CITIZENS   FOR  LIMITED  TAXATION
and the
Citizens Economic Research Foundation

CLT UPDATE
Thursday, January 12, 2006

Voters again get the mule's attention with our two-by-four


I rise to address one word. A word that has been used in the discussions leading to this debate. The word is illegal. Some of you, no doubt, got a memo from the group that is opposed to this legislation and in that they have a sentence that says we must ask again what part of illegal do people not understand?

State House News Service
Wednesday, January 11, 2006
House Debate
[Excerpt] Floor speech by Rep. Byron Rushing
Supporter of Tuition Bill


You take Michael Widmer, we've come to rely on him. He's supporting this bill. Please, I could go on stage and be a comedian on this one. Good for the economy? Haven't you read the headlines? 1,000 jobs shipped overseas. Haven't you ever tried to get service for your computer? Don't come here if you're looking for an American job. Our jobs are coming to you overseas. We have the unemployed who need jobs. You're going to educate people who are going to take the jobs that our people need. What could Michael be thinking? It's fuzzy math.

State House News Service
Wednesday, January 11, 2006
House Debate
[Excerpt] Floor speech by Rep. Marie Parente
Opponent of the Tuition Bill


The contentious, at times ugly and misinformed debate, stoked by the fires of fear and hatred swayed legislators to dismiss the hard work and aspirations of immigrant students....

Noorani continued, "The fear and hatred that fueled today’s vote are a product of the Romney administration’s sheer contempt for the community."

MIRA News Release
Wednesday, January 11, 2006
Students' dreams of an education crushed


Ali Noorani, executive director of the Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition, blamed the defeat on what he called "fear and misinformation" by the Romney administration. He said supporters will try again next year.

"This is not an issue that is going to go away and we are not a community that is going away," he said.

Associated Press
Thursday, January 11, 2006
House defeats in-state tuition bill
for undocumented immigrants


House Minority Leader Bradley Jones (R-North Reading), an opponent of the legislation, said supporters never got an accurate tally of how many colleagues planned to vote in favor of the bill.

"The house of cards collapsed," Jones said in an interview immediately following the vote. Jones said many supporters who in the end voted against the bill did so due to the "political liability" of voting in favor of providing benefits to illegal immigrants....

"I'm no longer surprised by the power of fear, and that's what won today … This administration has propagated the politics of fear in a remarkably relentless and ruthless way," said Ali Noorani, executive director of the Massachusetts Immigrants and Refugee Advocacy Coalition.

In response, [Julie Teer, press secretary for Gov. Mitt Romney] said, "This is not about fear or scare tactics. This is about the law, and it's a matter of following the law - and not providing incentives." ...

Noorani said the bill's proponents would file the legislation again next session.

"This is not an issue and we are not a community that's going away," he said.

State House News Service
Wednesday, January 11, 2006
House rejects by 57-97
bill granting undocumented in-state tuition


Massachusetts House members last night decisively defeated a controversial bill to extend in-state tuition rates at public colleges to undocumented immigrants, effectively killing the measure for this year.

The 96-to-57 tally surprised advocates of the bill, who believed they had enough votes to win approval in the House and at one point were predicting they may have enough support to override a certain veto from Governor Mitt Romney.

Opponents of the bill appeared well organized, and in recent days they had flooded some legislators with phone calls urging them to vote against the measure. Some lawmakers were told they would face opponents in this fall's elections if they supported the bill....

The subject has divided candidates for governor here, with Lieutenant Governor Kerry Healey a leading opponent of the in-state tuition and Attorney General Thomas F. Reilly strongly supporting it.

The Boston Globe
Thursday, January 12, 2006
Immigrant tuition bill defeated
Mass. House votes no on rate cut for the undocumented


Chip Ford's CLT Commentary

When it comes to "hate speech," Ali Noorani sure would be hard to top -- talk about spewing venom!  Funny how easily you can spot the true haters without a scorecard.

The State House News Service reported, "Outside the chamber after the vote, Rep. Byron Rushing told a crowd of students, 'Just remember, we get a Democratic governor next year, and you only need 81 votes.'"

That should immediately become Lt. Governor Healey's campaign slogan -- one that should grab the attention of every voter in the Commonwealth.  With her apparent Democrat opponent, Attorney General Tom Reilly, having staked out his position of support for tax subsidies for illegal immigrants, it marks a clear distinction between them on this issue.  But more importantly, yesterday proponents and supporters of the bill needed a two-thirds vote if they were to override Republican Governor Romney's promised veto if the bill passed.  As with so many other issues we oppose, a simple majority spelled defeat for its proponents.

"We're told these immigrants come to take jobs Americans don't want, but now you want to educate them so they can take jobs Americans do want and need."  Those words, or close to them, were part of yesterday's passionate floor speech of State Rep. Marie Parente (D-Milford), the lead opponent of the bill to grant taxpayer-subsidized in-state tuition to illegal immigrants.

The State House News Service reported that House Minority Leader Bradley Jones noted: "many supporters who in the end voted against the bill did so due to the 'political liability' of voting in favor of providing benefits to illegal immigrants."

Earlier in the day, [House Speaker] DiMasi and lead sponsor Rep. Marie St. Fleur (D-Dorchester) sent a letter to their colleagues outlining amendments that would "clarify and strengthen" the bill.... Several members of DiMasi's leadership team defected from the speaker's effort to pass the bill. Votes against included: Lida Harkins (D-Needham), the assistant majority leader; Thomas Petrolati (D-Ludlow), the speaker pro tempore; Robert DeLeo (D-Winthrop), chairman of the Ways and Means committee.

This is a further example of the muscle voters still can flex, when and if they decide to flex it.  As in the '80s, we're starting to see some Democrats standing up to their leadership, a good sign. Voters turned around a given outcome with Melanie's Law, another with the retroactive capital gains tax, and now this misguided bill on tax subsidies for illegal aliens. Voters can still get the mule's attention with a two-by-four, even in Massachusetts.

Chip Ford


Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition
MIRA News Release
January 11, 2006
Students' dreams of an education crushed


Today, on a 57-96 vote, the Massachusetts House of Representatives defeated the In-State Tuition Bill (H.1230).

The contentious, at times ugly and misinformed debate, stoked by the fires of fear and hatred swayed legislators to dismiss the hard work and aspirations of immigrant students.

The In-State Tuition Bill (H.1230) allows students who have attended high school in Massachusetts for at least 3 years the ability to pay the same rate any resident of Massachusetts would pay – granted they have graduated from a Massachusetts high school.

The bill does not provide access to any financial aid or scholarships, and merely allows all immigrant students to pay the same rate as their high school classmates.

"We thank Speaker of the House Sal DiMasi, the Attorney General Tom Reilly, and all the courageous legislators who stood with the immigrant community on today’s difficult vote," said Ali Noorani, executive director of the Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition. "Students across Massachusetts have engaged our country’s democratic system on this issue – their hard work, dedication and passion is an inspiration, and bodes well for the Commonwealth in spite of today’s outcome."

Noorani continued, "The fear and hatred that fueled today’s vote are a product of the Romney administration’s sheer contempt for the community. In fact, his record of eliminating health insurance for elderly and disabled immigrants, and now leading the fight against the In State Tuition Bill, shows what type of immigrant he values: unless an immigrant is of the age and skills to push a broom or clean a toilet, Governor Romney sees no need for them in Massachusetts."

###

MIRA works to advocate for the rights and opportunities of immigrants and refugees. In partnership with its members, MIRA advances this mission through education, training, leadership development, organizing, policy analysis and advocacy.

In Massachusetts, a growing number of youth have decided to fight for their own futures by forming SIM (the Student Immigrant Movement). Members of the SIM who would benefit from the DREAM Act and the In-State Tuition Bill are available to talk to the press. Contact Michele Rudy at (617) 350-5480 ext. 206 to arrange interviews.

Return to top


Associated Press
Thursday, January 11, 2006

House defeats in-state tuition bill
for undocumented immigrants
By Steve LeBlanc


House lawmakers soundly defeated a bill Wednesday that have would allowed undocumented immigrant students to pay the same in-state tuition at state colleges as Massachusetts residents.

The students and their supporters had argued that the children of illegal immigrants who have graduated from Massachusetts high schools should pay the same tuition as their classmates.

But opponents, including Gov. Mitt Romney and Lt. Gov. Kerry Healey, said the state shouldn't reward illegal immigration.

The 57-96 defeat was a blow to the Democratic leadership in the House, which had pushed for the bill. Earlier in the day House Speaker Salvatore DiMasi, D-Boston, had sent a letter to lawmakers urging them to support the bill.

Moments after the vote, DiMasi said he was disappointed, but said he hadn't pressured lawmakers, calling it a "conscience vote." He said he had promised supporters he would schedule a vote, but left it up to them to round up support.

"It wasn't an issue I was out trying to garner support for," DiMasi said in an interview in his office. "I was fully aware it was an uphill battle."

DiMasi said he didn't think the public fully understood the issue. He also blamed federal immigration policy, which he said unfairly shifts the burden on how to deal with undocumented immigrants to the states. He said postponing the voted wouldn't have altered the outcome.

"Delaying it I don't think would have changed anything," he said.

A Romney spokeswoman said the House made the right decision.

"Gov. Romney commends the members of the House who recognize, as we all do, that it is wrong to reward illegal immigration," said Romney spokeswoman Julie Teer.

Ali Noorani, executive director of the Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition, blamed the defeat on what he called "fear and misinformation" by the Romney administration. He said supporters will try again next year.

"This is not an issue that is going to go away and we are not a community that is going away," he said.

The defeat came after more than six hours of heated debate.

Rep. Marie St. Fleur, D-Boston, one of the bill's sponsors, said the bill made sense not only for the students, but for the state, which is losing population and relies on educated workers.

"We've educated them, We've invested in them and they have committed to being the best that they can be," she said. "All these children are asking for is the power to pay the same tuition rate as their peers."

Rep. Marie Parente, D-Milford, said the issue wasn't about education, but about money. She also said the state shouldn't be educating undocumented students so they can take higher paying jobs from legal residents.

"You're not stopping anyone from going to college. They're here because they want money," she told lawmakers during the debate. "America is fighting for its sovereignty today."

Before the vote Romney told reporters he thought there will be changes in federal immigrant law, but until then Massachusetts should focus on helping legal immigrants.

"We have a responsibility to uphold the law of the land and those individuals who are not here legally, in my view, should not receive a special benefit," he said. "There's not a bottomless pit in terms of money, and we can decide where to spend it."

Dozens of students gathered at the Statehouse to watch the debate.

Patricia Oliveira, 20, said her parents brought her to the U.S. from Brazil when she was six. She graduated from Cambridge Rindge and Latin High School in 2003 and is working to get a green card, but can't afford college since she can't obtain grants, loans or financial aid.

She said the bill won't make the state a magnet for undocumented students.

"When you are facing poverty, war or hunger at home, you're not choosing a state based on an in-state tuition rate," she said.

Lawmakers launched the debate by overwhelmingly approving a resolution calling on the U.S. Congress to create a federal policy to help states grappling with undocumented students.

"Why aren't we putting pressure on the Congress of the United States to take up this issue?" said House Majority Leader Lida Harkins, D-Needham.

Unauthorized immigrant students can become eligible for in-state tuition in nine states -- California, Illinois, Kansas, New Mexico, New York, Oklahoma Texas, Utah, and Washington -- according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

Return to top


State House News Service
Wednesday, January 11, 2006

House rejects by 57-97
bill granting undocumented in-state tuition
By Amy Lambiaso and Jim O'Sullivan


After more than six hours of emotional debate, the House voted 57 to 97 Wednesday evening to defeat legislation allowing children of undocumented immigrants to pay in-state tuition rates at state colleges.

The vote came as dozens of students watched the debate from the gallery and comforted each other after the House adjourned for the day. Leading supporters of the bill offered students encouraging words following the session, while others declined to speak to reporters because of the emotional nature of the issue.

House Minority Leader Bradley Jones (R-North Reading), an opponent of the legislation, said supporters never got an accurate tally of how many colleagues planned to vote in favor of the bill.

"The house of cards collapsed," Jones said in an interview immediately following the vote. Jones said many supporters who in the end voted against the bill did so due to the "political liability" of voting in favor of providing benefits to illegal immigrants.

Julie Teer, press secretary for Gov. Mitt Romney, said, "Governor Romney commends the members of the House who recognized as we all do that it is wrong to reward illegal immigrants. Instead, Governor Romney would like to focus on providing more resources to our legal immigrants."

But supporters, including House Speaker Salvatore DiMasi, said they were disappointed and called the vote one of conscience. Many also blamed the Romney administration for invoking "fear" with the issue among the public.

"I'm no longer surprised by the power of fear, and that's what won today … This administration has propagated the politics of fear in a remarkably relentless and ruthless way," said Ali Noorani, executive director of the Massachusetts Immigrants and Refugee Advocacy Coalition.

In response, Teer said, "This is not about fear or scare tactics. This is about the law, and it's a matter of following the law - and not providing incentives."

Through his spokeswoman, Kimberly Haberlin, DiMasi said he was not surprised by the vote since many representatives had been contacted recently by their constituents. Haberlin said the speaker felt like the students needed an answer and wanted to make good on his vow to vote on the issue this session.

"He was aware it was an uphill battle," she said. "But he also thought the substance of the bill was not understood by the public."

Earlier in the day, DiMasi and lead sponsor Rep. Marie St. Fleur (D-Dorchester) sent a letter to their colleagues outlining amendments that would "clarify and strengthen" the bill. In the letter, DiMasi and St. Fleur said, "The time has now come to cut through the rhetoric and weigh the bill solely on its merits."

They requested support for three amendments: requiring federal tax identification numbers, proof of a Massachusetts-issued equivalency degree as an alternative to a high school diploma within the state, and a more specific affidavit attesting to efforts to achieve citizenship.

One amendment, sponsored by Rep. Christine Canavan (D-Brockton), would have required non-citizen students, as a condition of eligibility, to provide proof of a taxpayer identification number and a signed affidavit that they have applied for citizenship. It was defeated 75-77.

Canavan was one of several lawmakers who voted against the bill on the final vote, but spoke in favor of the bill on the floor.

"If the federal government is going to let them in and let them stay," said Rep. Robert Correia (D-Fall River) who also voted against the final bill, "then shame on them, but let it not be shame on us."

Bill opponent Rep. Marie Parente (D-Milford) countered: "Ask not what this country can do for you, but what you can do for yourself. It's not walking across the border and dismantling Democracy."

The vote reflected declining support since Tuesday, when advocates were seeking a veto-proof majority of more than 100 votes.

Noorani said the bill's proponents would file the legislation again next session.

"This is not an issue and we are not a community that's going away," he said.

Outside the chamber after the vote, Rep. Byron Rushing told a crowd of students, "Just remember, we get a Democratic governor next year, and you only need 81 votes."

Several members of DiMasi's leadership team defected from the speaker's effort to pass the bill. Votes against included: Lida Harkins (D-Needham), the assistant majority leader; Thomas Petrolati (D-Ludlow), the speaker pro tempore; Robert DeLeo (D-Winthrop), chairman of the Ways and Means committee.

Earlier Wednesday, the House adopted a resolution offered by Harkins urging Congress to "enact legislation that will resolve the current state of flux surrounding policies for in-state tuition rates for in-state, undocumented immigrants who attend public institutions of higher education."

Return to top


The Boston Globe
Thursday, January 12, 2006

Immigrant tuition bill defeated
Mass. House votes no on rate cut for the undocumented
By Yvonne Abraham, Globe Staff

Massachusetts House members last night decisively defeated a controversial bill to extend in-state tuition rates at public colleges to undocumented immigrants, effectively killing the measure for this year.

The 96-to-57 tally surprised advocates of the bill, who believed they had enough votes to win approval in the House and at one point were predicting they may have enough support to override a certain veto from Governor Mitt Romney.

Opponents of the bill appeared well organized, and in recent days they had flooded some legislators with phone calls urging them to vote against the measure. Some lawmakers were told they would face opponents in this fall's elections if they supported the bill.

"I've gotten dozens upon dozens of calls and e-mails, and they were all of one view," said House minority leader Bradley H. Jones, a North Reading Republican, who opposed the legislation. "Members heard people's apprehension about giving benefits to undocumented people."

The defeat followed an unusually emotional day at the State House. As legislators offered impassioned speeches on the House floor, young students, some of whom said they were undocumented immigrants, gathered on the marble floor outside the chamber, watching the debate on a small television, growing more deflated as the evening wore on and it became clear they would lose.

During the six-hour debate, lawmakers grappled with the thorny questions confronting Massachusetts as it grows more diverse and its economy more reliant on the foreign-born.

"You know these children," said Marie St. Fleur, the Dorchester Democrat who sponsored the bill. "Many of their parents bag your groceries at the store. They mow your neighbor's lawn. They clean your neighbors' homes. They wait on you at local restaurants. They care for your infirmed.... All these children are asking for is the power to pay the same tuition rate as their peers."

Representative Marie Parente, a Milford Democrat, said immigrants who are here illegally should not be given advantages over residents who struggle as she did when she was a child.

Parente was a foster child and attended college later in life because she could not afford to go right out of high school.

"You're going to educate people to take our own technical jobs, the ones our students need?" Parente said.

Other lawmakers said the issue should be left to the federal government and that extending in-state tuition rates to undocumented immigrants amounted to rewarding them for breaking the nation's immigration laws.

Representative George N. Peterson Jr., a Grafton Republican who originally supported the bill based on personal appeals from undocumented students, opposed it yesterday, saying that even if students were permitted to attend college here at in-state rates, they could not legally obtain jobs here.

House Speaker Salvatore F. DiMasi, who pushed for a vote, said he was disappointed by the final tally.

He had sent a letter to lawmakers yesterday morning urging them to support the legislation, but said he refused to twist arms. His members were getting pressure in their districts, he said, and he did not want to strong-arm them to take a vote that might have hurt them politically.

"I don't want to force people to vote for something that will harm them in their districts," he said after the vote was taken. "I never did a head-count.

"I didn't want to delay the vote, because [students] wanted to know if it was yes or no so they could" make other plans, he said. "They deserved that."

Robert Casimiro, executive director of the Massachusetts Coalition for Immigration Reform, said lawmakers finally listened to the public outcry over the issue.

"There seemed to be a groundswell of support in [the State House]. I thought they would get a majority," Casimiro said. "But you listen to the talk shows and all these people are calling in, and they're vehemently opposed to it. It's like two different worlds."

Romney welcomed the vote.

Allowing undocumented immigrants to pay in-state rates would have extended a significant discount to them. At the University of Massachusetts at Amherst for example, the tuition is $9,300 annually for in-state students and $18,000 for those from outside the state.

The legislation would have applied only to those students who graduated from a Massachusetts high school after attending it for at least three years and signed an affidavit affirming that they intended to seek citizenship.

The debate over in-state tuition rates here has been taking place in the context of a heated national controversy over immigration.

In Washington, the Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors (DREAM) Act, sponsored by Senators Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts and John S. McCain of Arizona would require that states extend in-state tuition rates to undocumented students. Before the bill was voted on yesterday at the State House, lawmakers gave near-unanimous approval to the measure urging Congress to act on the matter.

The subject has divided candidates for governor here, with Lieutenant Governor Kerry Healey a leading opponent of the in-state tuition and Attorney General Thomas F. Reilly strongly supporting it.

Ali Noorani, executive director of the Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition, expressed disappointment yesterday. But he said the bill would be back next year.

"We thought we had the votes," said Noorani. "But in recent days it became clear that the politics of fear pushed legislators to the point where they couldn't support this."

Return to top


NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml


Return to CLT Updates page

Return to CLT home page