CLT UPDATE
Monday, June 25, 2007

O'migosh, no more jocks at taxpayer expense?!?


In Saugus, officials are shuttering the library, eliminating 10 public safety positions, closing one of only two fire stations, and cutting up to 27 educators and support staff in the public schools.

The Boston Globe
Wednesday  June 20, 2007
The days of financial reckoning
By John Hamill and Thomas Ambrosino


The school committee also eliminated 54 coaching positions, and the middle school arts and music programs.

WBZ TV4 -- CBS4
Saturday, June 23, 2007
High School Sports May Be Cut From Stoneham Budget


Chip Ford's CLT Commentary

"Fifty-four coaching positions?"  In Stoneham alone?  Oh my goodness, the hardships to come . . . bridges may fall, children may die!  They probably must, first.

Say what?  This is "cutting to the bone" enough for senior citizens to be dislocated, made homeless?  Do the Boston Red Sox or New England Patriots have 54 coaching positions?  Why not?

And are the Red Sox or Patriots coaches collecting benefits and pensions paid by taxpayers who can't afford their own mortgages and property taxes?  Have the big team owners threaten children for a few more bucks?

Oh boy, Proposition 2˝ override failures surely are revealing things we never before knew . . . aren't they now?

Can this be a bad thing?

Chip Ford

 


The Boston Globe
Wednesday, June 20, 2007

The days of financial reckoning
By John Hamill and Thomas Ambrosino


In Saugus, officials are shuttering the library, eliminating 10 public safety positions, closing one of only two fire stations, and cutting up to 27 educators and support staff in the public schools.

In Northbridge, the public schools are laying off 64 teachers and 23 support staff members, moving from full-day to half-day kindergarten, and eliminating language courses in the middle school.

These are not isolated stories. According to The Boston Globe's Override Central, 60 percent of override votes are failing this year and cities and towns across Massachusetts are increasingly facing similar, difficult choices to cut education, public safety, and other municipal services.

These daily headlines underline what is fundamentally wrong with municipal government in Massachusetts -- the basic business model of local government is beginning to fail.

Three years ago, the Metro Mayors Coalition brought a group of stakeholders and specialists together in a Municipal Finance Task Force to coordinate a study of 25 years of municipal finances, local aid, and local expenditures. The task force published the report "Communities at Risk," which analyzed why almost every community -- city or town, affluent or poor, from Cape Cod to the Berkshires -- was struggling financially. The report is available at www.mapc.org.

For taxpayers, the story of municipal government over the past decade is universal: higher property taxes and increased fees combined with diminished public services and deferred investments in infrastructure. Faced with this zero sum game, the politics of local government has turned increasingly sour.

There is reason to hope that this gloomy picture may improve. A number of proposals in Governor Deval Patrick's Municipal Partnership Act would make a real difference.

For example, municipal government should have revenue options that do not depend on residential property taxpayers. The Municipal Partnership Act would give cities and towns options to raise revenues by modest increases in meals and lodging taxes. Even a 1 percent local option meals tax could raise as much as $120 million for Massachusetts cities and towns. These options would take pressure off the property tax and help fund critical local services.

The act also includes a local option for municipalities to join the Group Insurance Commission, which provides health coverage to state workers. According to the Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation, the commission's premiums rose by an annual average of 6.6 percent between 2001 and 2005, compared with increases of 13 percent annually for municipalities. Joining the Group Insurance Commission could save municipalities millions of dollars, while still providing outstanding health insurance options to their employees.

The act also starts an important dialogue about the need for increased home rule power for municipalities to manage themselves and creates a commission focused on breaking down barriers toward regional service delivery.

These common-sense changes would help financially struggling cities and towns, and take the pressure off residential and commercial property taxpayers. Municipal government educates our children, protects our lives and property, maintains our local network of roads, and provides services from libraries to senior centers.

We cannot continue to let municipal government fail. The House and Senate can provide meaningful relief by adopting these necessary reforms, so that layoffs and service cuts will no longer be front-page news.

John Hamill is chairman of Sovereign Bank New England and chairman of the Municipal Finance Task Force. Thomas Ambrosino is mayor of Revere and chairman of the Metro Mayors Coalition.


WBZ TV4 -- CBS4
Saturday, June 23, 2007

High School Sports May Be Cut From Stoneham Budget
Paul Burton


Come football season, the only spirals at Stoneham High School will be attached to notebooks. That's because voters just defeated an override -- spurring a slew of budget cuts, including town sports.

Now, students are still hoping for a miracle comeback.

Even though their high school athletic program may completely wiped-out next fall, on Tuesday, the town defeated a $3 million override which sparked a number of cuts, including the town's entire high school sports program. For sophomore Shawn Secondini, it means the end of a long tradition. "Sports has been my whole life its tradition in my family to play sports. My grandfather went here my father went here and I have had cousins go here now I m here as a generation."

"It's completely devastating… thinking about moving to a new town," said Stoneham senior Tim Lee.

The school committee also eliminated 54 coaching positions, and the middle school arts and music programs.

"But the voters voted against the override? I was one of them that did … I have to be truthful," said Donna Secondini, a Stoneham parent. "I voted against the override because its time the town look closely at the budget and live within the budget."

But there is still hope for Stoneham. If the town votes for a trash fee or finds other money they could restore the cuts and keep the sports.

"That's the rumor and it's a substantiated one that if the trash fee comes back then the sports program will come back," said parent Susan Jepson.

On Tuesday, Stoneham selectman will meet to consider continuing the town's trash fee, which would bring in at least $1 million to the town.

Overrides and budget cuts have been a big issue this year. Statewide, an estimated 33 communities have also ejected overrides this spring -- forcing many cities and towns to make tough decisions.


NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml


Return to CLT Updates page