CITIZENS   FOR  LIMITED  TAXATION  &  GOVERNMENT

 

CLT Update
Tuesday, October 23, 2001

Tax Rollback - Just an "option"?


Last year, voters overwhelmingly approved a gradual reduction of the state income tax to 5 percent.

Fortunately, Swift opposes postponing the tax cut, but the Legislature has contradicted the will of the voters in the past, as it did recently by inadequately funding the Clean Elections Law.

The Cape Cod Times
Editorial: Preserve the tax cut
Oct. 19, 2001


The steep decline is fueling calls to postpone by one year the second, $400 million phase of the state's new income tax cut. The $1.4 billion cut, approved by voters last year, lowers the income tax rate to 5 percent over three years.

"There's no active movement to do anything about it now, but it's one of the options on the table," said Charles Rasmussen, spokesman for House Speaker Thomas Finneran, D-Boston.

Associated Press
Oct 18, 2001


"It's one of the options on the table." Just last November our tax rollback won an overwhelming victory at the ballot box, but not even a year later it's brazenly declared an "option."

Was the tax increase, imposed for eleven years, an "option"? Are any laws passed by the Legislature simply "options"?

An option. That's a very short distance to a "solution" for a fiscal "crisis."

It's only in recent years that a citizen-initiated and voter-mandated law can be considered an "option" by the Beacon Hill Cabal. They seem energized by gutting with impunity the "Clean Elections Law" -- also overwhelmingly adopted by the voters.

When citizen-initiated laws are cavalierly shrugged off as mere "options," democracy is on the wane.

We must now be ever vigilant -- not an option for us. If we aren't, we too can find our victory at the polls stolen by the very crowd that vehemently opposed us throughout our years of advocacy, the same crowd which ultimately lost the battle of public opinion a mere year ago.

Chip Ford


The Cape Cod Times
Friday, October 19, 2001
Editorial

Preserve the tax cut:
With budget shortfall, Legislature should tap reserves, cut spending

With state revenues already $300 million behind last year, Acting Gov. Jane Swift is taking necessary steps to curtail state spending.

Officials blame the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks for aggravating an already slumping regional economy.

Several proposals are on the table to meet the state Constitution's requirement for a balanced budget.

One option is to use a portion of the state's $2.3 billion reserve account for any shortfall; another is to freeze state hiring and cut existing jobs.

Lawmakers are also likely to reduce spending plans for the fiscal 2002 budget by $200 million to $500 million.

Across the country, economic fallout from the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, as well as a general slowing of the economy, is starting to be reflected in state coffers, according to a Stateline.org survey of the 50 states.

The survey found 40 states reporting fiscal problems, ranging from mildly depressed revenues in Idaho to a severe budget deficit in Washington, Florida, California and elsewhere.

Swelling unemployment ranks, stock market losses and strengthened security and public health measures are straining limited resources. At least 15 states have made budget cuts or frozen spending since the attacks or have plans to do so soon.

All these measures and more must be taken before the Massachusetts Legislature even considers another option to balance the budget: postponing the second phase of the income tax rate reduction.

Last year, voters overwhelmingly approved a gradual reduction of the state income tax to 5 percent.

Fortunately, Swift opposes postponing the tax cut, but the Legislature has contradicted the will of the voters in the past, as it did recently by inadequately funding the Clean Elections Law.

The income tax reduction will put more money back in the pocket of consumers, which will be good for the economy. The tax cut must be preserved.


Associated Press
Thursday, October 18, 2001

Slump may delay tax cut

Layoffs, spending cuts and a delay in the state's income tax cut are some of the options being weighed as lawmakers struggle with an increasingly dismal fiscal future.

Acting Gov. Jane Swift said Wednesday she will impose a state government hiring freeze, end unnecessary out-of-state travel by state employees, and propose cuts in state programs.

"This is a good first step to start to constrain spending at the executive level," Swift said.

State revenues are already $300 million behind last year. Officials blame the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks for aggravating an already stumbling regional economy.

The steep decline is fueling calls to postpone by one year the second, $400 million phase of the state's new income tax cut. The $1.4 billion cut, approved by voters last year, lowers the income tax rate to 5 percent over three years.

"There's no active movement to do anything about it now, but it's one of the options on the table," said Charles Rasmussen, spokesman for House Speaker Thomas Finneran, D-Boston. "We're going to make cuts first, but nobody knows where this (decline) is going to end."

The Tax Equity Alliance for Massachusetts, which opposed the ballot question, is circulating a petition calling for a one-year delay.

Michael Widmer, president of the business-backed watchdog group the Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation, said the state should only consider delaying the tax cut after it has made spending cuts and used a portion of its "rainy day" reserve account.

"If there is still a shortfall, we need to put everything on the table," including the tax cut, he said.

Swift rejected any change to the tax cut, which she championed.

"My opinion is the tax cut will help our economy recover more strongly and more prosperously in the future," Swift said.

The hiring freeze, which Swift can do by executive order, will not affect plans to hire and train 150 new State Police troopers. But some other state workers are likely to lose their jobs.

"Unfortunately, layoffs will have to be on the table to get the level of reductions that the fiscal picture is going to demand," Swift said.

Lawmakers are currently locked in negotiations about how to chop between $200 million and $500 million from their original spending plans for the fiscal year that began July 1.

Swift plans to meet with Finneran and Senate President Thomas Birmingham soon to develop a bipartisan strategy to deal with the expected shortfall.

The state Constitution requires a balanced budget.

Swift also could propose using some of the state's $2.3 billion cash reserves. Widmer said the state should spend no more than a third of its reserves in a single year.

Swift also could urge the Legislature to spend more of the money the in its settlement with the big tobacco companies, aides said.


NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml


Return to CLT Updates page

Return to CLT home page