Train wreck ahead; better get off the tracks
© by Barbara Anderson

The Eagle-Tribune
Sunday, September 29, 2013


So here we are, in late September, being told that the government might shut down next week and then default on its debt in mid-October. And it’s all some Republicans’ fault?

Let’s make sure I understand this. Starting with the basics:

Unlike our state and local budget years, which begin on July 1 (with mandated balanced budgets by the way), the federal government budget year begins on Oct. 1. The House has the constitutionally mandated responsibility to initiate all spending bills, including budgets. The Senate then agrees or disagrees; the President gets to sign or veto.

This last step is supposed to be done by Oct. 1. There is no requirement that the federal budget be balanced. If expenditures exceed revenues, the federal government can borrow the difference and add it to the national debt, which as of last weekend was $16,745,555,054,000 of which my twin grandchildren owe $105,746.

Sometimes the federal government borrows from other countries; sometimes it borrows from itself, or a form of itself called the Federal Reserve, which buys government bonds. It also “stimulates the economy.”

Where does the Federal Reserve get the money to buy bonds and to stimulate the economy? Thank you for asking, but it’s not your job to question where the money comes from. It’s your job to “Spend!” so that jobs are allegedly created to provide what you are spending on, even if most of the money involved in this process is borrowed/printed/made up, or taken in taxes from people who then can’t spend their own money or save it in accounts from which it can be borrowed for genuine economic activity.

To make it all so much more interesting, this year the new budget year coincides with the implementation of the “Affordable Care Act” (Obamacare), a law which passed in 2010 with only Democratic support; those who questioned its size and complexity were told by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi that “we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what’s in it.”

So, to find out what’s in it, I bought “ObamaCare Survival Guide” by Nick J. Tate, who made an admirable effort to sort it all out as objectively as possible. But now my copy is stuffed with newspaper clippings telling about things that have been found wrong with it: there are already exemptions for certain privileged groups, which include Congress itself. Some headlines: “Limits on consumer costs in health care law delayed” (no longer so affordable?); “Multiple Companies Changing Insurance Plans Due To Obamacare;” “State lawmakers raise concerns about navigating Obamacare health exchanges.” So, former Speaker Nancy (Republicans took over the House in 2010 by running against Obamacare so she lost her speakership): “What’s in it” seems to be creating problems.

Therefore, many Congressional Republicans are trying to prevent what Sen. Max Baucus (a Democrat who helped lead the fight to pass it) calls a “train wreck.” The House, passing the federal budget for which it is responsible, removed funding for Obamacare, which along with its administrative chaos, is estimated by a Senate Budget Committee study to cost $2.6 trillion over 10 years.

Obama and Democrat leaders want bipartisan compromise, i.e., they want it all done their way. They seem to think that our Founding Fathers made a mistake in giving the House the “power of the purse.” The president and Senate insist on their own version of the budget, which will include Obamacare.

As for raising the debt ceiling, quoting Nancy Pelosi again, resistance to adding even more debt is “completely juvenile ... legislative arson.” President Obama tells us that “raising the debt ceiling as we have done over a hundred times, does not increase our debt; it does not somehow promote profligacy. All it does is it says you got to pay the bills that you’ve already racked up.”

Say what?! Yes, you’ve got to pay the bills that you racked up under the present debt ceiling, from your existing budget revenues. Raising the ceiling says you intend to borrow even more. How does he think the debt got to almost $17 trillion?

So, what do you think? Should Republicans roll over, fund the train wreck, uncomplainingly agree to another unbalanced budget, borrow until the national debt doubles again?

The Republican House has passed a budget, sans Obamcare. If the president and other Democrats refuse to accept it, they, not Republicans, will be shutting down the government.

Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, Marco Rubio and other Senate Republicans are fighting valiantly in the Senate against government takeover of our health care.

Keeping ObamCare will continue to hurt the economy. Trying to avoid its costs and bureaucracy, businesses are keeping the number of their full-time employment below the level that triggers mandatory compliance; many have moved employees to part-time. It should be quickly repealed, and both parties should begin work on a truly non-partisan plan for more affordable health care.

But if Democrats won’t do that, here’s one possible compromise: Agree on another “continuing resolution” to fund existing essential government services, and put a hold on Obamacare until 2015. Then ask American voters in 2014 to choose representatives who support the train wreck and unlimited spending and debt or those who want fiscal responsibility. Our decision, our country’s future.

The comments made and opinions expressed in her columns are those of Barbara Anderson
and do not necessarily reflect those of Citizens for Limited Taxation.

Barbara Anderson is executive director of Citizens for Limited Taxation. Her column appears weekly in the Salem News and other Eagle-Tribune newspapers.

More of Barbara's Columns

Citizens for Limited Taxation    PO Box 1147    Marblehead, MA 01945    508-915-3665