Help save yourself -- join CLT today!

CLT introduction  and membership  application

What CLT saves you from the auto excise tax alone
Join CLT online through PayPal immediately

CLT UPDATE
Wednesday, March 23, 2011


CLT Memo to the Joint Committee on Election Laws
Hearing today; 1:30 - 3:30 pm, State House Room B1

Chip Faulkner, Associate Director of Citizens for Limited Taxation, will deliver the following memo to the Joint Committee on Election Laws this afternoon and testify at its hearing.


March 23, 2011
To:  The Election Laws Committee
Re:  H. 1830, one of several bills filed to kill the people’s initiative petition process

This bill is just another in a long list of attempts to kill the initiative petition process in Massachusetts. H. 1830 would more than double the number of certified signatures that citizen activists need to put a question on the ballot.

It’s difficult enough to collect the number of signatures required now. The short time period of nine weeks compared to most other initiative petition states, cold and rainy weather in October and November, the unusual “county” requirements, and yes, the loss of most local “town dumps” make the collection of signatures no easy task in this state. In addition, the ridiculous “stray marks” ruling by the SJC several years ago necessitates the collection of 20,000 or so ADDITIONAL signatures just to make sure of the required amount after a petition sheet with numerous voter signatures and a coffee stain is disqualified. I’ve been told no other petition state has anything like this SJC ruling.

Though the broad coalition of citizens who use the petition process have stopped assaults on it in the past, this bill – and at least seven others – have been filed again because some liberal or union-controlled legislators hate seeing the average citizen put issues on the ballot without bowing and scraping to an unresponsive Legislature. For decades taxpayers begged, implored or demanded that the Legislature do something about high property taxes, only to be ignored – until 1979 when signatures were collected and Proposition 2˝ was placed on the 1980 ballot. If the signature requirement called for in H. 1830 had been in effect then, the petition drive would have failed, there’d be no 2˝ law and property taxes would be double or triple what they are now.

We urge members of the Election Laws Committee to preserve the people’s initiative petition process and vote “NO” on H. 1830 – and the other anti-initiative bills which, frankly, we expected to see at this same hearing, as in the past. We are opposed to those that were sent to the Judiciary Committee as well. There is nothing wrong with the initiative petition process that hostile politicians can fix.


Greetings activists and supporters:

Chip Faulkner will be at the State House this afternoon to deliver our memo and testify before the Joint (House and Senate) Committee on Election Laws against the first of several bills proposed to eviscerate the citizens' initiative and referendum process. This process was amended to the state constitution as Article 48 in 1918. For years if not decades Beacon Hill pols have been attacking it, trying to make it more difficult if not impossible. CLT and its allies across the political spectrum have fought back. So far, we have been able to defend and protect the process, despite the relentless assaults. (See:  CLT Update - Feb. 18 - "Initiative petition process under attack, sheesh again")

This year the anti-democratic forces are back with a number of assaults coming from different directions. All attempt to make the constitutional provision that provides an ultimate voice to the people more difficult if not impossible to achieve.

Below is a list of what we've discovered so far. It's interesting to note that the anti-democratic cabal has referred these bills to both the Election Laws Committee AND the Committee on the Judiciary and scheduled them for different times, instead of all on one day as has been the tradition. Tracking them, and taking the time to testify numerous times at different dates and times will make defense of the people's ultimate prerogative far more difficult.

Each year it gets harder to find where these now-expected assaults are buried and when the attacks will surface. Can this be the sponsors' intent for this unusual and onerous scheduling – or is the Legislature really this disorganized?

H01830

http://www.malegislature.gov/Bills/187/House/H01830

Filed By:  Provost

For a legislative amendment to the Constitution relative to the subject matter of initiative and referendum petitions

By Ms. Denise Provost of Somerville, petition (accompanied by proposal for constitutional amendment, House, No. 01830) of Denise Provost for a legislative amendment to the Constitution relative to initiative and referendum petitions. [Joint Committee on Election Laws - Hearing scheduled for 03/23/2011 from 01:30 PM-03:30 PM in B-1]

 

H00206

http://www.malegislature.gov/Bills/187/House/H00206

Filed By:  Stanley

An Act relative to the collection of signatures for initiative and referendum petitions.

By Mr. Stanley of Waltham, petition (accompanied by Bill, House, No. 00206) of Thomas M. Stanley and others relative to the collection of signatures for initiative and referendum petitions. [Joint Committee on Election Laws.]

 

H00207

http://www.malegislature.gov/Bills/187/House/H00207

Filed By:  Stanley

An Act relative to prohibiting the collection of signatures for initiative or referendum petitions for compensation

By Mr. Stanley of Waltham, petition (accompanied by Bill, House, No. 00207) of Thomas M. Stanley and others relative to prohibiting the collection of signatures for initiative or referendum petitions for compensation. [Joint Committee on Election Laws.]

 

H00529

http://www.malegislature.gov/Bills/187/House/H00529

Filed By:  Wolf, Rushing

Proposal for a legislative amendment to the Constitution relative to the subject matter of initiative petitions

By Ms. Wolf of Cambridge, petition (accompanied by Proposal for Constitutional Amendment, House, No. 00529) of Tom Sannicandro and others for a legislative amendment to the Constitution relative to the subject matter of initiative petitions. [Joint Committee on the Judiciary.]

 

H00203

http://www.malegislature.gov/Bills/187/House/H00203

Filed By:  Speliotis

An Act relative to ballot questions.

By Mr. Theodore C. Speliotis of Danvers, petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 00203) of Theodore C. Speliotis for legislation to limit contributions for the promotion or defeat of ballot questions or initiative petitions. [Joint Committee on Election Laws.]

 

H02735

http://www.malegislature.gov/Bills/187/House/H02735

Filed By:  Provost

An Act to protect the integrity of initiative and referendum petitions

By Ms. Provost of Somerville, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 2735) of Jehlen and others relative to initiative and referendum petitions. [Joint Committee on Election Laws.]

 

H01822

http://www.malegislature.gov/Bills/187/House/H01822

Filed By:  Gobi

Proposal to amend the Constitution excluding all matters relating to fisheries and wildlife

By Ms. Anne M. Gobi of Spencer, petition (accompanied by proposal for constitutional amendment, House, No. 01822) of Anne M. Gobi for a legislative amendment to the Constitution to exclude matters relating to fisheries and wildlife from the subject matter of initiative petitions. [Joint Committee on the Judiciary.]

 

S00013

http://www.malegislature.gov/Bills/187/Senate/S00013

Filed By:  Rosenberg

For a legislative amendment to the Constitution relative to the subject matter of initiative and referendum petitions

By Mr. Rosenberg, petition (accompanied by proposal, Senate, No. 13) of Stanley Rosenberg, Kenneth Donnelly, Carl M. Sciortino and other members of the General Court proposal for a legislative amendment to the Constitution relative to the subject matter of initiative and referendum petitions. [Joint Committee on the Judiciary.]

 

S00012

http://www.malegislature.gov/Bills/187/Senate/S00012

Filed By:  Creem

For a legislative amendment to the Constitution relative to the subject matter of initiative petitions

By Ms. Cynthia Creem, petition (accompanied by proposal for constitutional amendment, Senate, No. 00012) of Linda Dorcena Forry, James Eldridge, Marty Walz and other members of the General Court proposal for a legislative amendment to the Constitution relative to the subject matter of initiative petitions. [Joint Committee on the Judiciary.]

 

S00314

http://www.malegislature.gov/Bills/187/Senate/S00314

Filed By:  Rosenberg

An Act to protect the integrity of initiative and referendum petitions.

By Mr. Rosenberg, petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 314) of Provost, Kennedy, Wolf and other members of the General Court for legislation to protect the integrity of initiative and referendum petitions [Joint Committee on Election Laws].

 

Chip Ford


Citizens for Limited Taxation    PO Box 1147    Marblehead, MA 01945    508-915-3665