CITIZENS   FOR  LIMITED  TAXATION  &  GOVERNMENT
and the
Citizens Economic Research Foundation

 

CLT Update
Saturday, March 2, 2002

Mayors lay their money addiction on the Legislature


How did your state rep. and senator vote on taxpayer issues?
It's now available!

Check out the 2001 CLT ratings


The Massachusetts Mayors' Association voted yesterday morning to endorse a legislative agenda that includes a return to the 5.95 percent income tax rate that the state had for much of the 1990s.

Ottaway News Service
Feb. 28, 2002
Mayors push for income tax hike


As of the end of fiscal 1997, cities and towns that report to the department -- not all do -- said they had $397.9 million in free cash.

That was a record high, said Joseph Chessey, deputy commissioner of the Division of Local Services for the Revenue Department....

State officials announced in August that the state was sending out about $4.2 billion in local aid this fiscal year, an increase from about $2.5 billion in fiscal 1993.

Associated Press
Dec. 25, 1998
Cities and towns reporting high levels of free cash


Okay, so what did the mayors do with all of our money?

During the economic boom years of the '90s they were living fat and happy off our state income tax overpayment. Like the state Legislature, they got used to cash pouring in over the transom.

Now, at the first sign of an economic slowdown, they want to kill the voter-mandated "temporary" income tax rollback!

Shame on them.

Sure, it's easier to blame the Legislature, go hat in hand begging for more even at the expense of state taxpayers -- easier than standing up for a Proposition 2½ override for which they will beheld accountable.

But how dare they attempt to nullify the will of the voters, overturn the results of an election?

Just who or what do they think you are?

They've had more money than they knew what to do with. Like the Legislature, they squandered it, they grew government beyond what they can sustain. How dare they come looking to us now to give them even more?

Chip Ford


The Salem Evening News 
Thursday, February 28, 2002

Mayors push for income tax hike
By Jon Chesto
Ottaway News Service

BOSTON -- A coalition of Massachusetts mayors urged legislative leaders to support an income tax hike that would help the state fill a growing budget gap.

The Massachusetts Mayors' Association voted yesterday morning to endorse a legislative agenda that includes a return to the 5.95 percent income tax rate that the state had for much of the 1990s.

Many of the city leaders, including Beverly Mayor Thomas Crean and Lynn Mayor Chip Clancy, held a press conference yesterday afternoon at the Statehouse to announce their stance after meeting with House Speaker Tom Finneran and Senate President Tom Birmingham.

State legislators have been told to expect cuts in local aid that could be as high as 10 percent. The mayors fear those cuts will force cities to adopt higher real estate tax rates and cut services at a time when many cities are strapped for cash and making cuts.

The proposed income tax hike would represent a dramatic switch from the tax cut approved through a ballot initiative in 2000. The income tax, currently at 5.3 percent, is slated to drop to 5 percent next January because of the voter-approved rollback.

The mayors said reversing direction to 5.95 percent could raise as much as $1.2 billion for the state in the next fiscal year. They said the rollback could resume once the state's economy recovers.

The mayors said voters know the state's fiscal health has changed dramatically since they approved the rollback.

"Based on what's happening with the economy and the problems after Sept. 11, I would hope they would understand," Crean said. "We just don't feel, at this point, that it's fiscally responsible to give a tax cut."

Clancy, a former state senator, admits it could be tough to expect the Legislature to approve such a large tax increase, especially in an election year. Tax revenues, however, need to increase at the state level and not locally, he said.

Crean noted Beverly faces a tax hike during this fiscal year, and will likely experience budget cuts in the next fiscal year.

"As each day passes, the need to do something becomes more critical," Clancy said.

There is a significant amount of support in the House and the Senate to freeze the income tax at 5.3 percent, or possibly even return it to 5.6 percent. It's not clear, however, whether there's enough support to override a certain veto by acting Gov. Jane Swift, who has said the tax cut is important to the state's economy.

When Finneran met with reporters yesterday, he hinted that bringing back the 5.95 percent income tax rate might be too ambitious.

"I'm not sure that the members will rush to embrace that," Finneran said.

Still, Finneran and his leadership team continue to make it clear that tax increases should be on the table as possible ways to deal with the state's budget gap, which could easily exceed $2 billion for the fiscal year beginning on July 1.

Birmingham also seems to be open to an income tax increase, or at least a freeze at the current rate of 5.3 percent.

"A freeze in the scheduled income tax rollback is the minimum we must do to respond to the state's $2 to $3 billion deficit," Birmingham said in a prepared statement. "Gov. Swift's straitjacketed insistence on tax cuts threatens vital services. Our schools, police and fire departments are more important than her rigid ideology."

The mayors' unified stance drew criticism from anti-tax advocate Barbara Anderson.

"It's a cheap and easy request," said Anderson, a Marblehead resident and executive director of Citizens for Limited Taxation. "They've been slurping up local aid all through the '90s and apparently spending it as if there was no tomorrow. Now, they have to live within their means."


- A CLT BLAST FROM THE PAST -

Associated Press
Friday, December 25, 1998

Cities and towns reporting high levels of free cash
By Martin Finucane

BOSTON (AP) - With a booming economy and increased aid from the state, Massachusetts cities and towns are in better financial shape than they have been in years, local budget statistics suggest.

The strong finances are reflected in a record amount of "free cash" being reported by municipal governments to the state Revenue Department.

"The overall fiscal climate for cities and towns is sound. And that's good news," said Geoff Beckwith, executive director of the Massachusetts Municipal Association.

But Beckwith also said there continue to be "giant needs" locally for money to fix up everything from roads and bridges to town halls, libraries and sewer treatment plants.

As of the end of fiscal 1997, cities and towns that report to the department - not all do - said they had $397.9 million in free cash.

That was a record high, said Joseph Chessey, deputy commissioner of the Division of Local Services for the Revenue Department.

As recently as the end of fiscal 1992, when the state was just emerging from a recession, the cities and towns declared only $79.3 million in free cash. But that number has been rising ever since.

By the end of fiscal 1996, free cash had risen to $355.3 million.

Not all communities have reported yet for the end of fiscal 1998, but it looks as if fiscal 1998 figures will again show an increase, said Chessey, who served 10 years as mayor of Chicopee.

"Times are, I think, in the commonwealth, fantastic," Chessey said. "Just looking at the bottom lines we have here, free cash has gone up consistently over the last five years."

Chessey said communities can use their free cash as a reserve for unexpected expenses, citing his own experience as a mayor who was glad to be able to tap into $200,000 in free cash when a boiler blew up in a school building.

Chessey said that, as a rule of thumb, a financially healthy community should have 5 percent of its budget in free cash.

Cambridge City Manager Bob Healy reported having $32 million in free cash at the end of fiscal 1997. That number had dipped to about $10 million at the end of fiscal 1993.

He said there are always people who have good ideas for spending the surplus - and Cambridge has used some of its free cash recently for affordable housing and open-space acquisition.

There's a temptation to "be a hero and go out and blow all the dough," he said. But he also said: "Any good business always has a reserve and that's really what the free cash is. ... The good times we're in don't last forever."

Beckwith, whose organization represents cities and towns around the state, said the reasons for the rise in free cash included increases in state aid to local schools under the state's education reform law.

The state also has gradually been returning a greater share of revenues from the state lottery to cities and towns. A portion of the lottery revenues was funneled into the state's budget to help out during the state's fiscal crisis in the early 1990s.

State officials announced in August that the state was sending out about $4.2 billion in local aid this fiscal year, an increase from about $2.5 billion in fiscal 1993. Education aid alone accounted for much of the increase. It was up to about $2.6 billion this year from about $1.3 billion in fiscal 1993.

Beckwith said that, with Proposition 2½, the state's property-tax-limiting law, in place, it remains difficult for communities to invest in needed - but expensive - infrastructure projects.

But he said, "It's a much stronger platform than we were on seven or eight years ago."

Beckwith noted that the state's education reform plan, which mandated funding increases to make sure kids all over the state got an adequate education, runs out in the next budget year.

What happens next will be crucial to the 351 cities and towns, he said.

"We're heading towards a crossroads, and we just need to be able to anticipate that," he said. "We just need to be sure it's navigated without any collisions."

Return to top


NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml


Return to CLT Updates page

Return to CLT home page