Help save yourself -- join CLT today!

CLT introduction  and membership  application

What CLT saves you from the auto excise tax alone
Join CLT online through PayPal immediately

CLT UPDATE
Monday, March 14, 2011

Government employee unions on the run ... everywhere but here


 

Congratulations to Wisconsin Republicans, who held together this week to pass their government union reforms despite unprecedented acting out by Democrats and their union allies. Three weeks ago we described this battle as a foretaste of Greece come to America, but maybe there's hope for taxpayers after all....

The collective bargaining reforms also mean that this won't merely be a one-time budget victory. Government unions know that financial concessions (and layoffs) they agree to during recessions are typically won back when tax revenues increase and the public stops paying attention. They merely need to elect a friendly governor. Mr. Walker's reforms change the balance of negotiating power in ways that give taxpayers more protection....

If Mr. Walker's effort can be faulted, we'd say it's for not stressing enough the value of these collective bargaining changes for taxpayers, and how public unions too often end up on both sides of the bargaining table. Instead, he stressed the short-term fiscal benefits of his bill. Yet his changes will pay off in future years in Wisconsin in ways that reforms by GOP Governors in Michigan or even New Jersey will not....

Mr. Walker and his allies have won a rare victory for taxpayers, one which should be a lesson for other states and Governors. The monopoly power of government unions can be broken.

The Wall Street Journal
Friday, March 11, 2011
REVIEW & OUTLOOK
Taxpayers Win in Wisconsin
The monopoly power of government unions can be broken


In 2010, Megan Sampson was named an Outstanding First Year Teacher in Wisconsin. A week later, she got a layoff notice from the Milwaukee Public Schools. Why would one of the best new teachers in the state be one of the first let go? Because her collective-bargaining contract requires staffing decisions to be made based on seniority.

Ms. Sampson got a layoff notice because the union leadership would not accept reasonable changes to their contract. Instead, they hid behind a collective-bargaining agreement that costs the taxpayers $101,091 per year for each teacher, protects a 0% contribution for health-insurance premiums, and forces schools to hire and fire based on seniority and union rules....

In Wisconsin, we can avoid the massive teacher layoffs that schools are facing across America. Our budget-repair bill is a commitment to the future so our children won't face even more dire consequences than we face today, and teachers like Ms. Sampson are rewarded—not laid off.

Taking on the status quo is no easy task. Each day, there are protesters in and around our state Capitol. They have every right to be heard. But their voices cannot drown out the voices of the countless taxpayers who want us to balance our budgets and, more importantly, to make government work for each of them.

The Wall Street Journal
Thursday, March 10, 2011
Why I'm Fighting in Wisconsin
By Scott Walker


Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker signed a bill into law Friday eliminating most collective-bargaining rights for the state's public employees, while boosting how much they will pay for their benefits and making it tougher for public unions to retain members....

"What we've effectively done is protect middle-class jobs and middle-class taxpayers," Mr. Walker said in an interview Friday. "When people realize that I think there's going to be incredible support." ...

The new law calls for all public-employee bargaining agreements to be terminated "as soon as possible," and requires the first of 2,000 new union elections at state and local workplaces to begin in April.

Under the law, unions said it will be more difficult for them to retain members. The new law requires that 51% of all eligible workers—including those who don't vote—approve a union, which means unions can win a majority of votes cast, but still be barred from representing workers.

Previously unions had to win a majority of votes cast. The state also will stop collecting dues automatically as soon as contracts end....

Many union members object to the tougher election requirements. "Annual certification is just a complete tactic to bust the unions," said Chris Fons, a 45-year-old high school teacher from Milwaukee.

Mr. Walker defended the changes in union elections. "It really puts the onus on saying if the union wants to provide value they have to prove it," he said. "If people believe it then they'll come out and vote."

The Wall Street Journal
Saturday, March 12, 2011
Restrictions on Unions Become Law


In the end, Wisconsin Democrats’ three-week sojourn in the Land of Lincoln couldn’t win their state’s civil war over public employee unions. Wisconsin Republicans this week turned the tables on their AWOL colleagues by stripping monetary provisions from Gov. Scott Walker’s legislation and then passing it without need for a quorum....

When that noise has quieted, the reality that will remain is this: Wisconsin lawmakers have delivered a clear win for taxpayers, and perhaps as well a template for courageous governors and lawmakers in other states to begin to curb the pay and benefits of their own public employees.

Make no mistake: The mobs that occupied Wisconsin’s state Capitol for weeks, likened Mr. Walker to Hitler, threatened Republican state senators with physical violence, and claimed that the legislation marked the death of democracy, were playing a losing hand. Because, even after Mr. Walker’s legislative win, public employees there enjoy excellent pay and benefits vis-à-vis most workers. Noisy chants, crass or clever, cannot speak more loudly than simple facts. Taxpayers and voters can do the math for themselves.

Wisconsin, like most states, has more work to do to solve its budget problems. But as of today, public employees in “America’s Dairyland” won’t be milking the taxpayers quite so much as before.

A Telegram & Gazette editorial
Friday, March 11, 2011
Walker wins
Wisconsin moves workers’ cheese


From the time that Wisconsin union members began protesting until the Republicans outmaneuvered absent Democratic lawmakers by stripping state workers of their collective bargaining rights, union supporters went unhinged as Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker sought to restore fiscal sanity by reining in lucrative benefits to public employees. Here are the Top 10 Ugly Moments in the Wisconsin Union Battle. . . .

Human Events
Saturday, March 12, 2011
Top 10 Ugly Moments in the Wisconsin Union Battle


New England Cable News
Thursday, March 10, 2011
Broadside with Jim Braude

Fallout from Wisconsin Protests

(NECN) - Barbara Anderson, Executive Director of Citizens For Limited Taxation
joins Jim Braude on Broadside to discuss the fallout from Wisconsin protests.

The bill to strip collective bargaining rights from public workers
passed the assembly Thursday afternoon.


Chip Ford's CLT Commentary

Momentum to confront unconscionable government unions and reject their demands is spreading throughout the nation, state by state.

An awareness of the schism between public and private sector employees is growing by the day along with resentment over the differential. More citizens are questioning why public employees are and have been doing so much better than their employers -- us taxpayers. The myth promoted for so long by government employee unions, that their benefits are in exchange for comparatively low pay, has been shredded. Their salaries today for comparable jobs outside government are equal to or greater. Immunity from the economic hardships that we in the private sector must confront -- stagnant if not diminishing incomes, lay-offs and joblessness, higher health insurance premiums, collapsing 401K pension plans -- while always demanding more from us has finally pushed taxpayers over the edge.

But we taxpayers in Massachusetts are expected to remain indentured servants to the public employee unions, accepting the status quo without complaint. Here in one of the bluest states in the nation, getting public employee unions to accept a simple less expensive health insurance plan -- one good enough for state worker satisfaction -- is asking for too much of a concession from municipal government unions. Here in the People's Republic, as with most things the incestuous political culture is too inbred to be easily disrupted, even inconvenienced. This must change, now.

As it is, we work too long just to afford keeping them living at a standard better than ours. They won't be satisfied until we work JUST to keep government employees enjoying all the fruits of our labor. This must be stopped, now.

The first place to stop this is, by our Legislature quickly passing the municipal health insurance reform bill without including the government unions' kick-back demand.

 

Chip Ford


 

The Wall Street Journal
Friday, March 11, 2011

REVIEW & OUTLOOK

Taxpayers Win in Wisconsin
The monopoly power of government unions can be broken


Congratulations to Wisconsin Republicans, who held together this week to pass their government union reforms despite unprecedented acting out by Democrats and their union allies. Three weeks ago we described this battle as a foretaste of Greece come to America, but maybe there's hope for taxpayers after all.

The good news is that Governor Scott Walker's reforms have been worth the fight on the policy merits. The conventional media wisdom is that Mr. Walker "overreached" by proposing limits on the ability of government unions to bargain collectively for benefits. But before he offered those proposals, Democrats and unions had refused to support his plan that public workers pay more for their pensions and health care. Only later did they concede that these changes were reasonable and will spare thousands of public workers from layoffs.

The collective bargaining reforms also mean that this won't merely be a one-time budget victory. Government unions know that financial concessions (and layoffs) they agree to during recessions are typically won back when tax revenues increase and the public stops paying attention. They merely need to elect a friendly governor. Mr. Walker's reforms change the balance of negotiating power in ways that give taxpayers more protection.

Unions can still bargain for wages, but annual increases can't exceed the rate of inflation. Unions will also have to be certified each year, which will give their dues-paying members a chance to revisit their decision to unionize. No longer will it be one worker, one vote, once. Perhaps most important, the state will no longer collect those dues automatically and give them to the union to spend almost entirely on politics. The unions will have to collect those dues themselves.

If Mr. Walker's effort can be faulted, we'd say it's for not stressing enough the value of these collective bargaining changes for taxpayers, and how public unions too often end up on both sides of the bargaining table. Instead, he stressed the short-term fiscal benefits of his bill. Yet his changes will pay off in future years in Wisconsin in ways that reforms by GOP Governors in Michigan or even New Jersey will not. A future Wisconsin legislature can change these laws again, but not without a big political reversal.

That's exactly what Democrats and unions now want to engineer, as they promise to launch recall campaigns against state senators who voted for the reforms. Our email inbox has been filling up all week with Democratic fund-raising appeals screaming about Wisconsin. Mr. Walker's poll numbers have slumped amid the raucous debate, and unions will go all-in to punish the GOP.

But under Wisconsin law, only eight of the 18 Republican senators who voted "aye" have served the requisite one year to be subject to recall. And only one of those is in a truly vulnerable district. Republicans would continue to hold 60 of the 99 seats in the state assembly, and if Wisconsin's budget is balanced and the economy is growing a year from now, voters may dismiss the predictions of Apocalypse as hyperbolic.

The real game for unions and Democrats is 2012. After their rout in 2010, they are pursuing what we'd call the Mayhem Strategy to mobilize their base and sour independents on the GOP. Cry havoc and create enough tumult, and many voters may sue for labor peace. This is exactly the strategy that government unions have used to block any welfare-state reforms in Europe. The public is held hostage to government workers who shut down services to stop even modest changes in their workload or benefits.

Mr. Walker and his allies have won a rare victory for taxpayers, one which should be a lesson for other states and Governors. The monopoly power of government unions can be broken.


The Wall Street Journal
Thursday, March 10, 2011

OPINION

Why I'm Fighting in Wisconsin
We can avoid mass teacher layoffs and reward our best performers.
But we have to act now.
By Scott Walker


In 2010, Megan Sampson was named an Outstanding First Year Teacher in Wisconsin. A week later, she got a layoff notice from the Milwaukee Public Schools. Why would one of the best new teachers in the state be one of the first let go? Because her collective-bargaining contract requires staffing decisions to be made based on seniority.

Ms. Sampson got a layoff notice because the union leadership would not accept reasonable changes to their contract. Instead, they hid behind a collective-bargaining agreement that costs the taxpayers $101,091 per year for each teacher, protects a 0% contribution for health-insurance premiums, and forces schools to hire and fire based on seniority and union rules.

My state's budget-repair bill, which passed the Assembly on Feb. 25 and awaits a vote in the Senate, reforms this union-controlled hiring and firing process by allowing school districts to assign staff based on merit and performance. That keeps great teachers like Ms. Sampson in the classroom.

Most states in the country are facing a major budget deficit. Many are cutting billions of dollars of aid to schools and local governments. These cuts lead to massive layoffs or increases in property taxes—or both.

In Wisconsin, we have a better approach to tackling our $3.6 billion deficit. We are reforming the way government works, as well as balancing our budget. Our reform plan gives state and local governments the tools to balance the budget through reasonable benefit contributions. In total, our budget-repair bill saves local governments almost $1.5 billion, outweighing the reductions in state aid in our budget.

While it might be a bold political move, the changes are modest. We ask government workers to make a 5.8% contribution to their pensions and a 12.6% contribution to their health-insurance premium, both of which are well below what other workers pay for benefits. Our plan calls for Wisconsin state workers to contribute half of what federal employees pay for their health-insurance premiums. (It's also worth noting that most federal workers don't have collective bargaining for wages and benefits.)

For example, my brother works as a banquet manager at a hotel and occasionally works as a bartender. My sister-in-law works at a department store. They have two beautiful kids. They are a typical middle-class Wisconsin family. At the start of this debate, David reminded me that he pays nearly $800 per month for his family's health-insurance premium and a modest 401(k) contribution. He said most workers in Wisconsin would love a deal like the one we are proposing.

The unions say they are ready to accept concessions, yet their actions speak louder than words. Over the past three weeks, local unions across the state have pursued contracts without new pension or health-insurance contributions. Their rhetoric does not match their record on this issue.

Local governments can't pass budgets on a hope and a prayer. Beyond balancing budgets, our reforms give schools—as well as state and local governments—the tools to reward productive workers and improve their operations. Most crucially, our reforms confront the barriers of collective bargaining that currently block innovation and reform.

When Gov. Mitch Daniels repealed collective bargaining in Indiana six years ago, it helped government become more efficient and responsive. The average pay for Indiana state employees has actually increased, and high-performing employees are rewarded with pay increases or bonuses when they do something exceptional.

Passing our budget-repair bill will help put similar reforms into place in Wisconsin. This will be good for the Badger State's hard-working taxpayers. It will also be good for state and local government employees who overwhelmingly want to do their jobs well.

In Wisconsin, we can avoid the massive teacher layoffs that schools are facing across America. Our budget-repair bill is a commitment to the future so our children won't face even more dire consequences than we face today, and teachers like Ms. Sampson are rewarded—not laid off.

Taking on the status quo is no easy task. Each day, there are protesters in and around our state Capitol. They have every right to be heard. But their voices cannot drown out the voices of the countless taxpayers who want us to balance our budgets and, more importantly, to make government work for each of them.

Mr. Walker, a Republican, is the governor of Wisconsin.


The Wall Street Journal
Saturday, March 12, 2011

Restrictions on Unions Become Law
By Kris Maher and Douglas Belkin


MADISON, Wis.—Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker signed a bill into law Friday eliminating most collective-bargaining rights for the state's public employees, while boosting how much they will pay for their benefits and making it tougher for public unions to retain members.

Mr. Walker said the law will save workers' jobs and help get the state on a better financial footing. He rescinded layoff notices to 1,500 state employees Friday, and said the bill would save $30 million through June.

"What we've effectively done is protect middle-class jobs and middle-class taxpayers," Mr. Walker said in an interview Friday. "When people realize that I think there's going to be incredible support."

House Democratic Minority Leader Peter Barca countered that the governor could have achieved the cost savings without eliminating bargaining rights, because unions already had agreed to contribute more for benefits. He said the governor, instead, chose to pursue a "radical assault on the rights of Wisconsin's working families."

Democratic lawmakers said the 14 Senate Democrats who left the state Feb. 17 to boycott the bill plan to return to the Capitol on Saturday and speak at a labor rally.

The new law calls for all public-employee bargaining agreements to be terminated "as soon as possible," and requires the first of 2,000 new union elections at state and local workplaces to begin in April.

Under the law, unions said it will be more difficult for them to retain members. The new law requires that 51% of all eligible workers—including those who don't vote—approve a union, which means unions can win a majority of votes cast, but still be barred from representing workers.

Previously unions had to win a majority of votes cast. The state also will stop collecting dues automatically as soon as contracts end.

Peter Davis, general counsel of the Wisconsin Employee Relations Committee, the state agency that oversees union elections, said he didn't believe any other state requires unions to win a majority of eligible voters.

He also said the huge number of new elections will overwhelm his 20-person agency, which typically handles 50 elections a year. The agency doesn't have the resources to conduct 2,000 elections in April for 200,000 workers affected by the bill, he said.

Many union members object to the tougher election requirements. "Annual certification is just a complete tactic to bust the unions," said Chris Fons, a 45-year-old high school teacher from Milwaukee.

Mr. Walker defended the changes in union elections. "It really puts the onus on saying if the union wants to provide value they have to prove it," he said. "If people believe it then they'll come out and vote."

Now that the bill is passed, lawmakers will begin to debate Mr. Walker's two-year budget. Andrew Welhouse, a spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald, said because of the high level of interest in the governor's two-year budget proposal, which cuts more than $1 billion in funding to schools and local governments, large venues like the Bradley Center, home of the Milwaukee Bucks, are being considered for public hearings in April.

"We don't want to turn anyone away," he said.


The (Worcester) Telegram & Gazette
Friday, March 11, 2011

A Telegram & Gazette editorial
Walker wins
Wisconsin moves workers’ cheese


In the end, Wisconsin Democrats’ three-week sojourn in the Land of Lincoln couldn’t win their state’s civil war over public employee unions. Wisconsin Republicans this week turned the tables on their AWOL colleagues by stripping monetary provisions from Gov. Scott Walker’s legislation and then passing it without need for a quorum.

Stand by now for a week or so of dueling opinion pieces, commentary and news stories focusing on charges that the Republican move was somehow illegal or undemocratic, with countercharges that democracy began to unravel the day the Democrats fled the state in a futile effort to thwart the governor.

When that noise has quieted, the reality that will remain is this: Wisconsin lawmakers have delivered a clear win for taxpayers, and perhaps as well a template for courageous governors and lawmakers in other states to begin to curb the pay and benefits of their own public employees.

Make no mistake: The mobs that occupied Wisconsin’s state Capitol for weeks, likened Mr. Walker to Hitler, threatened Republican state senators with physical violence, and claimed that the legislation marked the death of democracy, were playing a losing hand. Because, even after Mr. Walker’s legislative win, public employees there enjoy excellent pay and benefits vis-à-vis most workers. Noisy chants, crass or clever, cannot speak more loudly than simple facts. Taxpayers and voters can do the math for themselves.

Wisconsin, like most states, has more work to do to solve its budget problems. But as of today, public employees in “America’s Dairyland” won’t be milking the taxpayers quite so much as before.


Human Events
Saturday, March 12, 2011

Top 10 Ugly Moments in the Wisconsin Union Battle


http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=42247

From the time that Wisconsin union members began protesting until the Republicans outmaneuvered absent Democratic lawmakers by stripping state workers of their collective bargaining rights, union supporters went unhinged as Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker sought to restore fiscal sanity by reining in lucrative benefits to public employees. Here are the Top 10 Ugly Moments in the Wisconsin Union Battle.

1. Fleeing the state: Fourteen Democratic Wisconsin state senators dealt a blow to democracy by fleeing the state to avoid a vote on the union reform measure. For three weeks, they abdicated their responsibility to do the job they were elected to do. In November, Wisconsin voters elected a GOP governor and large Republican majorities in the statehouse. As President Obama once said: “Elections have consequences.”

2. Nasty signs: The mainstream media was in a tizzy about signs at Tea Party rallies that pictured Obama with a Hitler mustache, but there was no similar outrage about the intemperate signs at the Wisconsin protests. Here is a sampling: “Hitler Outlawed Unions Too,” “Scott Walker = Adolf Hitler,” and “Walker Terrorizes Families.”

3. Damage to capitol: The state capitol in Madison sustained $7.5 million in damage from the tens of thousands of protesters gathered to voice opposition to the union reform vote. Most of the damage came from tape used to attach signs and placards to the marble walls inside the capitol rotunda. When the Republicans finally passed the collective bargaining measure, mobs of protesters broke into the state capitol, climbing through windows and creating further damage.

4. Fake doctor’s notes: It was bad enough when schoolteachers abandoned their students in already underachieving schools in order to protect their pension benefits, but they compounded the sin by excusing their absences with fake doctor’s notes handed out at protests.

5. Town hall shoutdown: Rep. James Sensenbrenner and state Sen. Leah Vukmir had to end a town hall meeting in Wauwatosa after screaming protesters kept interrupting the event. Pro-union hecklers continually shouted during the proceedings and chanted “Shame” as the Republican lawmakers exited the meeting.

6. SEIU scuffle: The owner of the Easy Street Cafe in Madison called 911 when a group of union protesters, led by members of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) Local 1199, stormed his restaurant and verbally accosted seven Republican state senators who were sharing a meal after a vote at the capitol. The group of about 10 people chanted and shouted obscenities at the legislators. When asked to leave by the owner, they refused and got into a scuffle with the restaurant staff.

7. FreedomWorks scuffle: Unions protesters—including members of SEIU, NEA, AFSCME, CWA, and the Teamsters—descended upon the Washington, D.C, offices of FreedomWorks, a pro-Tea Party organization that has been outspoken in favor of Gov. Walker’s union-reform measures. One union member took a video camera from FreedomWorks staffer Tabitha Hale, threw it to the ground and then hit her with his protest sign, which said, “CWA: Taking a Stand for Justice.”

8. “Get bloody”: Apparently Rep. Mike Capuano (D.-Mass.) never got the message after the Tucson shootings that political speech containing violent references was inappropriate. At a Boston rally in solidarity with the Wisconsin union protests, Capuano told the crowd: “I am proud to be here with people who understand that it’s more than just sending an e-mail to get you going. Every once in a while you need to get out on the streets and get a little bloody when necessary."

9. “You are [expletive] dead”: After a vote on union reform that ended a 60-hour Democratic filibuster in the Wisconsin State Assembly, state Rep. Gordon Hintz turned to Republican state Rep. Michelle Litjens and said, “You are [expletive] dead.” Litjens later told radio talk show host Laura Ingraham that Democrats were “throwing fits on a regular basis, looking like a group of toddlers throwing a temper tantrum.”

10. Michael Moore rants: Director Michael Moore, who has made millions with his left-wing movie screeds, is using the Wisconsin controversy to stoke class warfare. He said that private wealth is a “national resource” that belongs to all the people, called for jailing the rich, and wants a national “student walkout” in response to the Wisconsin union vote.

 

NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml


Citizens for Limited Taxation    PO Box 1147    Marblehead, MA 01945    508-915-3665