CITIZENS
for
Limited Taxation & Government
18 Tremont Street #608 Boston, Massachusetts
02108 (617) 248-0022
E-Mail: cltg@cltg.org Web-page: http://cltg.org
CLT&G
Update
Tuesday, July 28, 1998
Greetings activists and supporters:
"This is like 1987."
So concludes Leo Sarkissian, an "advocate for the mentally retarded," about the
new state budget that began on July 1. It increases spending on health and human services
programs by $314 million over last year, to nearly $8 billion.
I'm sure the teachers union concurs, as another $100
million of our promised tax rate rollback and our billion-dollar TAX OVER-PAYMENT
is about to be handed over as its reward for years of incompetence . . . and insuring that
the promise was broken and our cash was available to them.
This feeding frenzy surely is reminiscent of 1987
alright. But remember what followed "The Massachusetts Miracle" -- the
the Dukakis Fiscal Meltdown, and The Biggest Tax Increase in State History!
But did any of us really believe in Finneran's
"fiscal responsibility" or that the pols wouldn't find ways to spend our TAX
OVER-PAYMENT like drunken sailors out to sea for
far too long?
Chip Ford --
The Boston Globe
Tuesday, July 28, 1998
Leaders set broad plans for teachers;
State would be in forefront in hiring, training
By Kate Zernike, Globe Staff
In their first unified attempt at
addressing the state's teaching crisis, top legislative leaders and Acting Governor Paul
Cellucci joined the commissioner of education yesterday in proposing what would be the
nation's most comprehensive and rigorous program to attract, train, and retain top-notch
teachers.
Their plan envisions a series of
scholarships, incentives, and new programs from middle school to retirement, all aimed at
elevating a profession dragged down in recent decades by a lack of respect and low
starting salaries.
Standing at the foot of the grand
staircase of the State House, the leaders sought to change public sentiment by asking
people to recall those whom House Speaker Thomas M. Finneran called "gems" --
the teachers who have inspired achievement beyond expectation.
"This plan is about the dignity and
nobility of teaching," said Commissioner of Education David P. Driscoll. "We
need to return to a time when teaching was a very, very important aspect of our society.
... This issue is as important as there is for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts."
The plan plucks the most successful
programs from across the country andcombines them with proposals made in the weeks since
the state announced that 59 percent of prospective teachers did not pass a basic literacy
and skills test. It includes Senate President Thomas F. Birmingham's proposal to offer $20,000
signing bonuses and Cellucci's plan to test existing teachers and fire those
who fail.
While some states now include some of
the elements of what was proposed yesterday, no state includes them all.
Driscoll said the plan would cost
between $5 million and $10 million, a large part of that a onetime expense to set up the
endowment for signing bonuses. Finneran said the money would come from the $1 billion
state surplus.
Perhaps because it is so ambitious, the
plan ran into a wall of skepticism as soon as it was announced. But Finneran, Driscoll,
Cellucci, and Birmingham responded with almost belligerent optimism, insisting the
Legislature has the money and the will to spend it -- especially since education has shot
to the top of the public's list of concerns.
"In the last three weeks I think we
have observed a sea change in the decibel level of the rhetoric which has characterized
this debate ... away from recrimination, toward constructive proposals," Birmingham
said.
Still, there was some jockeying
yesterday as each hinted that his own aspect of the plan was most significant --
especially Cellucci, who is running for his first full term as governor. Yet while the
leaders admitted they might disagree as the details of the plan are worked out, they said
yesterday's announcement was significant because it brought them together to agree on the
need to do something.
The support of Finneran, Birmingham, and
Cellucci at the State House and Driscoll at the Board of Education is likely to improve
the plan's chances of becoming reality in some form.
"As one of several people who
expressed their immense frustration with what has become the fiasco of public education, I
am encouraged that out of the various sparks that were struck over the last three to six
weeks we now have a very public, collective desire and determination to move
forward," said Finneran, whose previous statements on the teacher testing debacle had
been limited to a speech in which he called the teachers who failed idiots -- a remark he
retracted as "impolitic" yesterday.
"They can count me in on the
conceptual parts, and I'll try to do my best to fill in the substantive framework."
Driscoll, the chief author of the plan,
said he would make specific proposals to the Board of Education on Sept. 15. Some parts
would require only board approval, while others would need the Legislature's vote. With
only this week left in the year's session, those elements requiring legislative approval
would be considered in January.
In the plan, there is something for
everyone to like, and something for every politician to take credit for.
The plan reaches as far back as middle
schools, to set up Future Teachers of America clubs, and in high schools it would offer
college scholarships to students who plan to go into teaching. In colleges, it would
expand a current program to forgive the student loans of top performers who go into
teaching.
It sets up what Birmingham called an
"elite" corps of new teachers attracted by $20,000 signing bonuses. By 2003, it
would establish a corps of 1,000 "master teachers" among the ranks of existing
teachers. These would train new teachers, who would be considered "apprentices."
The master teachers would be paid to
become certified by the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards, a
Detroit-based group that puts teachers through a yearlong series of hurdles to earn
special certification. Teachers who go through the program pay $2,000 and continue to
teach but also take a series of tests and are observed teaching during that year.
The plan also would make it easier for
those in mid-career in other professions to shift their talents to teaching without having
to take teacher education courses, a common deterrent to would-be educators.
For all teachers, it would toughen the
recertification procedure from what it is now. (In essence, teachers have to attend
courses to get recertified every five years, but do not have to sit through evaluations or
any tests.) A new procedure, Cellucci and Driscoll said, would include a test of how well
teachers know their subjects.
But even aside from the sheer difficulty
of steering such an expansive plan through the Legislature, there are other hurdles.
National board certification, for master
teachers, takes time and money. Only 911 teachers nationwide have completed the process in
the 11 years since the board was founded. Led by Republicans, Congress recently slashed
the national board's federal funding, complaining that it was taking too long to certify
too few.
And unions are resistant to teacher
testing.
"I didn't hear teacher bashing
today, which is an improvement," said Kathy Kelley, president of the Massachusetts
Federation of Teachers. "But ultimately, I think we're also going to have to do
something about salaries."
But to questions of how long the plan
would take to reach its goals, and how realistic it is, Driscoll retorted: "How long
is it going to take us in Massachusetts to commit ourselves to the nobility of
teaching?"
The Boston Globe
Tuesday, July 28, 1998
A BOSTON GLOBE EDITORIAL
Progress on teachers
Acting Governor Cellucci and the
legislative leadership took good measures yesterday, with union leaders looking on, to
depoliticize the next challenge in education reform -- recruiting, training, and rewarding
superior teachers. The atmosphere was downright genial compared to last month, when House
Speaker Thomas Finneran questioned the value of the teacher tenure system and denounced
would-be teachers who failed the state's first certification test as "idiots."
The vitriol has abated, leaving room for
legislation that provides a $100 million endowment to recruit
top college students into the profession via $20,000 signing bonuses. Funding would be
available from the state's final deficiency budget, according to Senate President Thomas
Birmingham, who authored the original proposal. The signing bonuses are sound policy and
deserve support, especially if combined with merit pay for current outstanding teachers.
The need to recruit a dramatically better class of teachers is obvious given the 59
percent failure rate of this year's aspirants.
The commitment to build a corps of 1,000
"master teachers" by 2003 suggests that more than election year strutting is at
work. Acting Commissioner of Education David Driscoll favors the rigorous program of the
nonprofit National Board for Professional Teaching Standards, which demands both intensive
subject expertise and the ability to make material come alive for students. Fewer than 10
teachers in the state have sought and received the blessings of the board. By turning to
this objective and uncompromising standard, state education officials would strip teachers
unions of the familiar complaint of administrative favoritism regarding promotions and
merit pay.
The latest initiatives, including
scholarships and loan forgiveness packages for highly ranked teacher hopefuls, should find
few detractors. The harder work will come when state education officials seek to establish
reliable performance evaluations for teachers. Success at the next stage won't be measured
in endowment funds but in willingness to discharge chronic underachievers.
State House News Service
Tuesday, July 28, 1998
HUMAN SERVICES GROUPS FINALLY GET A FRIENDLY STATE BUDGET
By Dan Boylan
STATE HOUSE, BOSTON, JULY 28, 1998 . . .
For the first time in the 1990s, spending for human services in Massachusetts is slated to
skyrocket in this year's state budget. From wage increases for those who care for the
needy to the reinstatement of benefits for mentally retarded citizens, advocates,
recipients and providers are excited that lawmakers are addressing long neglected issues
and curious about how long that support will last.
"This is like 1987," said Leo
Sarkissian, an advocate for the mentally retarded. "Back then, there were decent
allocations. This year we'll finally get some good funding, but it's only for this
year."
Sarkissian and other advocates say that
despite many positive developments, a focused look into the $19.55 billion budget acting
Gov. Paul Cellucci will sign this week reveals a reluctance on the part of legislators to
step fully up to the mantle of liberalism defined by the state's ambitious public
assistance programs of the 1980s.
Still, they say, the budget on acting
Gov. Paul Cellucci's desk is a firm step in the right direction. It increases
spending on health and human services programs by $314 million, to nearly $8 billion for
the fiscal year that began on July 1.
Many agree that Senate Ways and Means
Chairman Stanley Rosenberg (D-Amherst) and his boss, Senate President Thomas Birmingham
(D-Chelsea), whose budgets were more generous than those put forward by the House or
Cellucci, have stuck to their ideals and championed the causes of the less fortunate.
However, coaxing others into focusing on
social spending, despite a massive revenue surplus and budget that's swelled
by more than 6 percent from last year, remains as difficult as ever.
"How do you lobby this new generation of legislators who've grown up in a culture of
tax less, spend less?" asked one lobbyist. "It's a good question."
"We're a little bit concerned the
budget's being painted as 'human services friendly,' " said Greg Payne, Massachusetts
Coalition for the Homeless policy coordinator. "Many working families will still be
left out in the cold."
Payne applauded major funding hikes for
homeless assistance, including increases for food bank spending and emergency shelters.
But he did express disappointment that House Speaker Thomas Finneran (D-Mattapan) failed
to follow through on what Payne says is an easy issue -- adjusting the emergency
assistance shelter rules regarding income.
Payne said the Senate approved a measure
to raise the emergency assistance income guidelines to 130 percent of the federal poverty
line, which he explained would allow a parent of two to make up to $8.50 an hour at
full-time work and still stay in a shelter. As it stands now, a parent with two children
cannot earn more than $6.19 and hour at a full-time job or they'll lose their right to
free housing.
"Finneran seemed to support
this," Payne said. "Now, we'll have to continue to counsel families to quit
their jobs if they are in position of making to much money to be eligible for
shelter."
Sarkissian, the executive director for
ARC Massachusetts, said election-year politics and a fear of being identified with some of
the more liberal causes of the 1980s, has prompted many lawmakers to ignore or distance
themselves from certain issues.
Take the acting governor for example.
Sarkissian said Cellucci's somewhat awkward support of increases in spending for the
mentally retarded illustrates his point. "Cellucci, who has been behind us in
private, supporting mental retardation issues, has shied away about his support in the
public," he said. "He just wants to talk about tax cuts."
Sarkissian said he's pleased that the
fiscal 1999 budget sets out to provide the Department of Mental Retardation with an
increase of $10 million to trim roughly 400 individuals from a waiting list
of 3,100 who now receive no state benefits.
He also heralded an increase
of nearly $7 million for a program that serves 450 mentally retarded
citizens who this year will turn 22, the age when recipients traditionally lose state
benefits. "This is the biggest voluntary increase in MR spending in recent
history," he said. "You can call it liberal, or just responsive to what
government really stands for."
On the welfare front, the ultimate taboo
cause this decade, Massachusetts Human Services Coalition Director Sean Cahill said
lawmakers remain hesitant to tinker with any of the re-tooling they've applied to
transitional assistance earlier this decade.
Cahill said he was glad Rosenberg and
House Ways and Means Chairman Paul Haley (D-Weymouth) committed themselves to some welfare
issues, like addressing the legal immigrant food stamp shortfall for both 1998 and 1999.
But he lashed out at lawmakers for
failing to address what many are calling the major moral issue of the day -- the thousands
of welfare recipients who'll be forced off the rolls come this December if they have not
found jobs. "When the two-year time limit runs out and thousands will be cut
off," he said. Cahill said advocates are calling for exemptions.
Cahill said changing the exemption
statutes would cost the state little or no money, but as a moral issue, it would go
against anti-welfare sentiments that have prevailed in the 90s.
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17
U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who
have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and
educational purposes only.
Return to
Updates page
|