Panagiotakos said additional cuts are likely.

Those at the hearing also looked at using more of the $1.7 billion rainy day budget, increasing the gas tax, and a potential windfall from a federal stimulus package from the incoming Obama administration.


NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml


CLT UPDATES