Friday, June 22, 2001
"It's time to put your money
where your mouth is"
"It's time to put your money where your mouth is.
You didn't want it; give it away. You don't like the budget; make your own."
Boston Globe Columnist
Jun. 21, 2001
Our Voluntary Tax concept is catching on ... even among liberals! Did you ever expect to see those above
words published in the Boston Globe?
Or one of CLT's letters to the editor published so quickly (or at all)? [My letter, published today, follows
Year after year, an organization that tracks charitable giving in all 50 states consistently ranks
Massachusetts at the bottom, last year 49th. Could this be due to the overwhelming
liberal population here; to their utter lack of comprehension for giving voluntarily; to their total dependence on government
and only government to address problems? It wouldn't surprise me.
But we've got their attention at last with our alternative: "You said you don't want or need it; simply don't
That has always be an incomprehensible notion for liberals. Propose it and they look at you like a deer in
But today, it's catching on.
PS. Note that Ms. Goodman doesn't want government deciding how
to spend her tax rebate: "they'll use it for some missile fantasy." I wonder if she yet realizes that we all feel
this way, when government takes almost 50 percent or our earnings for priorities and programs with which we might
disagree? But, she is "growing"!
The Boston Globe
Thursday, June 21, 2001
Hush, everybody, the tax cut is coming
By Ellen Goodman
OK, so you were an opponent of the tax cut. You called the
president's "tax relief" a four-letter word: S-C-A-M. You ranted about how the $1.3 trillion cut would benefit the
rich at the expense of the rest.
When you heard about the $300 rebate, you sneered, "Oh
goody, I'm rich." You figured that could pay for one month of your mom's prescription drugs or buy three sets of
silver-plated place card holders from Saks Fifth Avenue. And when you discovered that 35 million
low-income workers -- those who need it the most -- would get no rebate at all, you just
about went apoplectic.
Well, guess what, pal: You're gonna get the money anyway.
They don't just give the rebate to people who agree with the policy. You're one of the 91 million Americans who are going
to be getting a big fat collective $38 billion.
Soon you'll get a letter announcing this with a fanfare: "We
are pleased to inform you that the United States Congress passed -- and President George W. Bush signed into law -- the
Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001, which provides long-term tax
relief for all Americans who pay income taxes."
This will read like a rouse from Publishers Clearing House
or a fund-raiser from the Republican National Committee, but it's from the IRS, and the message is simple: Here
The letter says something else: "You will be receiving a
check. You need to take no additional steps." But there, dear IRS, I beg to differ. You do need to take additional steps.
You need to figure out what you'll do with your 300 ill-gained bucks.
I know. Many folks regard the rebates as their money wrenched back from the thieves in
Washington. Many regard it as found money, picked up on the sidewalk of a forgetful
administration. Some regard it as house money in the big gamble of the Bush budget.
But you have a suspicion that it's also hush money designed
to create silent accomplices.
It's time to put your money where your mouth is. You didn't
want it; give it away. You don't like the budget; make your own.
"This is like a giant social experiment," says Richard
Thau, president of Third Millennium, an advocacy group for young adults. "If you send unexpected money to tens of millions of
households, what percentages of those households will give all or part of the rebate to
Thau is going to donate his own rebate to a program for
homeless women. But his group has set up DonateRebate.org, a site that leads to Helping.org, which lists 700,000 nonprofit
groups. Many help the people that are hurt the most.
Tony Adams, a Houston Web site developer and a political
"in-activist," goes a step further. The 35-year-old Adams, engaged to a woman who "pledged her rebate to shoes," didn't
even vote in the last election. But he was so infuriated when Bush reinstituted the global gag
rule against international family planning groups, he pledged his rebate to "help
counteract Bush's actions."
His new Web site, TaxRebatePledge.org, has already attracted
more than 300 people who promised more than $100,000 to groups that oppose the administration on such things as
international family planning, the environment, and civil rights. "People
think I'm some kind of a liberal wacko," says Adams. "If your country is a car and about to veer off the road to the
right, you got to jerk it pretty hard to the left to get it back onto the center."
Now I know that despite all your ranting, it's easiest to
cash the check. You could pay down the credit cards or invest both checks at 8 percent and have $6,500 in 2031. Heck, no
one-time rebate is going to create an alternative budget or an alternative politics. Your whole
point is that individuals can't replace every function of a government. And you can't
send it back to the government, or they'll use it for some missile fantasy.
But you've got a month or more to turn this rebate scam into
a discussion about how to make a difference, where to begin and what's most important. You can be a $300-a-person
philanthropist, a $600-a-couple social change agent.
And while you're putting your money where your mouth is, why
let the tax-cut supporters off the hook? Didn't they tell us that private folks use the money more wisely than Washington?
When George W. signed this tax cut, he said, "This bill is
more than just tax relief. This bill reflects a philosophy that says we trust the American people more than we trust
Now there's $38 billion coming our way. Sometimes hush money
can make a very loud statement.
The Boston Globe
Friday, June 22, 2001
Letters to the Editor
Forced to take a tax cut?
ELLEN GOODMAN'S June 21 column was right on the money ("Hush,
everybody, the tax cut is coming," op ed). Nobody should be forced to take or spend a tax cut against their will.
This is why Citizens for Limited Taxation filed a bill, a
version of which is included in the Massachusetts House budget now in conference committee, that provides for a voluntary tax
checkoff. It allows that 41 percent of voters who said "no" to Question 4 last November,
those who stated they don't need or want a tax cut, to turn it down and continue paying the
higher rate on state taxes.
We agree with Goodman: "It's time to put your money where
your mouth is. You didn't want it; give it away."
Director of Operations
Citizens for Limited Taxation
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this
material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes
only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml