An Essay by Chip Ford
Submitted (and ignored) as an op-ed rebuttal
to the Boston Globe's editorial of April 11, 2003
"We certainly applaud those individuals whose
compassion has led them to volunteer extra tax payments," the
Boston Globe opined yesterday in its editorial, "A
collective duty," marginalizing our voluntary tax check-off.
"But we do not recommend it."
The Boston Globe's preferred form of government is
a "social bond that people should enter into willingly ...
The core concept is that of community -- that everyone has a stake in
everyone else's well-being."
The editorial board then reached back into history
and pulled out a quote from a Puritan leader of the Mayflower Compact
period: "'We must delight in each other,' John Winthrop said with
great vision in 1630. Mutual responsibility should be the social
lodestar, requiring everyone to keep in mind, as Winthrop said, 'our
community as members of the same body.'"
The editorial concludes: "The day
Massachusetts starts relying on voluntary contributions is the day it
ceases to be a commonwealth."
Shame on the Boston Globe for selectively taking
history out of context to justify its political ends. Its editorial
writer should know that America's first experiment with socialism was
an abject failure that cost the lives of more than half of the
foundering settlers by 1627. The editorial should have acknowledged
that the failure of communitarianism was quickly rejected in favor of
capitalism and property rights, and that the colony subsequently
thrived.
After living the Boston Globe's philosophy for half
a decade of want, Governor William Bradford and other Puritan founders
of the Plimouth Plantation came to recognize that, despite their
struggles, perseverance and faith, something was very wrong, something
needed to change if they were to survive. In his journal,
"Of Plymouth Plantation," Bradford wrote:
"All this while no supply was heard of,
neither knew they when they might expect any. So they began to think
how they might raise as much corn as they could, and obtain a better
crop than they had done, that they might not still thus languish in
misery."
These were practical men, and as such they looked
for practical solutions that might lend to their survival and that of
those who depended on them:
"At length, after much debate of things, the
Governor (with the advice of the chiefest amongst them) gave way that
they should set corn every man for his own particular, and in that
regard trust to themselves ..."
Governor Bradford and his council established
property rights and free enterprise, self-reliance and
self-motivation, truly a new concept in this new frontier.
Immediately, the result of private industry was quantifiable:
"This had very good success, for it made all
hands very industrious, so as much more corn was planted than
otherwise would have been by any means the Governor or any other could
use, and saved him a great deal of trouble, and gave far better
content. The women now went willingly into the field, and took their
little ones with them to set corn; which before would allege weakness
and inability; whom to have compelled would have been thought great
tyranny and oppression."
As their social experiment in property rights and
capitalism progressed it only got better, making obsolete what the
Boston Globe again advocates:
"The experience that was had in this common
course and condition, tried sundry years and that amongst godly and
sober men, may well evince the vanity of that conceit of Plato's and
other ancients applauded by some of later times; that the taking away
of property and bringing in community into a commonwealth would make
them happy and flourishing; as if they were wiser than God."
Pilgrim leader William Bradford perhaps best summed
up the philosophy of those who today carry the endless burden of
"the most vulnerable among us" in his objective and
apparently-ageless observation:
"For the young men, that were most able and
fit for labour and service, did repine that they should spend their
time and strength to work for other men's wives and children without
any recompense. The strong, or man of parts, had no more in division
of victuals and clothes than he that was weak and not able to do a
quarter the other could; this was thought injustice. The aged and
graver men to be ranked and equalized in labours and victuals,
clothes, etc., with the meaner and younger sort, thought it some
indignity and disrespect unto them. And for men's wives to be
commanded to do service for other men, as dressing their meat, washing
their clothes, etc., they deemed it a kind of slavery, neither could
many husbands well brook it."
While the feel-good Boston Globe would have us
return to the 'halcyon' days of the Mayflower Compact and
its "core concept ... of community," the lesson learned from
its deadly failures stands in stark — and honest
— contrast.
History also provides a dire warning for us:
"Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat
it."
|
Wild turkeys
and Ozzie the Cat voting on what to have for Thanksgiving Day
dinner. CLICK IMAGE TO ENLARGE
—
Photo by Chip Ford
— |
For more information on the first Day of Thanksgiving,
click
here