A PROMISE TO KEEP: 5%
A Ballot Committee of Citizens for Limited Taxation

 

Boston Herald
Saturday, April 17, 1999
A Boston Herald editorial

Yes, we do want tax cuts


Tax cuts? asks Tom Birmingham. What tax cuts? He says he hears no demands for tax cuts, but plenty of demands for government programs.

The governor's goal of a $1.4 billion income tax cut through a multiyear rollback of the rate to 5 percent, said the Massachusetts Senate president in restating his opposition to any major tax cut, is "fiscally the same" in an economic downturn as building that much spending into the budget.

What nonsense. There's a world of political difference.

Our lawmakers have shown over and over that they can and will raise taxes much more readily than they will ever cut spending.

House Speaker Tom Finneran, though he does not accept the proposition that raising the income tax rate to 5.95 percent was supposed to be temporary and does not support Gov. Paul Cellucci's complete rollback, fully realizes the virtues of tax cuts, not the least of which is forcing the state to be frugal. So he would cut the rate to 5.75 percent and leave open the possiblity of future reductions.

We're with the governor on this one, but between the speaker and the Senate president we line up behind Finneran. He knows whose money he's spending. Birmingham appears to think it belongs to the political establishment on Beacon Hill.


NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml